Plant Ecology and Evolution 151(2): 209-218, doi: 10.5091/plecevo.2018.1354
An experimentally introduced population of Brassica rapa (Brassicaceae). 1. Phenotypic selection over three years following colonization of a novel environment
expand article infoMichael R. Sekor, Steven J. Franks
‡ Louis Calder Biological Field Station, Department of Biological Sciences, Fordham University, Armonk, NY, 10504, United States of America
Open Access

Background and aims – Despite the importance of selection in driving evolution, little is known about the consistency of selection, particularly in the early stages of colonization of novel environments. This study examines the targets and consistency of selection on an experimentally introduced population of the annual plant, Brassica rapa L., in its first three years following introduction to a novel environment.

Methods – Phenotypic selection analyses were conducted on a variety of traits collected during the first three years following introduction from California to New York, and the consistency of the strength and direction of selection was examined.

Key results – The introduced population experienced direct selection for increased overall size and earlier flowering in 2011 and 2012, and increased height, earlier flowering, and longer duration of flowering in 2013. While the direction of selection only varied for height, inter-annual variation in the strength of selection was observed for a variety of traits, possibly due to changing weather patterns in the introduced environment.

Conclusions – The results suggest that selection is dynamic and can fluctuate over time. Thus multi-year assessments of selection are useful for predicting evolutionary responses, particularly in the early stages of colonization of a novel environment.

natural selection, plants, phenotypic selection, morphology, flowering time, Brassica rapa, ecological genetics, introduced species, Aster model


