Plant Ecology and Evolution 154(2): 201-206, doi: 10.5091/plecevo.2021.1642
Effect of pollinator size on seed set in Lamium album var. barbatum
expand article infoMitsuru Hattori, Yoko Tamada§, Takao Itino|
‡ Graduate School of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki city, Nagasaki, Japan§ Graduate School of Science and Technology, Department of Science, Shinshu University, Matsumoto city, Nagano, Japan| Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Shinshu University, Matsumoto city, Nagano, Japan
Open Access
Abstract

Background and aims – Previous researchers have demonstrated that geographic variation in pollinator community composition can generate diversity in the floral traits of animal-pollinated plants. Our study focused on the bumblebee-pollinated white dead-nettle Lamium album var. barbatum. Geographic variation in corolla length of this species is known to be correlated with regional pollinator size. The aim of this study is to clarify whether size-matching between flower and pollinator affects seed set in L. album.

Material and methods – In the present study, we investigated two L. album populations on Mount Norikura, central Japan. We determined the pollinator community composition and corolla length during the flowering period of L. album and recorded seed set after a single visit by different pollinator categories.

Key results – We observed that the main pollinators of L. album were bumblebee queens and workers. Bumblebee queens visited flowers more frequently than workers during peak flowering. Furthermore, size-matching between flowers and bumblebee queens, but not workers, strongly promoted seed set. These results suggest that L. album flower size is adapted to bumblebee queens, the main pollinator during peak flowering season in our study sites.

Keywords
Lamiaceae, pollination mutualism, pollinator mediated selection, size-matching

References

  • Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B.M. & Walker S.C. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  • Burd M., Ashman T.L., Campbell D.R., et al. 2009. Ovule number per flower in a world of unpredictable pollination. American Journal of Botany 96: 1159–1167. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800183
  • Hattori M., Nagano Y. & Itino T. 2015. Geographic variation in flower size and flower-visitor composition of two bumblebee-pollinated, spring-flowering herbs, Lamium album L. var. barbatum (Lamiaceae) and Meehania urticifolia (Lamiaceae). American Journal of Plant Sciences 6: 737–745. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.65079
  • Hattori M., Nagano Y., Shinohara Y. & Itino T. 2016. Pattern of flower size variation along an altitudinal gradient differs between Impatiens textori and Impatiens noli-tangere. Journal of Plant Interactions 11: 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2016.1226437
  • Hayashi Y. 2009. Nihon-no Yasou. Yama to Keikoku Sha, Tokyo.
  • Johnson S.D. 2006. Pollinator-driven speciation in plants. In: Harder L.D. & Barrett S.C.H. (eds) Ecology and evolution of flowers: 295–310. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Karron J.D. & Mitchell R.J. 2012. Effects of floral display size on male and female reproductive success in Mimulus ringens. Annals of Botany 109: 563–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr193
  • Kudo G., Hirao A.S. & Kawai Y. 2011. Pollination efficacy of bumblebee queens and workers in the alpine shrub Rhododendron aureum. International Journal of Plant Sciences 172: 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1086/657282
  • Kuriya S., Hattori. M., Nagano. Y. & Itino N. 2015. Altitudinal flower size variation correlates with local pollinator size in a bumblebee-pollinated herb, Prunella vulgaris L. (Lamiaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 28: 1761–1769. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12693
  • Nagano Y., Abe K., Kitazawa T., Hattori M., Hirao S.A. & Itino T. 2014. Changes in pollinator fauna affect altitudinal variation in floral size in a bumblebee-pollinated herb. Ecology and Evolution 4: 3395–3407. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1191
  • Newman E., Manning J. & Anderson B. 2015. Local adaptation: mechanical fit between floral ecotypes of Nerine humilis (Amaryllidaceae) and pollinator communities. Evolution 69: 2262–2275. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12736
  • R Development Core Team 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from https://www.r-project.org/ [accessed 8 Apr. 2021].
  • Strauss S.Y. & Whittall J.B. 2006. Non-pollinator agents of selection on floral traits. In: Harder L.D. & Barrett S.C.H. (eds) Ecology and evolution of flowers: 120–138. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Sun M., Gross K. & Schiestl F.P. 2014. Floral adaptation to local pollinator guilds in a terrestrial orchid. Annals of Botany 113: 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct219
  • Van der Niet T., Peakall R. & Johnson S.D. 2014. Pollinator-driven ecological speciation in plants: new evidence and future perspectives. Annals of Botany 113: 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct290