Research Article
Print
Research Article
Palliocystidium, a new genus in the family Hydnodontaceae (Trechisporales)
expand article infoAlexander Ordynets, Gérald Gruhn§
‡ University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany
§ Office National des Forêts, Mende, France
Open Access

Abstract

Background and aims – During fieldwork in French Guiana in 2018, two fungal specimens resembling Subulicystidium oberwinkleri were collected. This study aims to clarify species- and genus-level assignment of this material and of S. oberwinkleri.

Material and methods – Corticioid fruiting bodies were examined under a light microscope, and spores from the spore prints were studied morphometrically. DNA sequences of large subunit-coding DNA and internal transcribed spacer were used for maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses. Furthermore, guanine-cytosine content was calculated for the LSU dataset, and UNITE Species Hypotheses Matching Analysis was performed for newly generated ITS sequences.

Key results – The new genus, Palliocystidium, is introduced in the family Hydnodontaceae, based on the peculiar pattern of cystidial encrustation (crystalline plates of various shapes) and cystidial septation and supported by results of phylogenetic analyses. Within the new genus, the new species P. chlamydatum from French Guiana is described. In addition, Subulicystidium oberwinkleri is transferred to Palliocystidium. The two species can be distinguished by the size of their reniform spores. Both species display high levels of guanine-cytosine content at the scale of the order Trechisporales.

Conclusions – In the newly introduced genus Palliocystidium and genera Subulicystidium and Luellia, there is significant potential for further exploration of species diversity and generic boundaries. Additional intensified fruiting-body-based sampling of taxa and genes is necessary to clarify the relationship of genera within Hydnodontaceae.

Keywords

Agaricomycetes, corticioid fungi, crystals, cystidia, DNA barcoding, generic relationship, reniform basidiospores

Introduction

The order Trechisporales K.H.Larss. is one of the early-diverging fungal lineages of the class Agaricomycetes Doweld, phylum Basidiomycota R.T.Moore. Taxonomic studies on Trechisporales not only shed light on global fungal diversity but also contribute to a better understanding of early events in the evolution of mushroom-forming fungi, including the evolution of fruiting body complexity and nutritional strategies. The fruiting bodies of the known representatives of Trechisporales display certain variation in shape and considerable variation in hymenophore configuration (Hibbett et al. 2014; de Meiras-Ottoni et al. 2021). Current knowledge of the nutrition strategies of Trechisporales indicates their basic saprotrophic ability along with an evolving ability to form ectomycorrhiza (Dunham et al. 2007; Rinaldi et al. 2008; Vanegas-León et al. 2019).

With increased attention to Trechisporales since its formal description (Hibbett et al. 2007), the view on the composition of families and genera in the order is rapidly changing. The assumed status of a separate family for the genus Sistotremastrum J.Erikss. and its sister genus Sertulicium Spirin, Volobuev & K.H.Larss. has been extensively debated and recently led to the segregation of the separate order Sistotremastrales L.W.Zhou & S.L.Liu (Larsson 2007; Spirin et al. 2021; Liu et al. 2022a, 2022b). The composition of genera within Trechisporales per se, now all treated within the family Hydnodontaceae Jülich, has been differently considered by different authors (He et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2019; Spirin et al. 2021). Currently, 12 genera are accepted as members of Hydnodontaceae, and for 11 of them, phylogenetic placement is molecularly supported (Liu et al. 2022a). However, the intergeneric relationship within Hydnodontaceae remains poorly understood.

