Research Article
Print
Research Article
Towards a taxonomic revision of Tradescantia subg. Campelia (Commelinaceae) I: sectional arrangement and revision of T. sect. Rhoeo
expand article infoMarco O.O. Pellegrini§, David R. Hunt, Jason R. Grant|, Avery Rowe, Higor Antonio-Domingues#§, Rafael F. de Almeida§
‡ Royal Botanic Gardens, Richmond, United Kingdom
§ University of the Witwatersrand, School of Animal, Plant & Environmental Sciences, C.E. Moss Herbarium, Johannesburg, South Africa
| Université de Neuchâtel, Institut de Biologie, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
¶ Unaffiliated, Machynlleth, United Kingdom
# Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais, São Paulo, Brazil
† Deceased author
Open Access

Abstract

Background and aimsTradescantia subg. Campelia is the most morphologically diverse and one of the most taxonomically complex subgenera of Tradescantia. This makes taxonomic efforts within this group challenging, especially due to the current lack of formal recognition of monophyletic infrageneric groups and their widespread horticultural use. Thus, continuing our previous efforts, we provide a sectional classification for the subgenus, combined with a taxonomic revision of T. sect. Rhoeo.

Material and methods – This study was based on a combination of systematic, micro- and macromorphological, palynological, and horticultural data. We analysed type specimens, protologues, field images, and herbarium sheets of all names, in addition to growing all species and cultivars. We have also reviewed previously published palynological data for the recognised species and provided all needed corrections and updates, in addition to a novel interpretation of their taxonomic relevance.

Key results – We propose the subdivision of T. subg. Campelia into four sections: 1) T. sect. Campelia; 2) T. sect. Corinna; 3) T. sect. Cymbispatha; and 4) T. sect. Rhoeo. These sections are supported by a combination of molecular, micro- and macromorphological, anatomical, palynological, cytological, and phytochemical data. Within T. sect. Rhoeo, we accept two species, T. spathacea and the newly recognised T. concolor. Horticulturally, we propose the T. spathacea Bantam Group, including five dwarf cultivars, while T. spathacea ‘Vittata’ is the only regular-sized variegated cultivar of wild origin. We also explore the palynology of T. sect. Rhoeo, highlighting palynotaxonomically relevant characters in Tradescantia and T. subg. Campelia.

Conclusions – We lay the groundwork for ongoing and future studies on T. subg. Campelia. The recognition of sections within this subgenus will facilitate identification, communication, and enable the recognition of functional taxonomic groups for future systematic and taxonomic studies. The combination of palynology and horticulture provides further support for the taxonomy and systematics of Tradescantia, and should be consistently included in future studies of the group.

Keywords

Commelinales, horticulture, pollen morphology, Tradescantiinae, spiderworts

Introduction

Tradescantia Ruppius ex L. emend. M.Pell. is the second largest genus of Commelinaceae, with ca 90 species (Pellegrini 2017; POWO 2025; WFO Plant List 2025). It is positioned in subtribe Tradescantiinae, closely related to Callisia Loefl., Elasis D.R.Hunt, Gibasis Raf., and Tripogandra Raf. (Evans et al. 2003; Wade et al. 2006; Burns et al. 2011; Hertweck and Pires 2014; Pellegrini 2017). Genera in Tradescantiinae can be primarily differentiated based on inflorescence, floral, and seed morphology, plus some additional anatomical characters (Faden and Hunt 1991; Faden 1998; Pellegrini 2017). Tradescantia is characterised by its main florescences composed of a double-cincinni fused back-to-back, with each cincinnus being contracted and subtended by a frondose bract, actinomorphic flowers with six equal or subequal stamens, and seeds with a linear hilum (Faden 1998; Panigo et al. 2011; Pellegrini 2017).

Based on molecular data, Hertweck and Pires (2014) highlighted that most sections proposed by Hunt (1975, 1980, 1983, 1986a) were non-monophyletic, a finding further supported by morphological data (Pellegrini 2017). Based on the cumulative data, Pellegrini (2017) proposed that Tradescantia be divided into five monophyletic subgenera: 1) T. subg. Austrotradescantia (D.R.Hunt) M.Pell.; 2) T. subg. Campelia (Rich.) M.Pell.; 3) T. subg. Mandonia (D.R.Hunt) M.Pell.; 4) T. subg. Setcreasea (K.Schum. & Sydow) M.Pell.; and 5) T. subg. Tradescantia. These subgenera are supported by a combination of micro- and macromorphological characters, ecology, biogeography, anatomy, phytochemistry, and cytology (Hertweck and Pires 2014; Pellegrini 2017). Out of the five recognised subgenera, only T. subg. Austrotradescantia has been taxonomically revised (i.e. Pellegrini 2018), while T. subg. Setcreasea has received a partial synopsis (Hunt 1975, 1976), and T. subg. Tradescantia received a partial taxonomic revision, focusing on the species native to the USA (Anderson and Woodson Jr 1935).

Tradescantia subg. Campelia is the most ecologically and morphologically diverse of the recognised subgenera (Pellegrini 2017). Species in this subgenus range from chamaephytes to geophytes, growing as terrestrial, rupicolous or epiphytes, inhabiting from completely exposed and open environments to forest understories, and showing either monopodial or sympodial growth, wide variability in phyllotaxy and ptyxis type, and the widest variation in synflorescence architecture in the genus (Pellegrini 2017). Their flowers can range from flat to tubular, sepals free to partially connate to completely connate, petals sessile or clawed and free to connate, stamens free from the petals or epipetalous, with filaments ranging from glabrous to variously barbate, anther connectives are so variable between species that it is almost species-specific, and the stigma ranges from truncate to capitulate to capitate to trilobate (Pellegrini 2017). Paradoxically, T. subg. Campelia is also the most morphologically cohesive group in the genus, being supported by four exclusive morphological synapomorphies, plus six homoplastic ones (Pellegrini 2017; see below). On the other hand, the other four subgenera of Tradescantia are supported by one or two exclusive synapomorphies and a few homoplastic ones (Pellegrini 2017). It is also the subgenus that includes the most horticulturally relevant and widely cultivated species in the genus, i.e. T. spathacea Sw., T. zanonia (L.) Sw., and T. zebrina Heynh. ex Bosse (Rowe 2025).

Due to the abovementioned morphological and ecological diversity, the taxa currently included in T. subg. Campelia have been inconsistently considered or hypothesised to be closely related by previous studies. These taxa were informally grouped for the first time by Hunt (1983, 1986a) in his sectional key for Tradescantia. This was later supported by Hertweck and Pires (2014) and Pellegrini (2017), who recovered T. subg. Campelia arranged into four well-supported and morphologically cohesive clades: 1) the flat-flowered T. sect. Rhoeo (Hance) D.R.Hunt; 2) a tubular-flowered clade [consisting of a combination of T. sect. Campelia (Rich.) D.R.Hunt and T. sect. Zebrina (Schnizl.) D.R.Hunt]; 3) the tubular-flowered T. sect. Corinna D.R.Hunt; and 4) the flat-flowered T. sect. Cymbispatha (Pichon) D.R.Hunt.

Regarding pollen morphology, Poole and Hunt (1980) considered the Tradescantia pollen type (i.e. their pollen Type 3) to be “ancestral” in subtribe Tradescantiinae. These authors provided a palynological overview of the family, with their descriptions and characterisations being exceedingly superficial and terminologically inaccurate. Unsurprisingly, when scoring those same palynological characters, Pellegrini (2017) obtained similar results, concluding that palynological characters were not systematically or taxonomically relevant within Tradescantia. However, these results have never been explored using a palynotaxonomic and ultrasculptural approach. Thus, the true taxonomic and systematic relevance of palynological characters in Commelinaceae remains to be tested.

The taxonomic, morphological, and ecological complexity of T. subg. Campelia, combined with the well-resolved internal resolution of the group, supported by both molecular (Hertweck and Pires 2014) and morphological data (Pellegrini 2017), suggests it would be helpful to recognise further infrageneric taxa. A sectional classification would formally recognise and highlight these clades’ diversity, as well as their systematic and horticultural importance within Tradescantia.

Thus, as part of our ongoing efforts and studies on Tradescantia (Hunt 1975, 1976, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1983, 1986a, 1986b, 2007; Poole and Hunt 1980; Grant 2000, 2004; Pellegrini 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018; Pellegrini et al. 2015, 2016, 2017; Rowe 2025), we initiate the efforts for a complete taxonomic revision of T. subg. Campelia, by proposing a sectional classification and presenting a taxonomic revision for the first of the four recognised sections. Our decisions are based on a combination of field and cultivation observations, and phylogenetic, macro- and micromorphological, palynological, cytological, distribution, ecological, reproductive, and horticultural data. Finally, we reinterpret and update the available palynological data for Tradescantia sect. Rhoeo, and provide a novel perspective on the untapped taxonomic and systematic potential of pollen data in Commelinaceae.

Material and methods

Taxonomy and nomenclature

The description and phenology were based on herbarium, spirit and fresh material, field data, and literature. Specimens from the following herbaria were also analysed: AAU, ALCB, ASU, BBS, BHCB, BM, BOTU, BR, BRIT, BRLU, CAS, CASAT, CAY, CEPEC, CESJ, CGMS, CICY, CIIDIR, CLF, CM, COL, CR, CTES, CVRD, E, ESA, F, FB, FCAB, FCQ, FLOR, FMB, FURB, GENT, GH, HA, HAMAB, HAS, HB, HBG, HBR, HEM, HERBAM, HNMN, HUEFS, HULE, HUPG, HURB, IAC, IAN, IBUG, ICN, INB, INPA, J (incl. BNRH), JAR, JBSD, K, L, LE, LOJA, LPB, MA, MAPR, MBM, MBML, MEXU, MG, MICH, MO, MPUC, NEU, NH, NHA, NO, NPB, NU (incl. NPB, PCE, and UNDH), NX, NY, P, PH, PMSP, PORT, PRE, R, RB (incl. GUA), QMEX, RFA, S, SCP, SI, SP, SPF, TANG, TEFH, U, UAMIZ, UCR, UEC, UJAT, UMSA, UNDH, UPCB, UPRRP, US, USZ, V, VEN, VIES, VRJ, VT, W, WSY, XAL, and ZT (herbaria acronyms according to Thiers 2025). General terminology follows Pellegrini (2017, 2018); the indumentum and shapes terminology follows Radford et al. (1974); the inflorescence terminology and morphology follow Weberling (1965, 1989) and Panigo et al. (2011); the fruit terminology follows Spjut (1994) and Joseph and Nampy (2012); and the seed terminology follows Faden (1991) and Joseph and Nampy (2012). For the pollen terminology, see the Palynology section below. The species’ distribution is based on herbarium materials, field observations, literature, and data extracted from iNaturalist.org (2025) and GBIF.org (2025). To support distribution data for the accepted species, we provide a selected specimen list with one voucher per country or subdivision where they occur. The conservation statuses were proposed in accordance with the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (IUCN 2012) and the recommendations of the IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee (2024). GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011) was used to calculate the Extent of Occurrence (EOO) and the Area of Occurrence (AOO). The nomenclature of wild (non-cultivated) names follows the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN; Turland et al. 2025). Vernacular names were compiled from herbarium labels, the literature, and from informal conversations with locals and/or cultivators.