  • Agren J., Schemske D. (1994) Evolution of trichome number in a naturalized population of Brassica rapa. The American Naturalist 143: 1–13.
  • Anderson J.H., Faulds P.L., Atlas W.I., Quinn T.P. (2013) Reproductive success of captively bred and naturally spawned Chinook salmon colonizing newly accessible habitat. Evolutionary Applications 6: 165–179.
  • Anderson J.T., Inouye D.W., Mckinney A.M., Colautti R.I., Mitchell-Olds T. (2012) Phenotypic plasticity and adaptive evolution contribute to advancing flowering phenology in response to climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 279: 3843–3852.
  • Bell G. (2010) Fluctuating selection: the perpetual renewal of adaptation in variable environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B Biological Sciences 365: 87–97.
  • Bossdorf O., Auge H., Lafuma L., Rogers W.E., Siemann E., Prati D. (2005) Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144: 1–11.
  • Byers D.L. (2005) Evolution in heterogeneous environments and the potential of maintenance of genetic variation in traits of adaptive significance. Genetica 123: 107–124.
  • Carroll S.P., Klassen S.P., Dingle H. (1998) Rapidly evolving adaptations to host ecology and nutrition in the soapberry bug. Evolutionary Ecology 12: 955–968.
  • Caruso C.M., Peterson S.B., Ridley C.E. (2003) Natural selection on floral traits of Lobelia (Lobeliaceae): spatial and temporal variation. American Journal of Botany 90: 1333–1340.
  • Colautti R.I., Barrett S.C.H. (2011) Population divergence along lines of genetic variance and covariance in the invasive plant Lythrum salicaria in eastern North America. Evolution 65: 2514–2529.
  • Colautti R.I., Lau J.A. (2015) Contemporary evolution during invasion: evidence for differentiation, natural selection, and local adaptation. Molecular Ecology 24: 1999–2017.
  • Dechaine J.M., Johnston J.A., Brock M.T., Weinig C. (2007) Constraints on the evolution of adaptive plasticity: costs of plasticity to density are expressed in segregating progenies. New Phytologist 176: 874–882.
  • Dixon P.M. (1993) The bootstrap and the jackknife: describing the precision of ecological indices. In: Gurevitch J.,Scheiner S. (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments: 290–318. New York, Chapman & Hall.
  • Fox J. (2002) Bootstrapping regression models. Appendix to an R and S-Plus companion to applied regression. Available from [accessed 24 Apr. 2018].
  • Franks S.J., Sim S., Weis A.E. (2007) Rapid evolution of flowering time by an annual plant in response to a climate fluctuation. Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences of the United Stats of America 104: 1278–1282.
  • Franks S.J., Weis A.E. (2008) A change in climate causes rapid evolution of multiple life-history traits and their interactions in an annual plant. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 1321–1334.
  • Franks S.J., Avise J.C., Bradshaw W.E., Conner J.K., Etterson J.R., Mazer S.J., Shaw R.G., Weis A.E. (2008a) The resurrection initiative: storing ancestral genotypes to capture evolution in action. Bioscience 58 :870–873.
  • Franks S.J., Pratt P.D., Dray F.A., Simms E.L. (2008b) Selection on herbivory resistance and growth rate in an invasive plant. The American Naturalist 171: 678–691.
  • Franks S.J., Weber J.J., Aitken S.N. (2014) Evolutionary and plastic responses to climate change in terrestrial plant populations. Evolutionary Applications 7: 123–139.
  • Gotanda K.M., Hendry A.P. (2014) Using adaptive traits to consider potential consequences of temporal variation in selection: male guppy colour through time and space. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 112: 108–122.
  • Grant P.R., Grant B.R. (2014) 40 years of evolution: Darwin’s finches on Daphne Major Island. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  • Griffith C., Kim E., Donohue K. (2004) Life-history variation and adaptation in the historically mobile plant Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) in North America. American Journal of Botany 91: 837–849.
  • Gutowsky L.F.G., Fox M.G. (2012) Intra-population variability of life-history traits and growth during range expansion of the invasive round goby, Neogobius melanostomus. Fisheries Management and Ecolology 19: 78–88.
  • Harris C.J., Dormontt E.E., Le Roux J.J., Lowe A., Leishman M.R. (2012) No consistent association between changes in genetic diversity and adaptive responses of Australian acacias in novel ranges. Evolutionary Ecology 26: 1345–1360.
  • Hendry A.P., Letcher B.H., Gries G. (2003) Estimating natural selection acting on stream-dwelling Atlantic salmon: implications for the restoration of extirpated populations. Conservation Biology 17: 795–805.
  • Heschel M.S., Riginos C. (2005) Mechanisms of selection for drought stress tolerance and avoidance in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). American Journal of Botany 92: 37–44.
  • Hollingsworth M.L., Bailey J.P. (2000) Evidence for massive clonal growth in the invasive weed Fallopia japonica (Japanese Knotweed). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 463–472.
  • Kerwin R., Feusier J., Corwin J., Rubin M., Lin C., Muok A., Larson B., Li B., Joseph B., Francisco M., Copeland D., Weinig C., Kliebenstein D.J. (2015) Natural genetic variation in Arabidopsis thaliana defense metabolism genes modulates field fitness. Elife 4: e05604.
  • Kingsolver J.G., Hoekstra H.E., Hoekstra J.M., Berrigan D., Vignieri S.N., Hill C.E., Hoang A., Gibert P., Beerli P. (2001) The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. The American Naturalist 157: 245–261.
  • Kulpa S.M., Leger E.A. (2013) Strong natural selection during plant restoration favors an unexpected suite of plant traits. Evolutionary Applications 6: 510–523.
  • Lande R. (1979) Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33: 402–416.
  • Maron J., Vilà M., Bommarco R., Elmendorf S., Beardsley P. (2004) Rapid evolution of an invasive plant. Ecological Monographs 74: 261–280.
  • Millet A., Pelletier F., Bélisle M., Garant D. (2015) Patterns of fluctuating selection on morphological and reproductive traits in female Tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor). Evolutionary Biology 42: 349–358.
  • Moran E.V., Alexander J.M. (2014) Evolutionary responses to global change: lessons from invasive species. Ecology Letters 17: 637–649.
  • Munguía-Rosas M.A., Ollerton J., Parra-Tabla V., De-Nova J.A. (2011) Meta-analysis of phenotypic selection on flowering phenology suggests that early flowering plants are favoured. Ecology Letters 14: 511–521.
  • Murren C.J., Denning W., Pigliucci M. (2005) Relationships between vegetative and life history traits and fitness in a novel field environment: impacts of herbivores. Evolutionary Ecology 19: 583–601.
  • Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner M.H. (1989) Applied linear statistical models. 3rd Ed. Boston, CRC Press.
  • Price T.D., Yeh P.J., Harr B. (2008) Phenotypic plasticity and the evolution of a socially selected trait following colonization of a novel environment. The American Naturalist 172(S1): S49–S62.
  • R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Reznick D.N., Ghalambor C.K. (2001) The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 112: 183–198.
  • Sandring S., Riihimäki M.-A., Savolainen O., Ågren J. (2007) Selection on flowering time and floral display in an alpine and a lowland population of Arabidopsis lyrata. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 558–567.
  • Schueller S.K. (2007) Island–mainland difference in Nicotiana glauca (Solanaceae) corolla length: a product of pollinator-mediated selection? Evolutionary Ecology 21: 81–98.
  • Sekor M.R., Franks S.J. (in press) An experimentally introduced population of Brassica rapa (Brassicaceae). 2. Rapid evolution of phenotypic traits. Plant Ecology and Evolution.
  • Stinchcombe J.R., Rutter M.T., Burdick D.S., Tiffin P., Rausher M.D., Mauricio R. (2002) Testing for environmentally induced bias in phenotypic estimates of natural selection: theory and practice. The American Naturalist 160: 511–523.
  • Thébaud C., Simberloff D. (2001) Are plants really larger in their introduced ranges? The American Naturalist 157: 231–236.
  • Western D. (2001) Human-modified ecosystems and future evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 5458–5465.
  • Westley P.A.H. (2011) What invasive species reveal about the rate and form of contemporary phenotypic change in nature. The American Naturalist 177: 496–509.
  • Yeh P.J., Price T.D. (2004) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the successful colonization of a novel environment. The American Naturalist 164: 531–542.