Though not present in the largest genus Trechispora P. Karst., cystidia or cystidia-like hyphae are characteristic for many genera of Hydnodontaceae and often serve as a genus-level morphological marker (Oberwinkler 1965; Parmasto 1968; Liu et al. 2019). Among such genera, Subulicystidium Parmasto is currently one of the richest in terms of the number of known species. In the type of the genus, S. longisporum (Pat.) Parmasto, the most collected species in Europe, as well as most other known members of the genus, the smooth crystalline sheath of cystidia is covered with two chains of bow-tie-shaped crystals, which are seen in the light microscope as four chains of rectangular crystals along the cystidium body (Jülich 1975; Keller 1985). A few species deviate from this pattern by the shape, location, or frequency of individual crystals (e.g. Punugu et al. 1980) but were proven to belong to Subulicystidium based on analysis of nuclear ribosomal DNA (Ordynets et al. 2018, 2020).

On cystidia of one species of Subulicystidium, viz. S. oberwinkleri Ordynets, Riebesehl & K.H.Larss., regular chains of rectangular crystals are absent but instead plate-like to irregular oblong crystals present. Particularly, this species was placed at the most basal node and slightly apart from the rest of Subulicystidium species in nuclear ribosomal DNA-based phylogenetic trees (Ordynets et al. 2018). Another study even placed S. oberwinkleri outside of the otherwise well-supported Subulicystidium clade and thus questioned the generic affiliation of the species (Liu et al. 2019). The holotype of this species further stands out as one of the outliers among Agaricomycotina Doweld regarding guanine-cytosine (GC) content in the large subunit of the nuclear ribosomal DNA. This property of the specimen can bias the inference of its phylogenetic position (Kolařík et al. 2021).

During fieldwork in French Guiana in 2018, two fungal specimens (fruiting bodies) that resembled S. oberwinkleri were collected. Morphological and molecular investigations allowed us to consider this material as a new species in a separate genus within Hydnodontaceae. This paper describes the new species as the type of a new genus, and proposes a new generic position for S. oberwinkleri.

Material and methods

Morphological study

Macroscopic and microscopic studies were based on fresh and dried material. Sections were prepared with a razor blade and observed in several aqueous solutions: Congo Red in 10% ammonium, 3% potassium hydroxide with the addition of 1% phloxine B, Melzer’s reagent, and cotton blue. Measurements for two specimens from French Guiana were made from microphotographs under 1000× magnification, using the software Mycomètre (Fannechère 2020). Microphotographs for the rest of specimens were made with the built-in ICC 50 HD camera of Leica DM500 microscope, and spore measurements were done with the software “Makroaufmaßprogramm” (Rüdigs 2023) and processed with the software “Smaff” v.3.2 (Wilk 2012). The abbreviation Q stands for the spore length/spore width ratio. The number of measured spores is indicated in square brackets. Spore measurements for the specimens from French Guiana were based on spore prints, observed in Melzer’s reagent in side view with apiculus excluded (Duhem 2010). In the studied material, spores from dried herbarium specimens were measured in 3% aqueous solution of potassium hydroxide (KOH) mixed with 1% aqueous solution of phloxine B. Spores size of the new taxon and morphologically similar taxa were visually compared on scatterplot produced in R Statistical environment v.4.1.2 (R Core Team 2021) with package ggplot2 v.3.3.5 (Wickham 2016). Ellipses around the clouds of spores for each species were drawn assuming a multivariate normal distribution of measurements and a confidence level of 95%. The length of a spore is usually understood as the size of the straight line connecting the proximal and distal poles of the spore (Josserand 1983). This principle was generally followed in this study when working with spore traits of different species. However, in identification key, for S. curvisporum Gorjón, Gresl. & Rajchenb., spore length corresponded to the size of bent line representing spore’s long axis following the information from authors of the species (Gorjón et al. 2012).

Specimens are preserved in the Herbarium of the Faculty of Pharmacy of Lille, France (LIP), and their duplicates in the fungal collection at the Department of Ecology, University of Kassel, Germany (KAS). Some of the specimens are also deposited in the collection of the Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (FR). These acronyms and other mentioned collections follow Thiers (2024). The photo of the new species and the drawings for this study were prepared by G. Gruhn.

DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing

Sequences of two nuclear ribosomal DNA regions were considered in our study: ribosomal large subunit-coding DNA (nc 28S rDNA) and internal transcribed spacers (nc ITS rDNA). Total DNA was extracted from dry specimens employing a modified protocol based on Murray and Thompson (1980). PCR reactions (Mullis and Faloona 1987) included 35 cycles with an annealing temperature of 54°C. The primers ITS1F and ITS4 or ITS4B (White et al. 1990; Gardes and Bruns 1993) were employed to amplify the ITS rDNA region, while LR0R, LR1, and LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990; Cubeta et al. 1991; Van Tuinen et al. 1998) were used for the 28S rDNA region. PCR products were checked in 1% agarose gels, and amplicons were sequenced with one or both PCR primers. Raw sequences (chromatograms) were inspected to remove low-quality base calls or replace those with IUPAC ambiguity symbols when necessary with Geneious v.5.6.7 (Kearse et al. 2012).

In this study, one nc 28S rDNA and two nc ITS rDNA sequences were generated. They were submitted to GenBank (Benson et al. 2013) as accessions OQ555358, OQ555356, and OQ555357, respectively. We did not succeed in amplifying 28S rDNA for the second specimen from French Guiana. Additionally, two 28S and 18 ITS sequences of Trechisporales and Sistotremastrales from the UNITE database (Abarenkov et al. 2024) and 68 28S and 34 ITS sequences from GenBank were used in the phylogenetic analyses. Two sequences from the order Auriculariales Bromhead and two from Hymenochaetales Oberw. were included as an outgroup in analyses of the 28S data. For the analysis of the ITS data with a more detailed sampling around the new taxon and focussing on the cystidiate Hydnodontaceae, Dextrinocystis calamicola S.H.He & S.L.Liu was used as an outgroup. For the newly generated ITS sequences, UNITE Species Hypotheses Matching Analysis was applied to find possible close matches between fruiting body-based and environmental DNA data (Abarenkov et al. 2022). All sequences used in the study are listed with brief metadata in Table 1.

Table 1.

DNA sequences of Trechisporales and Sistotremastrales used in this study with information on voucher specimens and publication source. Abbreviation “NA” means sequence is not available or was not included in our analyses. Asterisk after the source refers to the linkage of DNA sequence and published paper that is evident for us but yet to be displayed in the public sequence database. Author names without publication year refer to creators of DNA sequence as indicated in the public/private sequence database. In this case, the name of the unpublished project is usually provided after „/“ symbol. Sequences generated by this study are in bold.