Palynology

A comprehensive palynological database was compiled by Pellegrini (2017) based on data from Poole and Hunt (1980), Hunt (1983), and the Palynological Database (PalDat.org 2025), which serves as the basis for the palynological discussions and comments in the present study. The descriptions and illustrations were made based on previously published data from Poole and Hunt (1980) and the Palynological Database (PalDat.org 2025). The previously unpublished palynological data from Hunt (1983) are published here for the first time, although with considerable improvements and updates, and a completely new discussion and interpretation. The terminology of Poole and Hunt (1980) and Hunt (1983) was updated in accordance with Punt et al. (2007) and Halbritter et al. (2018).

Pollen grain axis size (i.e. P - polar axis, E - equatorial axis) was based on Poole and Hunt (1980), Hunt (1983), and illustrations from Halbritter and Buchner (2016) and Brkic (2022). For the palynological descriptions, measurements follow the structure of “min. (x ± sx) max.”, where “min.” represents the lowest and “max.” represents the highest sample values of the confidence interval, “x” represents the arithmetic mean, and “sx” represents the average standard deviation.

Horticulture

One of us (AR) is the International Cultivar Registration Authority (ICRA) for Commelinaceae and holds the UK National Plant Collection of tender Tradescantia cultivars. The collection includes specimens of every established cultivar of T. spathacea s.l. (incl. the newly recognised T. concolor), which were observed and described. Cultivar names were determined in accordance with the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants (ICNCP; Brickell et al. 2016). The overall methodology follows Rowe (2025). A continuously updated version of the Tradescantia cultivar list is available on the Tradescantia Hub website (Tradescantia.uk 2025). For the recognised cultivated taxa, we only cite herbarium vouchers when these were collected in the wild. The reason for this choice is threefold: 1) we do not provide detailed descriptions for cultivars, since they do not deviate considerably from wild taxa; 2) cultivated specimens, especially of non-wild-occurring cultivars, do not contribute to distribution data; and 3) the ICNCP does not require voucher or type specimens for the valid publications of new cultivated taxa.

Taxonomic treatment

Tradescantia subg. Campelia (Rich.) M.Pell. (Pellegrini 2017: 51)

Fig. 1

Tradescantia sect. Campelia (Rich.) D.R.Hunt (Hunt 1986a: 404)

Campelia Rich. (Richard 1808: 46)

Zanonia Cramer (Cramer 1803: 75), nom. illeg. non Zanonia L.

Type species

Zanonia bibracteata Cramer, nom. superfl. (= Tradescantia zanonia (L.) Sw.).

Description

See Pellegrini (2017).

Distribution

Tradescantia subg. Campelia is the most widespread subgenus, extending from Mexico through Central America, the Antilles, and South America. In South America, it is distributed along the Andes, extending into the Amazon Forest and Atlantic Forest biomes, but skipping most of the South American seasonal biomes (e.g. the Caatinga, Cerrado, Chaco, Pampa, and Pantanal biomes; Fig. 1). The overall distribution of T. subg. Campelia recognised in the present study differs slightly from the one presented by Pellegrini (2017). This more accurate distribution results from the exclusion of dubious, cultivated, and invasive species records, made possible only by our ongoing and meticulous investigations of the horticulturally important species T. spathacea, T. zanonia, and T. zebrina.

Figure 1. 

Distribution map for Tradescantia subg. Campelia. Purple – Tradescantia sect. Campelia; White dots – Tradescantia sect. Corinna; Hatched purple – Tradescantia sect. Cymbispatha; Lilac – Tradescantia sect. Rhoeo.

Out of the four recognised sections, T. sect. Rhoeo is the most narrowly distributed one, with T. sect. Corinna being mostly Mesoamerican (but reaching southern Mexico), and T. sect. Cymbispatha extending from Mexico to Central America and the Andean region of South America. Finally, T. sect. Campelia is the most widely distributed section, with its distribution corresponding to that of the entire subgenus.

Notes

Due to the estimated species richness (ca 30 species; Marco Pellegrini pers. obs.) and known morphological variation within Tradescantia subg. Campelia, we propose its subdivision into four sections: 1) T. sect. Campelia; 2) T. sect. Corinna; 3) T. sect. Cymbispatha; and 4) T. sect. Rhoeo. This facilitates systematic efforts within this taxonomically complex and morphologically diverse group (Pellegrini 2017), which also includes the most commonly cultivated species in the genus.

Tradescantia sect. Corinna, T. sect. Cymbispatha, and T. sect. Rhoeo match the circumscription proposed by Hunt (1986a), while T. sect. Campelia is expanded to include T. sect. Zebrina sensu Hunt (1986a). To facilitate their characterisation and recognition, we provide an identification key to the sections of T. subg. Campelia. Detailed descriptions, comments, maps, illustrations, and further taxonomic updates will be provided for each section in their respective taxonomic accounts (Pellegrini et al. in prep.). This is made necessary due to the convoluted taxonomic and nomenclatural history of these sections and the included taxa.

Key to the sections of Tradescantia subg. Campelia

1. Monopodial rosette herbs; ptyxis convolute; leaf-blades adaxially evenly coloured, hypodermis adaxial and abaxial, multiseriate, margin glabrous; sepals subequal, connectives obdeltoid, anther sacs elliptic, ovary 1-ovulate, stigma truncate; fruits 1-seeded; glandular microhairs with cells ca as wide as long, macrohairs absent (except for staminal moniliform hairs) T. sect. Rhoeo
Sympodial or monopodial diffuse herbs; ptyxis involute; leaf-blades commonly adaxially variegated (with silver aerenchyma stripes or vinaceous to maroon anthocyanin spots), hypodermis abaxial, uniseriate, sometimes restricted to the midvein, margin ciliate with acicular hairs or scabrid with prickle hairs; sepals unequal, connectives cordate to sagittate to linearly-tapered, anther sacs round, ovary 2-ovulate, stigma capitulate to capitate to trilobate; fruits 2-seeded; glandular microhairs with cells longer than wide, macrohairs present (the acicular ones with a bulbous basal cell) 2
2. When present, supernumerary bract(s) spathaceous, smaller or equal to the cincinnus bracts; sepals basally connate to completely connate, all stamens free or epipetalous, stigmatic papillae longer than 1 μm; chromosomes with asymmetric complements T. sect. Campelia
When present, supernumerary bract(s) leaf-like, larger than the cincinnus bracts; all sepals free or only the lateral ones connate, outer stamens free, inner stamens epipetalous at least at base, stigmatic papillae up to 1 μm long; chromosomes with symmetric complements 3
3. Inflorescences sessile, supernumerary bracts with an open saccate sheath, cincinnus bracts free from each other, with an open saccate sheath, bracteoles spathaceous; pedicel shorter than 1/2 the length of the floral bud, not gibbous, flowers tubular, dorsal sepal free, lateral ones connate, dorsal sepal not keeled or only slightly so, petals clawed, filaments fused to the petal claw throughout T. sect. Corinna
Inflorescences pedunculate to long-pedunculate, when present supernumerary bracts lacking a sheath, basally fused to the cincinnus bracts, cincinnus bracts basally fused, saccate or not but lacking a sheath, bracteoles scale-like; pedicel ca the same length as or longer than the floral bud, gibbous at apex, flowers flat, all sepals free, dorsal sepal distinctly keeled, petals sessile, filaments fused to the petal at base T. sect. Cymbispatha

Tradescantia sect. Rhoeo (Hance) D.R.Hunt (Hunt 1986a: 401)

Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Rhoeo Hance (Hance 1852: 659)

Rhaeo C.B.Clarke (Clarke 1881: 316), orth. var.

Type species

Tradescantia discolor L’Hér. (= T. spathacea Sw.).

Description

Herbs chamaephytes, robust, bromelioid to dracaenoid rosettes, solitary to clump-forming, monopodial, perennial, succulent, terrestrial, rupicolous or epiphytic, base definite; glandular microhairs with basal cell with a short neck, ca as wide as long, medial cell barrel-shaped, ca as wide as long, apex slightly wider than base, apical cell widely ellipsoid to obovoid, ca as wide as long, ca as wide as to slightly wider than the medial cell, apex acute, macrohairs absent (except for staminal moniliform hairs). Roots thin, fibrous. Stems ascending to erect, base becoming prostrate in older individuals, robust, succulent, unbranched, sometimes branched at base, rarely branching elsewhere due to damage to the apical bud, rooting at base or the nodes touching the substrate; internodes inconspicuous to elongate, becoming distally shorter, glabrous. Leaves spirally-alternate or pseudoverticillate, congested at the apex of the stem, sessile, glaucous when young, especially abaxially; sheaths succulent, slightly flaccid, glabrous, sometimes marcescent along the stems; ptyxis convolute; blades loriform to linear-lanceolate to narrowly lanceolate, slightly narrowed to constricted towards the base (but not forming a pseudopetiole), flat or conduplicate to canulate, succulent, cartilaginous, especially along the margin, glabrous on both sides, base symmetric, cuneate to truncate, margin flat, glabrous, apex acute to acuminate; midvein conspicuous or not, secondary veins inconspicuous, becoming more evident on both sides when dry. Synflorescences composed of a solitary main florescence or a main florescence and 1–3 coflorescences, axillary; synflorescence stems short, internodes short, glabrous; synflorescence leaves (peduncle bracts) present or not, if present bracteose. Inflorescences consisting of a shortly-pedunculate to pedunculate main florescence, internally mucilaginous; basal bract inconspicuous, tubular, hyaline, glabrous; peduncle glabrous; supernumerary bracts sometimes present, sheath absent; main axis inconspicuous; cincinnus bracts equal to unequal to each other, spathaceous, free, overlapping or not, conduplicate, straight to falcate, glabrous on both sides, base saccate or not, margin glabrous; cincinni 2, sessile, contracted, opposite, fused back-to-back into a double-cincinni, double-cincinni many-flowered; bracteoles spathaceous, enclosing the cincinnus, membranous, hyaline, glabrous. Flowers bisexual, slightly zygomorphic due to the unequal sepals, flat; floral buds oblongoid, glabrous, apex acute; pedicels succulent to spongy, glabrous, apically not gibbous, recurved at pre- and post-anthesis, erect to gently recurved at anthesis; sepals 3, free, subequal, the dorsal one slightly larger than the lateral ones, navicular, membranous or chartaceous, dorsally keeled or not, hyaline to semi-opaque, white to light green, glabrous, base obtuse to cuneate, margin entire, hyaline, apex acute, cucullate or not, becoming marcescent in fruit; petals 3, equal, free, sessile, flat, white, base obtuse, margin entire to minutely and unevenly lacerate, apex acute to obtuse; stamens 6, in two whorls, subequal, the outer whorl shorter than the inner one, filaments free from the petals and each other, straight at anthesis and post-anthesis, white, bearded on the lower 1/2 with moniliform hairs, hairs shorter than 1/2 the length of the filament, white, anthers basifixed, connective obdeltoid, apex truncate to slightly emarginate, anther sacs elliptic, divergent, pollen white to cream-coloured in vivo; ovary sessile, widely oblongoid to subglobose, white, smooth, glabrous, 3-locular, locules equal, 1-ovulate, ovules uniseriate, style cylindrical throughout, straight, white, stigma truncate, pistil shorter than the stamens. Capsules dehiscent, 3-valved, oblongoid to widely oblongoid to subglobose, smooth, glabrous, apex apiculate due to the persistent style base. Seeds (0–)1 per locule, narrowly oblong to oblong to oblong-elliptic, cleft towards the embryotega, ventrally flattened, exarillate, farinose, farinae white, testa divided into two regions (an outer rim and a large central region around the embryotega); embryotega semilateral, conspicuous, without a prominent apicule, apex obtuse, gently curved towards the cleft; hilum linear to gently curved, inside a deep and narrow groove.

Palynological description

Pollen grains released as monads, medium-sized (P - 17.4–45.4 × E - 24.4–53.3 µm), heteropolar, oblate, outline elliptic in polar view, outline flattened-convex or biconvex in equatorial view, dry pollen boat-shaped. Aperture 1-sulcate, anasulcate; sulcus long and broad (26.7–56.4 × 12.1–22.9 µm), 1/4 to 1/3 of the total grain surface, non-operculate, sunken when dry, membrane nanogranulate-granulate or verrucate-granulate, with perforations on the foot of the sculptural elements. Sexine ultrasculpture densely microverrucate-perforate, sparsely rugulate or rugulate-fossulate, elements reduced and more closely together in the transitional zone. Exine 1–1.5 µm thick, internally striate-rugulate; tectum tectate-perforate to semitectate, insulate, undulate (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. 

Pollen morphology of Tradescantia sect. Rhoeo. AC. Tradescantia concolor. A. General view showing the flattened-convex form, equatorial view. B. General view showing the large and broad sulcus and the microverrucate-perforate, sparsely rugulate elements, polar view. C. Detail of the verrucate-granulate and sparse nanogranulate elements. DF. Tradescantia spathacea. D. General view showing the biconvex form, equatorial view. E. General view showing two pollen grains with a large and broad sulcus and the microverrucate-perforate sexine presenting sparsely rugulate-fossulate elements, polar view (top), oblique polar view (bottom). F. Detail of the nanogranulate-granulate membrane. Scale bars: A, B, D, E = 10 µm; C, F = 1 µm. Photographs A–C by Heidemarie Hallbritter, D–F by Amra Brkic.

Distribution

Tradescantia sect. Rhoeo is naturally found only on the Yucatán Peninsula (Mexico) and surrounding areas, including Belize and Guatemala (Figs 1, 4). It is cultivated elsewhere around the globe, where it has sometimes become naturalised.

Habitat and ecology

Tradescantia sect. Rhoeo is found in lowland to submontane seasonally dry forests and rainforests. Plants are terrestrial or rupicolous, but can also be commonly found growing as epiphytes (especially T. spathacea).

Conservation and invasiveness

Tradescantia sect. Rhoeo is widely cultivated around the globe, especially in tropical regions. Out of the two recognised species, T. spathacea has sometimes become naturalised outside its native range (e.g. the West Indies, the Antilles, and Central America). However, they generally do not seem to act as aggressive and invasive weeds, unlike other species of Tradescantia (e.g. T. fluminensis Vell. and T. zebrina). The only exception appears to be T. spathacea in Australia and Florida, USA, where it is a well-established and aggressive garden escapee.

Horticulture

Horticulturally very important, being cultivated as an ornamental around the world, typically grown as an outdoor groundcover or as a houseplant in temperate climates. Tradescantia spathacea is one of the longest-cultivated species outside of T. subg. Tradescantia, and a number of cultivars have been selected for their unusual variegated foliage and/or compact size. The variegation in T. sect. Rhoeo is typically caused by chimeral albino mutations (Tradescantia.uk 2025), rather than virus infections, as initially hypothesised by Pellegrini (2017). Mutations which occur in the shoot apical meristem are reproduced and maintained as the cells divide. When a mutation causes albino cells due to a reduction or absence of chlorophyll, the chimeral mixture of mutated and normal cells in the meristem produces a visible variegated pattern in the growing leaves (Frank and Chitwood 2016). Such mutations reduce the vigour of the plant, but are often selected for ornamental horticulture. Mericlinal or marginal chimaeras have separate layers of genetically distinct cells in the meristem, which result in leaves with a consistent pattern of one colour near the margin and another colour at the base and centre. Periclinal or sectoral chimaeras have a mixture of cells within one or more meristem layers, resulting in highly variable stripes or streaks (Tradescantia.uk 2025). In addition to albino cells, non-photosynthetic pigments can produce further colour variations, which may be selected genetically or vary according to environmental conditions (Pellegrini 2017; Tradescantia.uk 2025).

Uses

The leaves of T. spathacea are cooked to extract a purple dye, which the Mayans used to colour fabrics and cosmetics (Standley and Steyermark 1952). Tradescantia spathacea (and possibly also T. concolor) is used in Mexico for the treatment of sores and wounds, as well as for its antiseptic and anti-inflammatory properties. Further traditional uses include (Prajapati et al. 2020; Butnariu et al. 2022): 1) preparations made using the whole plant as insecticide, to treat wounds, cough, and to loosen mucus; 2) root preparations to treat cold, sore throat, whooping cough, and nasal bleeding; 3) stem preparations to treat hematemesis; 4) leaf preparations to treat burn wounds, psoriasis, grazes, cough, cold, sore throat, whooping cough, nasal bleeding, asthma, dysentery, haemoptysis, tuberculosis, kidney infections, haematuria, diarrhoea, entrorrhagia, hypoglycaemia, snakebites, anxiety and depression, and as an anticonceptional; and 5) flower preparations to treat cough, fever, and bronchitis. Medical trials have also demonstrated significant medicinal potential for T. spathacea in the treatment of AIDS, breast cancer, lymphocyte stimulation, tuberculosis, and as a potent antibacterial, antiviral agent, and antioxidant (Prajapati et al. 2020; Butnariu et al. 2022).

Vernacular names

Species in this section are commonly known worldwide as Boat-lily, cradle-lily, Moses-in-the-cradle, oyster-lily, and oyster plant (English), and as Adam en Eva, barco-de-Moises, cordobán, hierba-del-cáncer, maguey blanco, magueyito blanco, niñas embarcadas, planta-de-hígado, señoritas embarcadas (Spanish). In Belize, it is known as es’chiu. In Mexico, they are known by a series of names, depending on the region and language. They are known in Mayan as chactasam / chak tsam / chak-ts’am / chactsan / chaktasan, matlali, yaxtsam / yastsana / yaxtsana / yaxtsanah / ya’axts’ana’, ta’ak / ya’ak, ts’am (country, Campeche, Quintana Roo, Tabasco, Veracruz, and Yucatán); ej pets’ (Campeche, Quintana Roo, and Yucatán); and eek’pets and chac tzab (Yucatán). In Mixe, they are known as tsa’am (country, Campeche, Tabasco, Veracruz, and Yucatán). Finally, in Mexican Spanish, they are known as hierba del cáncer, maguey, zopilotera (country), and roeo (Campeche, Quintana Roo, and Yucatán).

Etymology

From the Romanised “Rhoiṓ” of the Ancient Greek “Ῥοιώ”, derived from the Greek “ῥείω” (rheíō, meaning “to flow” or “stream”). The name might refer to two distinct female characters from Greek mythology: 1) the daughter of the Argonaut hero Staphylus (son of the wine-god Dionysus), lover of the Olympian god Apollo, and mother of Anius (Smith 1873: 178); or 2) a Trojan naiad daughter (also known as Strymo, from the Romanised “Strȳmōn” of the Ancient Greek “Στρυμών”, meaning “stream” or “river”) of the river god Scamander, wife of King Laomedon of Troy, and mother of Tithonus (Smith 1873: 390; Dindorf 1875: 154, 369). Both characters have names associated with rivers and streams, although for different reasons. However, Hance (1852: 659) provides no etymology for his name, let alone which of the two Rhoeo he might be referring to.

