Plant Ecology and Evolution 152(2): 392-401, doi: 10.5091/plecevo.2019.1601
Typification of the puzzling diatom species Neidium iridis (Neidiaceae)
expand article infoPaul B Hamilton, Katarzyna Stachura-Suchoples§, Wolf-Henning Kusber§, Andreanne Bouchard, Regine Jahn|
‡ Research & Collections, Canadian Museum of Nature P.O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa K1P 6P4, Canada§ Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 6-8, 14195 Berlin, Germany| Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin‒Dahlem, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Open Access
Abstract

Background and aims – Confusion over the taxonomic identity of Neidium iridis (Ehrenb.) Cleve (= Navicula iridis Ehrenb.) has persisted for more than 130 years with identifications of valve shapes varying from elliptical to linear and sizes from 100 to 300 µm. This confusion can be linked to the rarity of the species and poor attention to the original line drawings of Ehrenberg. This study examines the type material of Navicula iridis and further uses additional material from North America to define the species Neidium iridis.

Methods – Mica and material from Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg’s Collection were studied to examine Navicula iridis. Light and electron microscope techniques were used to document the variability of valve morphology of original material in comparison with other fossil and recent materials.

Key results – Ehrenberg designated no nomenclatural type for Navicula iridis at the place of its first description, and until recently the original material was not studied. One freshwater extant locality was identified (New York, West Point) in the original 1843 publication, and in his notes and drawings. Examination of the micas and material from the type locality, showed that Navicula iridis was very rare. Two specimens were found that matched the line drawing presented by Ehrenberg. In addition, we examined Ehrenberg’s original material with SEM, as well as two other localities in North America and present LM and SEM documentation of additional valve forms. A further evaluation of the status of Neidium columnaris, Neidium maximum and an unknown taxon in relation to Neidium iridis is presented.

Conclusions – The findings of this study elucidate the taxon Navicula iridis (= Neidium iridis) as described by Ehrenberg in 1843. This will assist in the identification of other large Neidium taxa which to date have been associated with Neidium iridis.

Keywords
Neidium iridis, Ehrenberg, taxonomy, lectotype, type material

References

  • Boyer C.S. (1916) The Diatomaceae of Philadelphia and vicinity. Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott.
  • Cleve P.T. (1894) Synopsis of the naviculoid diatoms. Part I. Kongliga Svenska-Vetenskaps Akademiens Handlingar 26(2): 1–194.
  • Cleve-Euler A. (1955) Die Diatomeen von Schweden und Finnland. Teil IV, Biraphidae 2. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, Fjärde Serien 5(4): 1–232.
  • Ehrenberg C.G. (1843) Verbreitung und Einfluss des mikroskopischen Lebens in Süd- und Nord-Amerika. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1841: 291–446.
  • Germain H. (1981) Flore de diatomées eaux saumâtres du Massif Armoricain et des contrées voisines d’Europe occidentale. Paris, Société Nouvelle des Éditions Boubée.
  • Grunow A. (1860) Über neue oder ungenügend gekannte Algen. Erste Folge, Diatomeen, Familie Naviculaceen. Verhandlungen der kaiserlich-königlichen zoologisch-botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 10: 503–582.
  • Hanna G.D. (1933) Diatoms of the Florida peat deposits. Florida State Geological Survey 23 and 24th Annual Report: 68–119. Tallahassee, Florida.
  • Hustedt F. (1930) Bacillariophyta. In: Pascher A. (ed.) Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Jena, Gustav Fischer Verlag.
  • Jahn R., Kusber W.-H. (2004) Algae of the Ehrenberg collection 1. Typification of 32 names of diatom taxa described by C.G. Ehrenberg. Willdenowia 34: 577–595. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.34.34219
  • Krammer K., Lange-Bertalot H. (1986) Bacillariophyceae. 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. In: Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H., Mollenhauer D. (eds) Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, vol. 2/1. Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer Verlag.
  • Lefebvre K.E., Hamilton P.B. (2015) Morphology and molecular studies on large Neidium species (Bacillariophyta) of North America, including an examination of Ehrenberg’s types. Phytotaxa 220: 201–223. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.220.3.1
  • Lefebvre K., Hamilton P.B., Pick F.R. (2017) A comparison of molecular markers and morphology from Neidium taxa (Bacillariophyta) from eastern North America. Journal of Phycology 53: 680–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12537
  • Meister F. (1912) Die Kieselalgen der Schweiz. Beiträge zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz vol. 4(1). Bern, [publisher J. Wyss].
  • Metzeltin D., Lange-Bertalot H. (2007) Tropical diatoms of South America II. Special remarks on biogeographic disjunction. Iconographia Diatomologica 18: 1–877.
  • Okuno H. (1964) Diatomeenschalen im elektronenmikroskopischen Bild. Teil V. Fossil diatoms. Weinheim, J. Cramer.
  • Pantoscek J. (1902) Die Bacillarien des Balatonsees (section 1). In: Die Biologie des Balatonsees, Resultate der wissenschaftlichen Erforschung Balatonsees (Zweiter Band), eds. Balatonsee-Commission der UNG. Wien, Geographischen Gesellschaft.
  • Patrick R., Reimer C.W. (1966) The diatoms of the United States. vol. l: Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae, Achnanthaceae, Naviculaceae. Philadelphia, Monographs of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.
  • Pelletan J. (1888) Les diatomées. Histoire naturelle, préparation, classification & description des principales espèces. Paris, Journal de Micrographie. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.929
  • Pfitzer E. (1871) Untersuchungen über Bau und Entwickelung der Bacillariaceen (Diatomaceen). In: Hanstein J. (ed.) Botanische Abhandlungen aus dem Gebiet der Morphologie und Physiologie. Bonn, Adolph Marcus.
  • Reimer C.W. (1959) The diatom genus Neidium. I. New species, new records and taxonomic revisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 111: 1–35.
  • Ross R., Cox E.J., Karayeva N.I., Mann D.G., Paddock T.B.B., Simonsen R., Sims P.A. (1979) An amended terminology for the siliceous components of the diatom cell. Nova Hedwigia Beiheft 64: 513–533.
  • Sabelina M.M., Kiselev I.A., Proshkina-Lavrenko A.I., Sheshukova V.S. (1951) Diatomovye vodorosli (redakmor eynuska A.I. Proschkina-Lavrenko). Opredelitely presnovodnykh vodoroslei S.S.S.R. VYPUSK 4. Moskva, Gosudarstvennoe Izdatelystvo Sovetskaya Nauka.
  • Siver P.A., Hamilton P.B., Stachura-Suchoples K., Kociolek J.P. (2003) Morphological observations of Neidium species with sagittate apices, including the description of N. cape-codii sp. nov. Diatom Research 18: 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2003.9705578
  • Siver P.A., Hamilton P.B., Stachura-Suchoples K., Kociolek J.P. (2005) Diatoms of North America: The freshwater flora of Cape Cod, Massachusetts, U.S.A. Iconographia Diatomologica 14: 1–463.
  • Stosch H.A. von (1975) An amended terminology of the diatom girdle. Nova Hedwigia 53: 1–35.
  • VanLandingham S.L. (1978) Catalogue of the fossil and recent genera and species of diatoms and their synonyms. Part VI. Neidium through Rhoicosigma 6: 2964–3605. Vaduz, J. Cramer.
  • Van Heurck H. (1880–1885) Synopsis des diatomées de Belgique. Atlas, taf. 1–30 (1880), taf. 31–77 (1881), taf. 78–103 (1882), taf. 104–132 (1883), taf. A, B, C (1885), table alphabétique, texte (1885). Anvers, édité par l’auteur.