Species LSU ITS Specimen ID/Strain number Fungarium ID Linked publication or creators/unpublished project
Allotrechispora daweishanense MW293866 MW302337 CLZhao 17860 (holotype) SWFC Zong et al. (2021)
Allotrechispora gatesiae OM339206 OM523378 LWZ 20180515-18 (holotype) MEL Liu et al. (2022a)
Allotrechispora xantha MW293868 MW302339 CLZhao 2632 (holotype) SWFC Zong et al. (2021)
Auricularia sp. AY634277 DQ200918 PBM2295 (AFTOL-ID 676) Mathenyet al. 2007 (ITS); Matheny and Hibbett (28S) / AFTOL
Brevicellicium atlanticum HE963774 NR119820 9065IM (holotype) LISU 178566 Telleria et al. (2013)
Brevicellicium exile HE963778 HE963777 5217MD MA-Fungi 26554 Telleria et al. (2013)
Brevicellicium olivascens HE963793 HE963792 KHL 8571 GB Telleria et al. (2013)
Dextrinocystis calamicola NA MK204533 He 5693 BJFC Liu et al. (2019)
Dextrinocystis calamicola MK204547 MK204534 He 5700 BJFC Liu et al. (2019)
Exidiopsis calcea AF291326 AF291280 MW 331 TUB Weiß and Oberwinkler (2001)
Fibrodontia alba KC928275 KC928274 TNM F24944/ EYu110703-25 (holotype) TNM Yurchenko and Wu (2014)
Fibrodontia austrosinensis MT802111 MT802105 LWZ 20190820-11b (holotype) HMAS Liu et al. (2021)
Fibrodontia brevidens KC928277 KC928276 TNM F9008/ Wu 9807-16 TNM Yurchenko and Wu (2014)
Fibrodontia gossypina AY646100 DQ249274 AFTOL-ID 599 Matheny and Hibbett (28S), Matheny et al. (ITS) / AFTOL
Fibrodontia subalba MT802106 MT802100 Dai 15931 Liu et al. (2021)
Fibrodontia subaustrosinensis OM339223 OM523398 He 6279 (holotype) BJFC 033223 Liu et al. (2022a)
Kneiffiella floccosa DQ873618 DQ873618 Berglund 150-02 GB Larsson et al. (2006)
Litschauerella gladiola MK204556 MK204555 He 3171 BJFC Liu et al. (2019)
Luellia cystidiata MW371211 MW371211 JHP-09.455 Larsson and Larsson
Luellia recondita NA UDB07673559| NOCOR472-18 O-DFL-8281 O-F-253788 Marthinsen / Sweden, Vimmerby
Luellia recondita NA UDB038222| NOCOR306-18 SS1005 O-F-253622 Abarenkov / UNITE: Norwegian fungi from BOLD to UNITE
Luellia recondita NA UDB031122 TUF109650 Saar / UNITE: Nordic Mycological Congress 2015
Palliocystidium chlamydatum OQ555358 OQ555356 GG-GUY18-115 LIP This study
Palliocystidium chlamydatum NA OQ555357 GG-GUY18-371 LIP This study
Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri MH041561 NA KHL 11042 GB Ordynets et al. (2018)
Palliocystidium oberwinkleri MH041562 MH041511 L 1860 (isotype) KAS Ordynets et al. (2018)
Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri NA UDB07645280 TUE Tiirmann / UNITE: Tedersoo L et al. Global soil samples
Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri NA UDB07645281 TUE Tiirmann / UNITE: Tedersoo L et al. Global soil samples
Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri NA UDB07645282 TUE Tiirmann / UNITE: Tedersoo L et al. Global soil samples
Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri NA UDB07645283 TUE Tiirmann / UNITE: Tedersoo L et al. Global soil samples
Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri NA UDB07645284 TUE Tiirmann / UNITE: Tedersoo L et al. Global soil samples
Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri NA UDB07645285 TUE Tiirmann / UNITE: Tedersoo L et al. Global soil samples
Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri NA UDB07645286 TUE Tiirmann / UNITE: Tedersoo L et al. Global soil samples
Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri NA UDB07645287 TUE Tiirmann / UNITE: Tedersoo L et al. Global soil samples
Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri NA UDB07645288 TUE Tiirmann / UNITE: Tedersoo L et al. Global soil samples
Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri NA UDB07645289 TUE Tiirmann / UNITE: Tedersoo L et al. Global soil samples
Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri NA UDB07645290 TUE Tiirmann / UNITE: Tedersoo L et al. Global soil samples
Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri NA UDB07645291 TUE Tiirmann / UNITE: Tedersoo L et al. Global soil samples
Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri NA UDB07645292 TUE Tiirmann / UNITE: Tedersoo L et al. Global soil samples
Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri NA UDB07645293 TUE Tiirmann / UNITE: Tedersoo L et al. Global soil samples
Porpomyces abiens MN987945 MN987945 Vlasák 1808/16 H 7009714 Spirin et al. (2021)
Porpomyces mucidus KT157838 KT157833 Dai 12692 BJFC Wu and Zhao (2015)
Porpomyces submucidus KT152145 KU509521 Cui 5183 BJFC Wu and Zhao (2015); Zhao (ITS)
Pteridomyces galzinii MN937559 MN937559 Bernicchia 8122 GB Spirin et al. (2021)*
Pteridomyces galzinii LR694188 LR694210 GB0150230 Ryberg M., direct submission
Sertulicium granuliferum MK204552 MK204540 He 3338 Liu et al. (2019)
Sertulicium jacksonii MN987943 MN987943 Spirin 10425 H Spirin et al. (2021)
Sertulicium limonadense MT180978 MT180981 LIP 0001683 (holotype) LIP 0001683 Gruhn and Alvarado (2021)*
Sertulicium niveocremeum MN937563 MN937563 KHL 13727 GB Spirin et al. (2021)
Sertulicium vernale MT664174 MT002311 Soderholm 3886 (holotype) H Spirin et al. (2021)
Sistotremastrum aculeatum MW045423 MN991176 Miettinen 10380.1 H Spirin et al. (2021)*
Sistotremastrum aculeocrepitans MN937564 MN937564 KHL 16097 URM Spirin et al. (2021)
Sistotremastrum confusum MN937567 MN937567 KHL 16004 URM Spirin et al. (2021)*
Sistotremastrum denticulatum MW045424 MN954694 Motato-Vásquez 894 (holotype) SP Spirin et al. (2021)
Sistotremastrum fibrillosum NG075239 NR161047 GG GUY12-180 (holotype) LIP 0001413 Gruhn et al. (2018)
Sistotremastrum geminum MN991177 MN991177 Miettinen 14333 (holotype) MAN Spirin et al. (2021)*
Sistotremastrum induratum MT664173 MT002324 Spirin 8598 (holotype) H Spirin et al. (2021)
Sistotremastrum mendax MN937570 MN937570 KHL 12022 (holotype) GB Spirin et al. (2021)*
Sistotremastrum rigidum MW045435 MN954693 Motato-Vásquez 833 (holotype) SP Spirin et al. (2021)
Sistotremastrum suecicum MN937571 MN937571 KHL 11849 GB Spirin et al. (2021)*
Sistotremastrum vigilans MN937572 MN937572 Fonneland 2011-78 (holotype) O Spirin et al. (2021)*