Nonetheless, based on the Greek mythos, it is much more likely that the name refers to the first Rhoeo. According to legend (Smith 1873: 178), when Staphylus discovered Rhoeo’s pregnancy, he believed his daughter had become pregnant by a regular man, rather than a god. Taken by rage, he placed her inside a chest and cast her out to sea. Rhoeo ended up landing on the island of Delos, which Apollo protected. It would make sense that Hance (1852) intended to make a parallel between the boat-shaped inflorescence of T. spathacea and the chest in which Rhoeo was placed. Interestingly, a similar motif can be observed in most vernacular names for members of this group (e.g. boat-lily, cradle-lily, Moses-in-the-cradle, etc.).

Palynological notes

Tradescantia sect. Rhoeo has pollen of the Tradescantia type (i.e. Type 3 sensu Poole and Hunt 1980). Poole and Hunt (1980) studied both species recognised by us as different cultivars or varieties of Rhoeo spathacea (Sw.) Stearn (ranks applied inconsistently in their study). These authors included both species in their pollen Type 3, based on the size of their pollen grains (P - 15–45 × E - 26–62 µm), “cerebroid” exine ornamentation (i.e. microverrucate-perforate sensu Halbritter et al. 2018), insulate tectum, coarsely granulate sulcal membrane, and thinner exine (1–1.5 µm thick). Nonetheless, the sulcal membrane of T. sect. Rhoeo is recorded by us as nanogranulate-granulate or verrucate-granulate, with this difference being species-specific. Poole and Hunt (1980) also highlighted the difference in polar and equatorial axis length between both species, with T. spathacea (either as R. spathacea var. spathacea or R. spathacea ‘Discolor’) having smaller pollen grains when compared to T. concolor (either as R. spathacea var. concolor or R. spathacea ‘Concolor’).

Cytology

Tradescantia sect. Rhoeo has a basic chromosome number of x = 6 (Sax 1931; Jones and Jopling 1972; Hunt 1986a; Pellegrini 2017). The complement is symmetric, consisting of metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes, which are smaller than the x = 6 chromosomes of T. subg. Mandonia, T. subg. Setcreasea, and T. subg. Tradescantia (Jones and Jopling 1972; Hunt 1986a; Pellegrini 2017). The basic chromosome number x = 6 is one of the synapomorphies supporting the clade comprising T. subg. Campelia, T. subg. Mandonia, T. subg. Setcreasea, and T. subg. Tradescantia (Pellegrini 2017).

Notes

Rhoeo was described based on Tradescantia discolor (= T. spathacea) and was recognised as a monospecific genus for almost 100 years (Hunt 1986a). The genus was proposed solely based on its 1-ovulate locules, but was most widely recognised for its succulent and bromelioid habit. However, it shares with Tradescantia the double-cincinni fused back-to-back and subtended by frondose bracts, each individual cincinnus sessile and contracted, the Tradescantia-type flower, the Tradescantia-type pollen, seeds with a linear hilum, and the basic chromosome number of x = 6 (Hunt 1986a; Pellegrini 2017). Based on these morphological similarities, Hunt (1986a) reduced Rhoeo to a section in Tradescantia.

Tradescantia sect. Rhoeo is very distinctive and easily differentiated from T. sect. Campelia, T. sect. Corinna, and T. sect. Cymbispatha due to its bromelioid to dracaenoid habit, monopodial growth, glandular microhairs with cells as wide as long, lack of macrohairs on the vegetative organs and most reproductive ones (except for the staminal hairs), robust stems, convolute ptyxis, very succulent leaves, axillary clustered synflorescences, connectives obdeltoid, and its elliptic anther sacs. It shares with T. sect. Campelia a well-developed hypodermis on both sides of the leaf-blade, with T. sect. Corinna its spathaceous bracteoles, and with T. sect. Cymbispatha its flat flowers.

Key to the species of Tradescantia sect. Rhoeo

1. Leaves pseudo-verticillate, adaxially light green to green, abaxially light green to light silvery-green, rarely olive-green; cincinnus bracts concave to navicular, base saccate; sepals chartaceous, connectives cream-coloured to pale yellow, anther sacs cream-coloured to pale pink to brownish-pink; hilum longer than 1/2 the length of (but not as long as) the seed; pollen biconvex, axis P - 21 (24.1 ± 0.3) 27 × E - 39.2 (45.2 ± 0.5) 53.3 µm, sulcus 39.5 (45.4 ± 0.7) 56.4 × 12.1 (15.8 ± 0.5) 22.9 µm, membrane nanogranulate-granulate, sexine microverrucate-perforate and sparsely rugulate-fossulate T. concolor
Leaves spirally-alternate, adaxially dark bluish-green to greyish-green to dark green to green, abaxially vinaceous to purple; cincinnus bracts conduplicate, base not saccate; sepals membranous, connectives yellow to ochre to orange-yellow, anther sacs red to maroon to brown; hilum as long as the seed; pollen flattened-convex, axis P - 17.4 (18.4 ± 0.5) 19.4 × E - 24.4 (32 ± 1) 45.4 µm, sulcus 26.7 (35.8 ± 0.7) 45.4 × 12.3 (13.9 ± 0.2) 16.2 µm, membrane verrucate-granulate with sparse nanogranules, sexine microverrucate-perforate and sparsely rugulate T. spathacea

Tradescantia concolor (Baker) M.Pell., stat. nov.

Figs 2, 3, 4

Tradescantia discolor var. concolor Baker (Baker 1868: t. 48)

Rhoeo spathacea f. concolor (Baker) Stehlé (Stehlé 1970: 77)

Type

[Illustration] Original illustration by Walter Hood Fitch at the Illustration section of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew’s Library and Archives, later published in Baker (1868: t. 48); lectotype (designated here).

Description

Herbs 10–120 m tall, 20–90 cm diam., bromelioid to dracaenoid rosettes. Stems ascending to erect, rooting at base; internodes 0.1–9.7 cm long, a very long internode followed by many inconspicuous to very short ones (causing the pseudoverticillate phyllotaxy), light green to green. Leaves pseudoverticillate; sheaths 0.8–1.9 cm long, light green to light silvery-green; blades 17.5–40 × 1.6–5.5 cm, ascending to patent, generally the larger leaves becoming deflexed with age, adaxially light green to green, abaxially light green to light silvery-green, rarely olive-green, margin light green to yellowish-green to vinaceous; midvein conspicuous or not, adaxially canaliculate, becoming inconspicuous on the upper third, abaxially inconspicuous, secondary veins 3–4 pairs, inconspicuous, becoming more evident on both sides when dry. Synflorescences composed of a solitary main florescence, rarely a main florescence and 1–2(–many) coflorescences; synflorescence internodes 0.6–4.9 cm long, cream-coloured to light green; synflorescence leaves (peduncle bracts) present or not, when present frondose to bracteose, sometimes reduced to a bladeless sheath, chartaceous to cartilaginous (frondose to bracteose) or membranous (bladeless sheath), adaxially cream-coloured to light green, abaxially cream-coloured to light green to green. Inflorescences with peduncle 1.9–3.4 cm long, light green; supernumerary bracts sometimes present, when present equal to subequal to the cincinnus bracts; cincinnus bracts 2.2–5.3 × 2.5–5.1 cm, equal to each other, trullate to widely trullate to very widely trullate, concave to navicular, overlapping or not, adaxially light green, becoming white to cream-coloured at base, light green to green along the veins and margin, abaxially green to silvery-green, becoming cream-coloured to light green to light silvery-green at base, green along the veins and margin, margin rarely speckled with pink to vinaceous, base cuneate to obtuse, saccate, apex acuminate to cuspidate, secondary veins 3–8 pairs; double-cincinni 30–50-flowered; bracteoles with base sometimes suffused with light green. Flowers with floral buds 5.3–5.8 × 3–3.5 mm, white to light green; pedicels 1.5–1.8 cm long, white to light green; sepals 4.5–6.5 × 2.5–3.5 mm, elliptic to widely elliptic to widely ovate, chartaceous, dorsally keeled, semi-opaque, white to light green, apex acute, cucullate; petals 6.5–8 × 6.5–7 mm, widely ovate to very widely ovate; stamens with filaments 6.7–8.8 mm long, anthers 0.8–1 × 0.9–1.3 mm, connective cream-coloured to pale yellow, anther sacs cream-coloured to pale pink to brownish-pink; ovary 1.9–2.5 × 1.5–2.2 mm, style 2.7–3.9 mm long. Capsules 3.8–5.2 × 2.7–4.9 mm, widely oblongoid to subglobose, when immature light green to green, becoming greenish-brown to tan-coloured when mature. Seeds 2.9–4.5 × 1.6–2.3 mm, oblong to oblong-elliptic, densely farinose, outer rim scrobiculate, ridges radiating from the embryotega, central testa smooth or almost so.

Palynological description

Pollen biconvex in equatorial view. Axis P - 21 (24.1 ± 0.3) 27 × E - 39.2 (45.2 ± 0.5) 53.3 µm. Sulcus 39.5 (45.4 ± 0.7) 56.4 × 12.1 (15.8 ± 0.5) 22.9 µm, membrane nanogranulate-granulate. Sexine ultrasculpture microverrucate-perforate, sparsely rugulate-fossulate. Exine 1 (1.4 ± 0.1) 1.5 µm thick; tectum tectate-perforate to semitectate (Fig. 2A–C).

Distribution

Tradescantia concolor is restricted to the Yucatán Peninsula and surrounding areas, occurring in Belize, Guatemala, and Mexico (Campeche, Chiapas, Tabasco, Quintana Roo, and Yucatán) (Fig. 4).

Habitat and ecology

Tradescantia concolor can be found growing from 20 to 600 m a.s.l. in lowland to lower montane rainforests and seasonally dry forests, as terrestrial or rupicolous, more rarely as an epiphyte.

Phenology

Tradescantia concolor flowers and fruits profusely throughout the year if conditions are suitable, especially in cultivation. In the wild, it is most frequently found in bloom and fruit from September to March. It flowers commonly in cultivation, including as an indoor container plant, without any apparent requirement for seasonal or environmental triggers. It is self-compatible, readily producing viable seeds even when isolated (Avery Rowe pers. obs.).

