Plant Ecology and Evolution 153(3): 337-347, doi: 10.5091/plecevo.2020.1663
Ecological niche overlap among species of the genus Zaluzania (Asteraceae) from the dry regions of Mexico
expand article infoMario Ernesto Suárez-Mota, José Luis Villaseñor§
‡ División de Estudios de Postgrado, Universidad de la Sierra Juárez, Avenida Universidad S/N, Ixtlán de Juárez, Oaxaca, México C.P. 68725, Mexico§ Departamento de Botánica, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado postal 70-367, 04510 México, D.F., Mexico
Open Access
Abstract

Background and aims – The hypothesis of ecological niche conservatism postulates that closely related species share ecologically similar environments; that is, they tend to maintain the characteristics of their fundamental niche over time. The objective of this study is to evaluate the similarity and equivalence of the ecological niches among species of the genus Zaluzania (Asteraceae), characteristic of the Mexican arid and semi-arid regions, to infer their potential niche conservatism.

Methods – Based on critically reviewed herbarium occurrence data, potential distribution models for eight species of Zaluzania were generated using the Maxent algorithm. The overlap between potential distribution areas was then evaluated using equivalence and ecological niche parameters implemented in the ENMTools software; for this we quantified the degree of overlap and similarity between the niches using the equivalence (D) and similarity (I) parameters.

Key results – The resulting models show that species display areas of high suitability along the Mexican dry regions, as well as overlapping heterogeneous values. All models showed high AUC (Area Under the Curve) values (> 0.8). The D and I values between each pair of species showed low values of overlap.

Conclusions – Each species of the genus shows a fundamental niche distinct from their sister species. The genus thus offers an example of niche divergence among species, with each one adapting to different environmental pressures. Our results do not support the hypothesis of niche conservatism in the genus, suggesting that the species evolved in divergent environments.

Keywords
centroid, ecological niche, MaxEnt, niche conservatism, niche overlap, Zaluzania