Subulicystidium acerosum MK204543 MK204539 He 3804 (holotype) BJFC 022303 Liu et al. (2019)
Subulicystidium boidinii NA MH041527 L 1584a (isotype) KAS Ordynets et al. (2018)
Subulicystidium brachysporum MH000599 MH000599 KHL 16100 O Ordynets et al. (2018)
Subulicystidium cochleum MN207024 MN207036 KHL 11200 GB Ordynets et al. (2020)
Subulicystidium daii OM339224 OM523399 LWZ 20170820-35 (holotype) HMAS Liu et al. (2022a)
Subulicystidium grandisporum MH041592 MH041547 LR 29162 (holotype) O:F 506781 Ordynets et al. (2018)
Subulicystidium harpagum MH041588 MH041532 L 1726a (isotype) KAS Ordynets et al. (2018)
Subulicystidium inornatum MH041569 MH041558 KHL 10444 (holotype) GB Ordynets et al. (2018)
Subulicystidium longisporum MH000601 MH000601 KHL 14229 GB Ordynets et al. (2018)
Subulicystidium meridense MH041604 MH041538 Hjm 16400 GB Ordynets et al. (2018)
Subulicystidium nikau MH041565 MH041513 L 1296 KAS Ordynets et al. (2018)
Subulicystidium obtusisporum MH041566 MH041521 Piepenbrink & Lotz-Winter W213-3-I FR Ordynets et al. (2018)
Subulicystidium parvisporum MH041590 MH041529 L 0140 (holotype) FR Ordynets et al. (2018)
Subulicystidium perlongisporum MN207030 MN207054 LY 11631 (holotype) LY 11631 Ordynets et al. (2020)
Subulicystidium rarocrystallinum MH041564 MH041512 LR 15483 (holotype) O:F 918488 Ordynets et al. (2018)
Subulicystidium robustius MH041608 MH041514 KHL 10813 GB Ordynets et al. (2018)
Subulicystidium tedersooi NA UDB014161 TU 110894 (holotype) TU Ordynets et al. (2018)
Subulicystidium tropicum MK204542 MK204530 He 3583 (holotype) BJFC 022470 Liu et al. (2019)
Suillosporium cystidiatum MN937573 MN937573 Spirin 3830 H Spirin et al. (2021)*
Trechispora cyatheae NA UDB024015 FR-0219442 FR Ordynets et al. (2015)
Trechispora echinocristallina UDB024019 UDB024018 FR-0219445 (holotype) FR Ordynets et al. (2015)
Trechispora farinacea AF347089 AF347089 KHL 8793 GB Larsson et al. (2004)
Trechispora havencampii NG059993 NR154418 DED 8300 (holotype) SFSU Desjardin and Perry (2015)
Trechispora hymenocystis AF347090 AF347090 KHL 8795 GB Larsson et al. (2004)
Trechispora nivea AY586720 KU747096 GB0102694 Larsson et al. (2004); Telleria et al. (ITS)
Trechispora regularis AF347087 AF347087 KHL 10881 GB Larsson et al. (2004)
Tubulicium bambusicola MK204551 MK204536 He 4776 BJFC Liu et al. (2019)
Tubulicium bambusicola NA MK204535 He 4058 (holotype) BJFC 023499 Liu et al. (2019)
Tubulicium curvisporum LC336428 NA TUMH 63048 Ushijima et al. (2019)
Tubulicium raphidisporum MK204545 MK204537 He 3191 BJFC Liu et al. (2019)
Tubulicium raphidisporum NA MK204538 He 2851 BJFC Liu et al. (2019)
Tubulicium vermiculare AJ406424 NA GEL 5015 KAS Langer (2002)
Tubulicium vermiferum AY463477 NA KHL 8714 GB Larsson et al. (2004)
Tubulicium vermiferum NA MZ159524 K(M):194604 Gaya et al. / Barcoding fungi from Royal Botanic Garden Kew Fungarium
Tubulicium vermiferum NA LC213625 TUFC 14505 S. Ushijima and N. Maekawa, direct submission