Vernacular names

Commonly known in Mexico (Spanish) as maguey blanco and maguey verde (Campeche, Quintana Roo, and Yucatán).

Etymology

Derives from the combination of the Latin prefix “con-” (indicating “completeness”) + “color”, in reference to its completely green leaves.

Preliminary IUCN conservation assessment

Tradescantia concolor possesses a wide EOO (ca 211,075 km2) and AOO (ca 392 km2). It is still consistently observed in the wild, forming medium- to large-sized subpopulations. Thus, following the IUCN (2012) criteria and the IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee (2024) recommendations, we suggest that it be considered Least Concern (LC, criterion B).

Figure 3. 

Tradescantia concolor. A. Habit showing the erect and elongated stems, and pseudo-verticillate leaves. B. Detail of the stem showing the pseudo-verticillate phyllotaxy and axillary inflorescences. C. Detail of the leaf sheaths. D. Detail of the adaxial side of the leaf blade showing the characteristic dark green colouration with yellowish-green margin. E. Detail of the abaxial side of the leaf blade showing the characteristic green colouration. F. Detail of the inflorescence showing the non-overlapping cincinnus bracts with a saccate base and an immature fruit exserted from the bracts. G. Front view of a flower showing the membranous sepals. H. Detail of the anther showing the obdeltoid yellow connective and red to maroon anther sacs. I. Detail of the style showing the truncate stigma. J. Immature capsule with a mature seed showing the seed’s oblong outline, semi-lateral embryotega, and linear hilum slightly shorter than the seed. Photographs A–B, E by Philip K. Nelson; C–D, J by Avery Rowe; F, H–I by Jim Conrad.

Selected examined material

MEXICO – Campeche • Hopelchen, 5 km S of centre of Hopelchen along road to Dzibalchen; 30 Dec. 1985; fl., fr.; M. Nee 32389; NY, US, XAL. – Chiapas • Ocosingo, Nuevo Guerrero; 11 Apr. 2002; fl.; G. Aguilar M. 490; MEXU. – Quintana Roo • Felipe Carillo, Puerto, Lag. Chichankanab; 26 Mar. 1984; fl.; J.J. Ortiz 478; CICY, MEXU, XAL. – Tabasco • Tenosique, 10 km de Tenosique, a 100 m de la antena; 19 Feb. 1983; fl.; Zamudio et al. 259; CASAT, MEXU. – Veracruz • Soteapan, San Fernando; 16 Oct. 1999; fl.; M. Leonti 90; MEXU. – Yucatán • Tekax, Cueva de Akil, 8 km al O de Akil, enfrente de la bomba de riego; 3 Aug. 1997; fl.; G. Ibarra-Manríquez et al. 4133; MEXU.

BELIZE – Belize • Gracie Rock, 1.5 miles S of Mile 22 on Western Highway; 4–5 Jun. 1973; fl., fr.; T.B. Croat 23833; MO, US. – Cayo • Line Transect 1, West of Hummingbird Highway, 7 miles S of junction with Western Highway; 8 Aug. 1970; fl., fr.; D.L. Spellman & W.W. Newey 1977; MO. – Corozal • s.loc.; 1931–1932; fl., fr.; P.H. Gentle 355; F, US. – Orange Walk • Honey Camp; Nov. 1928; fl., fr.; C.L. Lundell 102; K, US. – Stann Creek • Humming Bird Highway, high ridge, base of hill, Humming Bird Gap; 15 Aug. 1956; fl., fr.; P.H. Gentle 9215; F, K. – Toledo • Las Sierritas, 20 km west of Big Creek Settlement, eastern slopes of Cerrito, the tallest hill in Las Sierritas; 4 Dec. 1997; fl., fr.; T. Hawkins 1617; MEXU, MO, US, VRJ.

GUATEMALA – El Petén • San José, NW shore of Lake Petén Itzá, between Nuevo San José and La Providencia/Trinidad; 15 Dec. 1994; fl., fr.; B. Wallnöfer 9617; MO, W, U.

Notes

Tradescantia concolor was initially deemed to only represent a variation in leaf colouration of T. spathacea. However, in addition to the morphological differences highlighted in the key, both species also differ in their distribution and ecological preferences (Fig. 4). Pollen morphology also differs between both species, with T. concolor having larger [P - 21 (24.1 ± 0.3) 27 × E - 39.2 (45.2 ± 0.5) 53.3 µm] and biconvex grains, smaller sulcus [39.5 (45.4 ± 0.7) 56.4 × 12.1 (15.8 ± 0.5) 22.9 µm], different membrane ornamentation (nanogranulate-granulate), sexine with distinct ornamentation (microverrucate-perforate, sparsely rugulate-fossulate), and generally thicker exine [1 (1.4 ± 0.1) 1.5 µm]. Finally, despite being partially sympatric with T. spathacea and exhibiting overlap in phenology, no naturally occurring intermediate specimens have been observed or reported, which suggests that they do not hybridise. This further supports the recognition of two distinct entities.

Horticulture and cultivars

Tradescantia concolor has historically been recognised as either a variety, a form, or, in the past 40 years, as a cultivar (i.e. Tradescantia spathacea ‘Concolor’). Cultivated specimens are generally unnamed wild forms. The species’ characteristic growth form and phyllotaxy may not be evident in cultivation, especially when plants are grown in smaller pots or plots, due to pruning long or leafless stems.

Figure 4. 

Distribution map for Tradescantia sect. Rhoeo. Green – Tropical and Subtropical Moist Broadleaf Forests; Pale Yellow – Tropical and Subtropical Dry Broadleaf Forests; Brown – Tropical and Subtropical Coniferous Forests; Red – Deserts and Xeric Shrublands; Teal – Mangroves and Coastal Environments.

Figure 5. 

Tradescantia spathacea. A. Habit, showing the erect and elongated stem, and plantlets at the base of the mother plant. B. Detail of the stem showing the marcescent leaf sheaths and secondary roots. C. Detail of the stem showing the spirally-alternate phyllotaxy with leaves congested at the apex of the stem. D. Detail of the adaxial side of the leaf blade showing the characteristic dark green colouration with vinaceous margin. E. Detail of the abaxial side of the leaf blade showing the characteristic vinaceous colouration. F. Inflorescence showing the presence of one supernumerary bract and overlapping cincinnus bracts with non-saccate base. G. Detail of the inflorescence with partially removed cincinnus bracts showing the spathaceous and membranous bracteoles and flower buds, flowers, and fruits in various stages of development. H. Front view of a flower showing the membranous sepals. I. Detail of the anther showing the obdeltoid yellow connective and red to maroon anther sacs. J. Detail of the style showing the truncate stigma. K. Immature capsule with a mature seed showing the seed’s narrowly elliptic outline, semi-lateral embryotega, and linear hilum as long as the seed. Photographs by Marco O.O. Pellegrini.

Cultivation requirements are flexible, and a range of soil types, light levels, and temperatures is tolerated. Container-grown specimens are susceptible to rot from excess moisture but are highly tolerant of drought. Growth is rapid, and propagation is easily achieved through stem cuttings, which also results in the production of numerous plantlets below the cut.

Tradescantia concolor ‘Vittata’ Winn & Frieling (Winn and Frieling 1984: 17)

Recognition

Leaves adaxially light green to green to olive-green, variegated with yellow stripes, abaxially olive-green.

Origin

Cultivar of unknown origin, most likely lost from cultivation, as it has not been documented since it was first described.

Notes

The Latin name would not be commonly considered valid following the ICNCP (Brickell et al. 2016). However, it is accepted by an ICRA decision as the plant has not been given any other names.

Tradescantia spathacea Sw. (Swartz 1788: 57)

Figs 2, 46

Rhoeo spathacea (Sw.) Stearn (Stearn 1957: 198) – Type: same as for Tradescantia spathacea.

Tradescantia discolor L’Hér. (L’Héritier de Brutelle 1789: 5, t. 12) – Type: s.loc. • America calidá, cultivated at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, from a plant potentially originating from Nicaragua; 1787; fl.; s.col. s.n.; lectotype (designated here): K [K000363274!].

Tradescantia discolor L’Hér. var. discolor (L’Héritier de Brutelle 1789: 5, t. 12) – Type: same as for Tradescantia discolor.

Tradescantia versicolor Salisb. (Salisbury 1796: 216), nom. superfl. – Type: same as for Tradescantia discolor.

Ephemerum discolor (L’Hér.) Moench (Moench 1802: 78) – Type: same as for Tradescantia discolor.

Rhoeo discolor (L’Hér.) Hance (Hance 1852: 660) – Type: same as for Tradescantia discolor.

Tradescantia discolor var. lineata Miq. ex Verschaff. (Verschaffelt 1857: 5) – Type: MEXICO – Quintana Roo • Chetumal, 6.5–7 km N of Tomás Garrido on the road which joins Highway 186 W of Nicolas Bravo; 15 Mar. 1990; fl., fr.; A.C. Sanders et al. 9921; neotype (designated here): US [US00292627!]; isoneotype: UCR [no. 62683!].

Tradescantia discolor var. variegata Hook. (Hooker 1858: t. 5079) – Type: [Illustration] Original illustration by John Bellenden Kew Gawler at the Illustration section of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew’s Library and Archives, later published in Hooker (1858: t. 5079); lectotype (designated here).

Rhoeo spathacea f. variegata (Hook.) Stehlé (Stehlé 1970: 77) – Type: same as for Tradescantia discolor var. variegata.

Tradescantia discolor var. vittata Laurentius ex Regel (Regel 1868: 26) – Type: s.loc., cultivated at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, of unknown wild origin; 23 Jul. 1963; fl.; H.A. Hodson 4; neotype (designated here): K [K003355761!].

Tradescantia discolor var. vittata Laurentius (Laurentius 1859: 6), nom. nud.

Tradescantia agavaefolia hort. ex H.Wildpret” (K003355740), nom. not validly publ.

Ephemerum bicolor Moench (Moench 1802: 78), orth. var. (= Ephemerum discolor (L’Hér.) Moench).

Type

MEXICO – Campeche • San Francisco de Campeche, cultivated at the West Indies (most likely Jamaica); 1784–1786; fl.; O.P. Swartz s.n.; lectotype (designated here): S [S-R-6172!]; isolectotype: S [S07-10830!].