References

  • Bellier E., Certain G., Planque B., Monestiez P., Bretagnolle V. (2010) Modelling habitat selection at multiple scales with multivariate geostatistics: an application to seabirds in open sea. Oikos 119(6): 988–999. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17808.x
  • Broennimann O., Fitzpatrick M.C., Pearman P.B., Petitpierre B., Pellissier L., Yoccoz N.G., Thuller W., Fortin M.J., Randin C., Zimmermann N.E., Graham C.H., Guisan A. (2012) Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21(4): 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00698.x
  • Brown J.H., Lomolino M.V. (1998) Biogeography. 2nd Ed. Sunderland, Sinauer Associate.
  • Cervantes-Zamora Y., Cornejo-Olguín S.L., Lucero-Márquez R., Espinosa-Rodríguez J.M., Miranda-Víquez E., Pineda-Velásquez A. (1990) Clasificación de Regiones Naturales de México, IV. Atlas Nacional de México. Vol. II. Escala 1:4000000.
  • Chase J.M., Leibold M.A. (2003) Ecological niches: interspecific interactions. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
  • Cruz-Cárdenas G., López-Mata L., Ortiz-Solorio C.A., Villaseñor J.L., Ortiz E., Silva J.T., Estrada-Godoy F. (2014) Interpolation of Mexican soil properties at a scale of 1:1000000. Geoderma 213: 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.07.014
  • Elith J., Graham C.H., Anderson R.P., Dudík M., Ferrier S., Guisan A., Hijmans R.J., Huettmann F., Leathwick J.R., Lehmann A., Li J., Lohmann L.G., Loiselle B.A., Manion G., Moritz C., Nakamura M., Nakazawa Y., Overton J.M.M., Peterson A.T., Phillips S.J., Richardson K., Scachetti-Pereira R., Schapire R.E., Soberón J., Williams S., Wisz M.S., Zimmermann N.E. (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29(2): 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
  • Giovanelli J., Haddad C., Alexandrino J. (2008) Predicting the potential distribution of the alien invasive American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) in Brazil. Biological Invasions 10(5): 585–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9154-5
  • Graham C.H., Ron S.R., Santos J.C., Schneider C.J., Moritz C. (2004) Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mechanisms in Dendrobatid frogs. Evolution 58(8): 1781–1793. https://doi.org/10.1554/03-274
  • Grinnell J. (1917) The niche-relationships of the California thrasher. The Auk 34(4): 427–433.
  • Kambhampati S., Peterson A.T. (2007) Ecological niche conservation and differentiation in the wood-feeding cockroaches, Cryptocercus, in the United States. Biological Journal of Linnaean Society 90(3): 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00734.x
  • Leibold M.A., Geddes P. (2005) El concepto de nicho en las metacomunidades. Ecología Austral 15: 117–129.
  • Maciel-Mata C.A., Manríquez-Morán N., Aguilar P.O., Sánchez-Rojas G. (2015) El área de distribución de las especies: revisión del concepto. Acta Universitaria 25(2): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2015.690
  • Maguire B. Jr. (1973) Niche response structure and the analytical potentials of its relationship to the habitat. The American Naturalist 107(954): 213–246. https://doi.org/10.1086/282827
  • Manzanilla-Quiñones U., Delgado-Valerio P., Hernández-Ramos J., Molina-Sánchez A., García Magaña J.J., Rocha Granados M. del C. (2019) Similaridad del nicho ecológico de Pinus montezumae y P. pseudostrobus (Pinaceae) en México: implicaciones para la selección de áreas productoras de semillas y de conservación. Acta Botanica Mexicana 126: e1398. https://doi.org/10.21829/abm126.2019.1398
  • Martínez-Meyer E., Díaz-Porras D., Peterson A.T., Yáñez-Arenas C. (2013) Ecological niche structure and rangewide abundance patterns of species. Biology Letters 9(1): 20120637. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0637
  • Oksanen J., Kindt R., Legendre P., O’Hara B., Simpson G. L., Solymos P., Henry M., Stevens H., Wagner H. (2008) Vegan: community ecology package, R package version 1.15–1. Available at http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org/ [accessed 4 Aug. 2020].
  • Olsen J.S. (1979) Systematics of Zaluzania (Asteraceae: Heliantheae). Rhodora 81(82): 449–501.
  • Pliscoff P., Fuentes-Castillo T. (2011) Modelación de la distribución de especies and ecosistemas en el tiempo y en el espacio: una revisión de las nuevas herramientas and enfoques disponibles. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande 48: 61–79. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022011000100005
  • Pyron R.A., Burbrink F.T. (2009) Can the tropical conservatism hypothesis explain temperate species richness patterns? An inverse latitudinal biodiversity gradient in the New World snake tribe Lampropeltini. Global Ecology Biogeography 18(4): 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00462.x
  • Pyron R.A., Costa G.C., Patten M.A., Burbrink F.T. (2015) Phylogenetic niche conservatism and the evolutionary basis of ecological speciation. Biological Reviews 90(4): 1248–1262. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12154
  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www.r-project.org [accessed 4 Aug. 2020].
  • Sánchez-Fernández D., Lobo J.M., Abellán P., Millán A. (2011) Environmental niche divergence between genetically distant lineages of an endangered water beetle. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 103(4): 891–903. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01668.x
  • Soberón J., Nakamura M. (2009) Niches and distributional areas: concepts, methods, and assumptions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(2): 19644–19650. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901637106
  • Soberón J., Peterson A.T. (2004) Biodiversity informatics: managing and applying primary biodiversity data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 359(1444): 689–698. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1439
  • Soberón J., Peterson A.T. (2005) Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodiversity Informatics 2: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17161/bi.v2i0.4
  • Suárez-Mota M.E., Villaseñor R.J.L., López-Mata L. (2015) Ecological niche similarity between congeneric Mexican plant species. Plant Ecology and Evolution 148(3): 318–328. https://doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.2015.1147
  • Tôrres N.M., De Marco P.Jr., Santos T., Silveira L., T. de Almeida J.A., Diniz-Filho J.A.F. (2012) Can species distribution modeling provide estimates of population densities? A case study with jaguars in the Neotropics. Diversity and Distributions 18(6): 615–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00892.x
  • Turner B.L. (2012) Recension of the Mexican species of Zaluzania (Asteraceae: Heliantheae). Phytologia 94(3): 319–333.
  • VanDerWal J., Shoo L.P., Johnson C.N., Williams S.E. (2009) Abundance and the environmental niche: environmental suitability estimated from niche models predicts the upper limit of local abundance. The American Naturalist 174(2): 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1086/600087
  • Warren D.L., Beaumont L.J., Dinnage R., Baumgartner B. (2019) New methods for measuring ENM breadth and overlap in environmental space. Ecography 42(3): 444–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03900
  • Wiens J.J., Ackerly D.D., Allen A.P., Anacker B.L., Buckley L.B., Cornell H.V., Damschen E.I., Davies T.J., Grytnes J.A., Harrison S.P., Hawkins B.A., Holt R.D., McCain C.M., Stephens P.R. (2010) Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecology Letters 13(10): 1310–1324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01515.x
  • Yañez‐Arenas C., Martínez‐Meyer E., Mandujano S., Rojas‐Soto O. (2012) Modelling geographic patterns of population density of the white‐tailed deer in central Mexico by implementing ecological niche theory. Oikos 121(12): 2081–2089. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20350.x