Phylogenetic analyses

General remarks

If not otherwise specified, analyses were conducted within or launched from R Statistical environment v.4.1.2 (R Core Team 2021) on Windows 11 (build 22621). Edited DNA sequences (fasta format) were imported in R with the package ape v.5.5 (Paradis and Schliep 2019). Multiple sequence alignments were performed with the program MAFFT v.7.490 (Katoh and Standley 2013) with the settings “auto” for selecting the alignment method, two cycles of iterative refinement, and a default gap opening penalty of 1.53 at group-to-group alignment. Removal of poorly aligned position from the multiple sequence alignment was performed with gblocks v.0.91b (Castresana 2000) with the following settings: minimum proportion of sequences for a conserved position (b1) and minimum number of sequences for a flank position (b2) set to 0.6, the maximum number of contiguous nonconserved positions equal to the number of alignment positions, minimum length of a block equal to 2, and treatment of gap positions set to “h”, i.e. treating as gap positions only those where 50% or more of the sequences have a gap. The programs MAFFT and gblocks were launched with the functions of the package ips v.0.0.11 (Heibl et al. 2019). Phylogenetic analyses were applied to unpartitioned nc 28S and partitioned nc ITS rDNA datasets separately as described below.

The packages ggtree v.3.2.1 (Yu et al. 2017; Yu 2020) and ggplot2 v.3.3.5 (Wickham 2016) were used for plotting the phylogenetic results. General data management in R was supplied by the packages conflicted v.1.0.4 (Wickham and RStudio 2021), dplyr v.1.0.7 (Wickham et al. 2022c), forcats v.0.5.1 (Wickham and RStudio 2022), here v.1.0.1 (Müller and Bryan 2020), purrr v.0.3.4 (Wickham et al. 2022a), readr v.2.1.0 (Wickham et al. 2022d), stringr v.1.4.0 (Wickham et al. 2022e), tibble v.3.1.6 (Müller et al. 2022), tidyr v.1.1.4 (Wickham et al. 2022b), tidyverse v.1.3.1 (Wickham et al. 2019), and report v.0.5.1 (Makowski et al. 2023). Adobe Illustrator 2025 (Adobe System, San Jose, CA, USA) was used for the final graphic refinement of the phylogenetic trees.

R code, input data, and results of analyses organized as R project are accessible as a published collection on Zenodo (Ordynets and Gruhn 2024).

28S dataset

After masking, the alignment length of the 28S data was 868 positions out of which 246 were parsimony-informative. To identify DNA sequences with abnormality in terms of GC content, we calculated proportions of G and C bases per sequence in the 321 bases long fragment of the masked 28S alignment that approximately corresponded to the fragment of D1 domain used for the same purpose in Kolařík et al. (2021), dataset “LSU Agaricomycotina”. We estimated the nucleotide substitution model for the unpartitioned alignment with ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) integrated on the IQ-TREE web server (Trifinopoulos et al. 2016), available at http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at. The best-scoring model choice was based on the Bayesian information criterion (Schwarz 1978) and was specified in IQ-TREE language as TN{3.7171,10.9071}+F+I{0.5066}+G4{0.7042}. BIONJ was used as a starting tree and a NNI strategy was applied while searching for the best-scoring maximum likelihood tree with IQ-TREE v.1.6.12 on the web server (Nguyen et al. 2015; Chernomor et al. 2016). Two computationally efficient types of node support values were calculated as suggested by the IQ-TREE developers: those based on a SH-aLRT test (Guindon et al. 2010) and on ultrafast bootstrap UFBoot2 (Hoang et al. 2018). Values ≥80% and ≥95%, respectively, indicate highly supported clades. Both tests were based on 1000 iterations.

The model parameters identified for the 28S data in IQ-TREE (stationary frequencies of the nucleotides, nucleotide substitution rates, the proportion of invariable sites, and the shape parameter of the gamma distribution of rate variation) were adopted as fixed priors for a Bayesian analysis in MrBayes v.3.2.7 (Ronquist et al. 2012). Eight million trees were generated in two independent MCMC runs, each with 4 chains, with a sampling frequency of 1/5000 and the burnin fraction set to 0.2. From the sampled trees (n = 2562), a majority-rule consensus tree was computed with branch supports representing the relative frequencies of bipartitions (posterior probabilities, pp). The analysis was finished with an average standard deviation of split frequencies of 0.011353 and was characterized by a potential scale reduction factor for branch and node parameters between 0.996 and 1.010 (average 1.000). The pooled effective sample size for the log-likelihood parameter equalled 2695.4 showing sufficient sampling effort (Ronquist et al. 2020). The stationarity and convergence of the sampled parameters were also checked with Tracer v.1.7.2 (Rambaut et al. 2018).

ITS dataset

The heterogeneity of the ITS region necessitated a more elaborate procedure. We split ITS into the ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2 subregions after running ITSx software (Bengtsson-Palme et al. 2013) implemented in the PlutoF workbench (Abarenkov et al. 2010). We concatenated the three subregions again after passing them through Gblocks with the same settings as used for the 28S dataset. The resulting alignment length was 456 positions out of which 279 were parsimony-informative. The best-scoring nucleotide substitution models were identified as:

TN{1.20444,3.21437}+F{0.196938,0.326837,0.288015,0.188211}+G4{1.00143} for ITS1, K2P{6.01492}+FQ+I{0.857252} for 5.8S, and TPM2u{1.87393,2.80335}+F{0.122292,0.307058,0.328059,0.242592}+G4{0.683562} for ITS2.