Description

Herbs 10–60 cm tall, 10–70 cm diam., bromelioid rosettes. Stems ascending to erect, base becoming prostrate in older individuals, rooting at base or the nodes touching the substrate; internodes 0.2–3.1 cm long, distally shorter, light green to green to dark green or vinaceous to purple. Leaves spirally-alternate; sheaths (1–)1.6–3.4 cm long, green to cream-coloured to pink to purplish-pink becoming vinaceous to purple towards the apex; blades 15.3–35.2 × 2.4–6.8 cm, ascending to patent, adaxially dark bluish-green to greyish-green to dark green to green, abaxially vinaceous to purple, margin vinaceous to purple; midvein slightly conspicuous to conspicuous, adaxially impressed to canaliculate, becoming slightly prominent on the upper third, abaxially slightly prominent, round, secondary veins 3–5 pairs, inconspicuous, becoming more evident on both sides when dry. Synflorescences composed of a solitary main florescence or a main florescence and 1–4(–many) coflorescences; synflorescence internodes 0.6–3.9 cm long, light green to cream-coloured to purplish-pink; synflorescence leaves (peduncle bracts) present, bracteose or reduced to a bladeless sheath, chartaceous, adaxially cream-coloured to light green, abaxially green suffused with pink to vinaceous. Inflorescences with peduncle 1.1–4.5 cm long, light green to cream-coloured to pale pink; supernumerary bracts present, sometimes absent, when present much narrower than the cincinnus bracts, otherwise similar; cincinnus bracts 1.9–4.8 × 1.9–6.9 cm, subequal to unequal to each other, widely trullate to very widely trullate to rhombic to transversally trullate, conduplicate, overlapping, adaxially light green to green, becoming cream-coloured to light green towards the basal third, pink to vinaceous along the veins and margin, abaxially pink to purplish-pink to vinaceous to purple, becoming cream-coloured to pale pink towards the basal third, vinaceous to purple along the veins and margin, base cuneate to obtuse to truncate, not saccate, apex acute to acuminate; double-cincinni 10–50-flowered; bracteoles with base suffused with light green, apex suffused with pale pink. Flowers with floral buds 2.8–5.5 × 1.2–3.5 mm, light green to white to pale pink; pedicels 0.8–1.7 cm long, white to light green or pale pink to pale reddish-pink; sepals 3.2–5.9 × 1.7–3.6 mm, oblong to lanceolate to ovate, membranous, not dorsally keeled, hyaline to semi-opaque, light green to white to pale pink, apex acute, straight; petals 4.6–8.1 × 4.3–7.8 mm, widely trullate to very widely trullate to rhombic; stamens with filaments 4.4–8.3 mm long, anthers 0.5–0.8 × 0.7–1.3 mm, connective yellow to ochre to orange-yellow, anther sacs red to maroon to brown; ovary 1.3–2.2 × 1.2–1.7 mm, style 1.9–4.7 mm long. Capsules 2.2–4.2 × 1.7–2.8 mm, oblongoid, when immature pink to reddish-pink to vinaceous, becoming tan-coloured when mature. Seeds 1.8–3.7 × 1–1.7 mm, narrowly oblong to oblong-elliptic, sparsely farinose to farinose, farinae white, outer rim conspicuously scrobiculate, ridges continuous to the ones from the central testa, central testa faintly scrobiculate, ridges radiating from the embryotega.

Palynological description

Pollen flattened-convex in equatorial view. Axis P - 17.4 (18.4 ± 0.5) 19.4 × E - 24.4 (32 ± 1) 45.4 µm. Sulcus 26.7 (35.8 ± 0.7) 45.4 × 12.3 (13.9 ± 0.2) 16.2 µm, membrane verrucate-granulate with sparse nanogranules. Sexine ultrasculpture microverrucate-perforate, sparsely rugulate. Exine 1 (1.1 ± 0.1) 1.25 µm thick; tectum tectate-perforate (Fig. 2D–F).

Distribution

Tradescantia spathacea is restricted in the wild to the Yucatán Peninsula and surrounding areas, occurring in Belize, Guatemala, and Mexico (Campeche, Chiapas, Oaxaca, Quintana Roo, Tabasco, Veracruz, and Yucatán) (Fig. 4). It is naturalised in Cuba, the Antilles, the West Indies, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama, and widely cultivated elsewhere. It is very frequently found growing around ancient Mayan sites, as it was domesticated for the production of purple dye (Standley and Steyermark 1952).

Habitat and ecology

Tradescantia spathacea can be found growing from 0–600 m a.s.l. in lowland to lower montane rainforests, more commonly as terrestrial or rupicolous, but also as an epiphyte.

Phenology

Tradescantia spathacea flowers and fruits profusely throughout the year if conditions are suitable, especially in cultivation. In the wild, it is most frequently found in bloom and fruit from October to June. Wild forms of T. spathacea flower readily in cultivation, including as indoor container plants, without any apparent requirement for seasonal or environmental triggers. It is strongly to partially self-compatible, with some individuals and populations showing lower pollination success, fruit formation and seed set in selfed flowers. This is supported by cultivation observations by two of us. Plants cultivated by MOOP were found to be highly self-compatible, with over 70% of flowers developing into fruits and consistently setting viable seeds. Alternatively, plants cultivated by AR had a low fruit set rate when in isolation, with fruits producing (0–)1–2 fertile seeds due to abortion.

Vernacular names

Commonly known in Mexico (Spanish) as maguey morado and maguey rojo (Campeche, Quintana Roo, and Yucatán).

Etymology

From the combination of the Greek “σπάθη” (spáthē, meaning “broad blade”) + the suffix “-āceā” (indicating “resemblance” or “similarity”) in reference to the spathe-like cincinnus bracts.

Preliminary IUCN conservation assessment

Tradescantia spathacea has a wide EOO (ca 521,395 km2) and AOO (ca 1,328 km2). It is consistently observed in the wild, forming large subpopulations, in addition to being widely cultivated around the world, even becoming slightly invasive in several countries. Thus, following the IUCN (2012) criteria and the IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee (2024) recommendations, we suggest that it be considered Least Concern (LC, criterion B).

Selected examined material

MEXICO – Campeche • Hopelchén, Jardín Botánico de Zoh-Laguna a 10 km al N de Xpujil, camino a Dzibachén; 22 Jul. 1996; fl., fr.; P. Alvaro M. 405; MEXU. – Chiapas • Ocosingo, a 12 km al NO del Crucero de Bonampak; 12 Feb. 2003; fl., fr.; G. Aguilar M. & C. Chancayun 5595; MEXU. – Oaxaca • St. Maria Petapa, jardin de Sra. Crisofora; 14 Sep. 1992; fl.; B. Frei 142; FB, MEXU, ZT. – Quintana Roo • Carretera Chetumal-Escárcega, a 4 km de la desviación de Chetumal; 25 Sep. 2004; fl., fr.; R. Duno de Stefano & B. Torke 2017; CICY, MEXU. – Tabasco • Nacajuca, Tapotzinfo cerca de Masateupa, al norte de Nacajuca; 17 Jan. 1979; fl.; A. Martínez & C. Cowan 1891; MEXU. – Veracruz • Cercanias de San Andres Tuxtla; Jun. 1955; fl.; Dr. Sandoval s.n.; MEXU [MEXU no. 6819]. – Yucatán • Izamal, Walls of Cenotes and ruins; Jun. 1916; fl.; G.F. Gaumer et al. 23381; F, MA, MO, US.

BELIZE – Cayo • Near Terra Nova Forest reserve, ca 21 km N of Black Man Eddy Village and the Belize River; 5 Jul. 1995; fl., fr.; D.E. Atha et al. 974; K, NY. – Orange Walk • Honey Camp; Nov. 1928; fl., fr.; C.L. Lundell 101; K, US. – Toledo • Dolores, ca 40 km SW of Punta Gorda; 1 Feb. 1990; fl., fr.; M.J. Balick et al. 2570; NY, US.

GUATEMALA – El Petén • Uaxactún; 23 Apr. 1931; fl., fr.; H.H. Bartlett 12701; MICH, US.

Notes

Tradescantia spathacea is likely the most well-known species in the genus, easily recognised by its bromelioid habit, strongly discolourous leaves, axillary inflorescences with large boat-shaped bracts, and small, white flowers barely exserted from the bracts. Pollen grains of T. spathacea are smaller [P - 17.4 (18.4 ± 0.5) 19.4 × E - 24.4 (32 ± 1) 45.4 µm] and flattened-convex, with a longer but narrower sulcus [26.7 (35.8 ± 0.7) 45.4 × 12.3 (13.9 ± 0.2) 16.2 µm], membrane verrucate-granulate with sparse nanogranules, sexine microverrucate-perforate and sparsely rugulate, and generally thinner exine [1 (1.1 ± 0.1) 1.25 µm].

Horticulture and cultivars

Tradescantia spathacea is one of the oldest cultivated species in the genus. Natural wild forms of the species are now rare in cultivation, and the majority of cultivated specimens belong to the miniature-sized Bantam Group, established here. Most cultivars are selected for their variegated foliage, which seems to display a range of chimeral albino mutations. We accept six cultivars for T. spathacea, with five of these representing miniature forms, for which we establish a new Group.

Cultivation requirements are flexible, and a range of soil types, light levels, and temperatures is tolerated. Container-grown specimens are susceptible to root and stem rot from excess moisture, but are highly tolerant of drought. Growth is rapid, and propagation is easily achieved through stem cuttings, which also results in the production of numerous plantlets below the cut.

Tradescantia spathacea ‘Vittata’ Laurentius (Laurentius 1859: 6)

Fig. 6A–C

Tradescantia spathacea ‘Vittata’ Laurentius (Laurentius 1859: 6) – based on Tradescantia discolor var. vittata Laurentius, nom. nud. (≡ Tradescantia discolor var. vittata Laurentius ex Regel).

Tradescantia spathacea ‘Lineata’ Miq. ex Verschaff. (Verschaffelt 1857: 5) – based on Tradescantia discolor var. lineata Miq. ex Verschaff.

Tradescantia spathacea ‘Variegata’ Hook. (Hooker 1858: t. 5079) – based on Tradescantia discolor var. variegata Hook.

Tradescantia spathacea ‘Striata’ Rinz & J.Rinz (Rinz and Rinz 1862: 67).

Tradescantia spathacea ‘Aurea’ Nanz & Neuner (Nanz and Neuner 1888: 50).

Recognition

Habit same as the wild form; leaves adaxially dark olive-green, with longitudinal yellow stripes, abaxially vinaceous to purple; flowers same as the wild form, except for the sterile pollen; fruits and seeds never produced.

Phenology

Flowers commonly. However, pollen appears sterile, and seeds are never produced.

Origin

Collected in the wild in Quintana Roo (Mexico).

Selected examined material

MEXICO – Quintana Roo • Chetumal, 6.5–7 km N of Tomás Garrido on the road which joins Highway 186 W of Nicolas Bravo; 15 Mar. 1990; fl., fr.; A.C. Sanders et al. 9921; US, UCR.

Notes

An ICRA decision was made to accept the name ‘Vittata’, despite ‘Variegata’ having priority, since it has become the most universally used name (Brickell et al. 2016, Art. 29.2). Under the ICN (Turland et al. 2025, Art. 38.1), Laurentius (1859: 6) does not meet the basic requirements of the valid publication of T. discolor var. vittata, with the requirements only being met nine years later by Regel (1868: 26), who provided a Latin diagnosis. Nonetheless, under the ICNCP (Brickell et al. 2016, Art. 27.1), the basic requirements for the valid publication of a cultivar name are met. Thus, if the taxon is accepted as a variety, T. discolor var. vittata Laurentius ex Regel is the correct author for this name, with T. discolor var. variegata Hooker (1858: t. 5079) being the earliest available name at the varietal rank. However, the recognition of this taxon as a variety would require a new combination under T. spathacea. Alternatively, if accepted as a cultivar (as in the present study), T. spathacea ‘Vittata’ Laurentius is the correct name and author for this biological entity.

Figure 6. 

Cultivars of Tradescantia spathacea. AC. T. spathacea ‘Vittata’. A. Habit. B. Upper view of an inflorescence showing two open flowers. C. Detail of a solitary synflorescence. DH. T. spathacea Bantam Group. D. Habit of T. spathacea ‘Dwarf’. E. Habit of T. spathacea ‘Cream’. F. Habit of T. spathacea ‘HANSOTI02’. G. Habit of T. spathacea ‘Lemon Sunset’. H. Habit of T. spathacea ‘Sitara’. Photographs by Avery Rowe.

Tradescantia spathacea Bantam Group A.Rowe & M.Pell., Gp. nov.

Fig. 6D–H

Recognition

Habit much smaller than the wild forms; stems less than 10 mm wide, prostrate; leaves up to 15 × 3 cm; flowers rare, when present, same as the wild forms, except for the brown anther sacs and sterile pollen; fruits and seeds never observed.

Etymology

Named after the small varieties of domestic fowl (usually of chicken or duck), in reference to the reduced stature of the cultivars in this group. Just like the fowl varieties, members of the T. spathacea Bantam Group are much smaller than the standard-sized wild forms, but otherwise similar in most respects.

Origin

A group of cultivars of unknown origin, cultivated since at least 1984.

Notes

The Bantam Group currently comprises five accepted cultivars, differentiated based on leaf colouration and variegation patterns. The plants in this group flower very seldom, which is most likely due to their reduced vigour, especially the variegated cultivars (i.e. T. spathacea ‘Cream’, T. spathacea ‘HANSOTI02’, and T. spathacea ‘Sitara’). The T. spathacea Bantam Group is very popular in cultivation, generally grown as groundcover or in containers.

Tradescantia spathacea (Bantam Group) ‘Dwarf’ D.Arv. et al. (Arvidsson et al. 2011: 44)

Fig. 6D

Tradescantia spathacea ‘Nana’ Winn & Frieling (Winn and Frieling 1984: 17)

Tradescantia spathacea ‘Bermudensis’ Winn & Frieling (Winn and Frieling 1984: 17)

Recognition

Leaves adaxially green to olive-green, abaxially vinaceous to purple, margins purple when grown under bright light; flowers never observed.

Origin

Unknown.

Notes

As the name suggests, this cultivar represents a miniaturised form of wild-occurring T. spathacea. The earlier names are rejected because cultivars cannot be named using Latin words (Brickell et al. 2016, Art. 21.11).

Tradescantia spathacea (Bantam Group) ‘Cream’ A.Rowe (Rowe 2025: 1537)

Fig. 6E

Recognition

Stems cream-coloured or yellow or green or pink, commonly longitudinally striped in one of the other colours; leaves adaxially green to olive-green, with sectoral variegation consisting of cream-coloured to pink stripes, abaxially pinkish-purple to greyish-purple, with pale yellow to cream-coloured stripes mirroring the adaxial cream-coloured to pink stripes; flowers never observed.

Origin

Unknown, but cultivated in Europe since at least 2022.

Notes

The pattern of variegation is highly plastic, with different leaves ranging from almost entirely green to almost entirely cream-coloured to pink stripes, depending on the number and width of the stripes.

Tradescantia spathacea (Bantam Group) ‘HANSOTI02’ Hansoti (Hansoti 2007: 1)

Fig. 6F

Tradescantia spathacea ‘SITARA GOLD’ Hansoti (Hansoti 2010: 1)

Tradescantia spathacea ‘HANSOTI 02’ Hansoti (Hansoti 2011: 1)

Tradescantia spathacea ‘Golden Oyster’ L.C.Hatch (Hatch 2022: 10)

Recognition

Leaves adaxially dark green, longitudinally striped yellow to lime-green, sometimes so densely striped the leaves look greenish-grey, abaxially pale lavender to pink, margins golden; flowers rare.

Origin

Sport mutation discovered by Ashish Hansoti in Mumbai, India, in 2005.

Notes

The variegation pattern in the leaves is generally stable but occasionally makes solid-gold sports (i.e. T. spathacea ‘Lemon Sunset’). The colouration of the leaves can become more or less bold depending on lighting conditions. Unpublished trade names include ‘Sitake’s Gold’ (an orth. var. of ‘SITARA GOLD’), ‘Sunny Star’, and ‘Amber Waves’.

Tradescantia spathacea (Bantam Group) ‘Lemon Sunset’ A.Rowe, cv. nov.

Fig. 6G

Recognition

Leaves adaxially solid lime-green to golden-yellow, lacking stripes, abaxially pink to light pinkish-purple; flowers rare.

Origin

Sport mutation which has arisen independently from T. spathacea ‘HANSOTI02’ on multiple occasions.

Notes

Named by Tyleen Mansker after a community vote. In T. spathacea ‘Lemon Sunset’, the variegation characteristic of T. spathacea ‘HANSOTI02’ is lost, giving rise to this cultivar’s evenly coloured leaves.

Tradescantia spathacea (Bantam Group) ‘Sitara’ L.C.Hatch (Hatch 2022: 11)

Fig. 6H

Tradescantia spathacea ‘Tricolor’ R.Baldwin et al. (Baldwin et al. 2006: 44)

Tradescantia spathacea ‘Dwarf Variegated’ D.Arv. et al. (Arvidsson et al. 2011: 44)

Tradescantia spathacea ‘Hawaiian Dwarf’ Jinyu Zhāng (Zhāng 2014: 102)

Tradescantia spathacea ‘Compacta’ Jinyu Zhāng (Zhāng 2014: 102)

Tradescantia spathacea ‘Razzmatazz’ L.C.Hatch (Hatch 2022: 10)

Recognition

Leaves adaxially dark yellowish-green to olive-green to greyish-green, with purplish-grey to light purple to pale pink longitudinal stripes, abaxially pink to purple with longitudinal vinaceous stripes mirroring the adaxial stripes; flowers rare.

Origin

Sport mutation discovered by Ashish Hansoti in Mumbai, India, in 2002.

Notes

The breeder’s chosen name is given priority despite not being established until 2022 (Brickell et al. 2016, Art. 31.4). The pattern of variegation in this cultivar is stable and consistent. However, the stripes can become more or less bold depending on lighting conditions. Unpublished trade names include ‘Bermudensis Variegata’, ‘Pink Lightning’, ‘Purple Flame’, ‘Purple Rain’, ‘Rainbow’, ‘Tricolor Dwarf’, ‘Variegata’, and ‘Versicolor’.

Discussion

Tradescantia was deemed by Poole and Hunt (1980) as a stenopollinic group, with few species not fitting under their pollen Type 3 (i.e. T. zanonia, included in Type 4B and the only species in the family with zonosulcate grains) or presenting unique features (i.e. T. zebrina, the only species in the family to present tenuites). Nonetheless, we have shown in the present study that, despite superficial pollen morphological similarities among species of Tradescantia, there is a clear untapped palynotaxonomic and ultrastructural potential. Taxonomically, Tradescantia remains a complex, morphologically diverse genus in dire need of a comprehensive taxonomic revision. This current contribution represents a continuation of previous systematic (Pellegrini 2017) and revision efforts in the genus (Pellegrini 2018). Further studies in Tradescantia are underway (Pellegrini et al. in prep.), including taxonomic revisions of T. sect. Campelia, T. sect. Corinna, and T. sect. Cymbispatha, and taxonomic novelties and new species in T. subg. Mandonia, T. subg. Setcreasea, and T. subg. Tradescantia. The combination of alpha taxonomy with horticultural studies is done for the first time in Commelinaceae, bringing much-needed clarity to this horticulturally important group. Our future studies on T. subg. Campelia aim to shed further light on the cultivars in this group and highlight how much can be learned and gained by taxonomists and horticulturists working together towards a common goal.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff and curators of all the visited herbaria for their support; Philip K. Nelson and Jim Conrad for the gorgeous images of Tradescantia concolor; PalDat, Dr Heidemarie Hallbritter, Ralf Buchner, and Amra Brkic for the SEM images of the pollen of T. sect. Rhoeo; and Dr Cynthia F.P. Luz (Palino-IPA, SP) for the constructive pollen ultrasculpture feedback on an early version of this manuscript. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their contributions and suggestions to improve this manuscript. MOOP would like to thank CAPES for their past PhD scholarship and postdoctoral grant, Fundação Flora de Apoio à Botânica and the Smithsonian Institution for MOOP’s REFLORA grant, and the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, which allowed the development and completion of this study. MOOP would also like to thank the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits), School of Animal, Plant & Environmental Sciences (APES), and the C.E. Moss Herbarium (J) for their current postdoctoral scholarship and the institutional and infrastructural support that enabled the completion of this study. Finally, we would like to dedicate this article to our late co-author, Dr David R. Hunt, friend, mentor, collaborator, and one of the greatest specialists of Tradescantiinae. We hope to carry on your legacy and continue your exquisite work.

References

  • Arvidsson D, Bell C, Comben R, Couper E, Duncan E, English K, Fyfe S, Galloway K, Hughes N, Jago B, McFadden JP, Sandral C, Sydes T, Taylor R (2011) Grow Me Instead: a Guide for Gardeners in Queensland Wet Tropics. The Nursery & Garden Industry Queensland, Queensland. https://www.growmeinstead.com.au/public/GMI-brochure-Qld-Wet-Tropics.pdf [accessed 05.02.2026]
  • Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, de la Torre J, Scott B (2011) Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. ZooKeys 150: 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.150.2109
  • Baker JG (1868) Tab. 48. Commelynaceae, Tradescantia discolor Sm. var. concolor Baker. In: Saunders WW (Ed.) Refugium botanicum; or figures and descriptions from living specimens, of little known or new plants of botanical interest, vol. 1. J. van Voorst, London. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/60766936 [accessed 05.02.2026]
  • Burns JH, Faden RB, Steppan SJ (2011) Phylogenetic studies in the Commelinaceae subfamily Commelinoideae inferred from nuclear ribosomal and chloroplast DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 36(2): 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364411X569471
  • Butnariu M, Quispe C, Herrera-Bravo J, et al. (2022) A review on Tradescantia: phytochemical constituents, biological activities and health-promoting effects. Frontiers Bioscience, Landmark 27(6): 197. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2706197
  • Clarke CB (1881) Commelinaceae. In: de Candolle ALPP, de Candolle ACP (Eds) Monographiae Phanerogamarum, vol. 3. G. Masson, Paris, 113–324, t. I–VIII.
  • Cramer JC (1803) Dispositio Systematica Plantarum, Quae in Systemate Sexuali Linnaeano eas Classes et Ordines non Obtinent, in Quibus Secundum Numerum et Structuram Genitalium Reperiri Debent. Krieger, Marburg. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.7738
  • Evans TM, Sytsma KJ, Faden RB, Givnish TJ (2003) Phylogenetic relationships in the Commelinaceae: II. A cladistic analysis of rbcL sequences and morphology. Systematic Botany 28: 270–292. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3093996 [accessed 18.02.2026]
  • Faden RB (1991) The Morphology and Taxonomy of Aneilema R.Brown (Commelinaceae). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 76. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.123285
  • GBIF.org (2025) GBIF – Global Biodiversity Information Facility. https://www.gbif.org/ [accessed 28.07.2025]
  • Grant JR (2000) New Mesoamerican species of Dichorisandra and Tradescantia sect. Mandonia (Commelinaceae). Novon 10(2): 117–123. https://doi.org/10.2307/3393009
  • Grant JR (2004) Tradescantia boliviana (Commelinaceae), a new combination for an overlooked South American species. Novon 14(3): 299–301. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3393287 [accessed 05.02.2026]
  • Halbritter H, Ulrich S, Grímsson F, Weber M, Zetter R, Hesse M, Buchner R, Svojtka M, Frosch-Radivo A (2018) Illustrated Pollen Terminology. Second edition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71365-6
  • Hatch LC (2022) Commelinaceae: a Guide to Modern and Historic Cultivars. Cultivar.org Publications, Cary, 1–60.
  • Hertweck KL, Pires JC (2014) Systematics and evolution of inflorescence structure in the Tradescantia alliance (Commelinaceae). Systematic Botany 39(1): 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364414X677991
  • Hunt DR (1975) The reunion of Setcreasea and Separotheca with Tradescantia. In: American Commelinaceae: I. Kew Bulletin 30(3): 443–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/4103068
  • Hunt DR (1979) New species and a new combination in the Tradescantieae. In: American Commelinaceae: VII. Kew Bulletin 33(3): 403–406. https://doi.org/10.2307/4110137
  • Hunt DR (1981) Precursory notes on Commelinaceae for the Flora of Trinidad and Tobago. In: American Commelinaceae: X. Kew Bulletin 36(1): 195–197. https://doi.org/10.2307/4119017
  • Hunt DR (1983) The taxonomy of the tribe Tradescantieae (Commelinaceae). PhD Thesis, The University of Reading, UK.
  • Hunt DR (1986a) Campelia, Rhoeo and Zebrina united with Tradescantia. In: American Commelinaceae: XIII. Kew Bulletin 41(2): 401–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/4102948
  • Joseph SM, Nampy S (2012) Capsule and seed morphology of Commelina L. (Commelinaceae) in relation to taxonomy. International Journal of Botany 8(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijb.2012.1.12
  • L’Héritier de Brutelle CL (1789) Sertum Anglicum, seu Plantae Rariores quae in Hortis juxta Londinum, Imprimis in Horto Regio Kewensi Excoluntur, ab Anno 1786 ad Annuum 1787 Observatae, Fasc. 1. P.-F.Didot, Paris. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.11440
  • Pellegrini MOO (2015) Filogenia e revisão taxonômica de Tradescantia L. sect. Austrotradescantia D.R.Hunt (Commelinaceae). MSc thesis, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Pellegrini MOO (2017) Morphological phylogeny of Tradescantia L. (Commelinaceae) sheds light on a new infrageneric classification for the genus and novelties on the systematics of subtribe Tradescantiinae. PhytoKeys 89: 11–72. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.89.20388
  • Pellegrini MOO (2018) Wandering throughout South America: taxonomic revision of Tradescantia subg. Austrotradescantia (D.R.Hunt) M.Pell. (Commelinaceae). PhytoKeys 101: 1–97. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.104.28484
  • Pellegrini MOO, Forzza RC, Sakuragui CM (2015) A nomenclatural and taxonomic review of Tradescantia L. (Commelinaceae) species described in Vellozo’s Flora fluminensis with notes on Brazilian Tradescantia. Taxon 64(1): 151–155. https://doi.org/10.12705/641.3
  • Pellegrini MOO, Forzza RC, Sakuragui CM (2016) (Con)Fused bracts: the identity and application of Tradescantia cymbispatha C.B.Clarke (Commelinaceae) and a neglected new Tradescantia species from Bolivia. Systematic Botany 41(4): 950–958. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364416X694053
  • Poole MM, Hunt DR (1980) Pollen morphology and the taxonomy of the Commelinaceae: an exploratory survey. In: American Commelinaceae: VIII. Kew Bulletin 34(4): 639–660. https://doi.org/10.2307/4119061
  • Prajapati T, Shukla A, Modi N (2020) Tradescantia spathacea Sw.: a review of its pharmacological and ethnopharmacological properties. International Journal of Research Culture Society 4(5): 52–56.
  • Regel EA (1868) Supplementum ad Index Seminum Anni 1866, quae Hortus Botanicus Imperialis Petropolitanus pro Mutua Commutatione Offert. Accedunt Animadversiones Botanicae Nonnullae. Saint Petersburg. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/45787932 [accessed 05.02.2026]
  • Rinz S, Rinz J (1862) Verzeichniss der verschiedenen feinen Tafel- & Oeconomie-Obstsorten, Gehölze für Garten-Anlagen, Gewächshaus-Pflanzen. Deutsche Gartenbaubibliothek, Frankfurt. https://archive.org/details/RinzS1862 [accessed 05.02.2026]
  • Smith W (1873) Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. Spottiswoode & Co., London.
  • Spjut RW (1994) A Systematic Treatment of Fruit Types. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 70.The New York Botanical Garden, New York.
  • Stearn WT (1957) The Boat-Lily (Rhoeo spathacea). Baileya 5(4): 195–198.
  • Stehlé H (1970) Notes taxinomiques et écologiques sur des Monocotylédones nouvelles ou rares des Antilles françaises: Commelinaceae (37e Contribution). Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 117(1–2): 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00378941.1970.10838746
  • Swartz OP (1788) Nova Genera & Species Plantarum, seu, Prodromus Descriptionum Vegetabilium, Maximam Partem Incognitorum quæ sub Itinere in Indiam Occidentalem Annis 1783–87. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Uppsala, Turku. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.433
  • Thiers B (2025) Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Gardens’ Virtual Herbarium. https://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/ [accessed 28.07.2025]
  • Tradescantia.uk (2025) Tradescantia Hub – Information and resources about growing Tradescantia and other Commelinaceae. https://tradescantia.uk/ [accessed 28.07.2025]
  • Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, Gandhi KG, Gravendyck J, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Klopper RR, Knapp S, Kusber W-H, Li D-Z, May TW, Monro AM, Prado J, Price MJ, Smith GF, Zamora Señoret JC (2025) International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Madrid Code). Regnum Vegetabile 162. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226839479.001.0001
  • Verschaffelt A (1857) Catalogue de l’Établissement horticole de Ambroise Verschaffelt, Printemps et Éte 1857, No. 63. Imprimerie et Litographie de F. et E. Gyselynck, Gand. https://archive.org/details/VerschaffeltA63.1857 [accessed 13.02.2026]
  • Wade DJ, Evans TM, Faden RB (2006) Subtribal relationships in tribe Tradescantieae (Commelinaceae) based on molecular and morphological data. Aliso 22(1): 520–526. https://doi.org/10.5642/aliso.20062201.40
  • Weberling F (1989) Morphology of Flowers and Inflorescences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Winn TR, Frieling KW (1984) Glasshouse Works Rare & Traditional Plant Catalogue ‘84. Glasshouse Works, Stewart.
  • Zhāng J (2014) Catalogue of Indoor Ornamental Plants, Part 2 [in Chinese]. Morningstar Publishing, Taichung.
login to comment