These specifications were used for the maximum likelihood tree search under the edge-linked partition model.

Model parameters identified for the three subregions of ITS in IQ-TREE were adopted as fixed priors for the Bayesian analysis in MrBayes and used as unlinked across partitions. Four million trees were generated in two independent MCMC runs, each with 4 chains, with a sampling frequency of 1/2000 and the burnin fraction set to 0.2. Analysis was finished with an average standard deviation of split frequencies of 0.006233 and was characterized by a potential scale reduction factor for branch and node parameters between 0.997 and 1.002 (average 1.000). The number of sampled trees in the two MCMC runs equalled 3202, and the pooled effective sample size for the likelihood parameter equalled 2824.8.

Taxonomic treatment

Taxonomic novelties

Palliocystidium Ordynets & G.Gruhn, gen. nov.

MycoBank No: 848230
Fig. 1A

Type species

Palliocystidium chlamydatum.

Figure 1. 

Microphotographs comparing cystidial encrustation in the newly described genus Palliocystidium (A, based on specimen P. cf. oberwinkleri KAS [L 1860]) versus the classical pattern known for Subulicystidium (B, based on specimen S. nikau KAS [L 1296]).

Diagnosis

Differs from the genus Subulicystidium by cystidial encrustation pattern: regular chains of rectangular crystals absent but plate-like to irregular oblong crystals present.

Etymology

Pallium (Latin, noun) – cloak, and cyst- (new Latin) + -idium. Referring to flat oblong crystals covering cystidium, resembling the way the cloak covered the body of the ancient Roman.

Notes

In both species currently recognised as Palliocystidium, clamped septa on the cystidia were found. These septa are especially easily observed on cystidia nearly devoid of crystals, i.e. due to young age. On the contrary, the crystalline coat of older cystidia hinders the observation of septa and clamps.

Palliocystidium chlamydatum G.Gruhn & Ordynets, gen. et sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 848236
Figs 2, 3, 4

Type

FRANCE – French Guiana • Regina, integral reserve of Les Nouragues, Saut Pararé, path of the Nourague creek; 4°07’30”S, 52°72’60”W; on unknown deciduous tree (fallen corticated branch); 12 Jan. 2018; A. Ballester & G. Gruhn leg.; holotype: LIP [GG-GUY18-115]. GenBank ITS = OQ555356, LSU = OQ555358.

Figure 2. 

Fresh fruiting body of the holotype of P. chlamydatum (holotype LIP [GG-GUY18-115]) photographed in the field. The apparent irregularities of the hymenium are due to the relief of the wood surface.

Diagnosis

Differs from Palliocystidium oberwinkleri by the smaller basidiospores.

Figure 3. 

Key elements of the fruiting body of P. chlamydatum, observed in the holotype (LIP [GG-GUY18-115]): basidia (top drawing, scale bar = bar 10 µm), and cystidia with underlying hyphae and some young basidia (bottom drawing, scale bar = 20 µm).

Description

Basidiocarps annual, resupinate, continuous, membranous, 8 × 2 cm, 20–40 µm thick, soft. Hymenial surface greyish, whitish when dry, smooth, porulose, velutinate under the binocular ×50. Margin adnate, indistinct, concolorous with hymenial surface. Smell indiscernible. Hyphal structure monomitic, tiny rounded clamps always present; subicular hyphae loosely interwoven, slightly brownish, with thickened walls, 3–5 µm in diam.; subhymenial hyphae thin- or only slightly thick-walled, rather loosely arranged and well visible, short cells (distances between neighbouring septa 8–12 µm), sometimes triangular when forked, 3.5–5 µm in diam. Cystidia numerous, hyphoid, thinning out with a rounded apex, single or bi-rooted, arising from hymenium layer, erected, 1–4 septate, basally thick-walled, thin-walled at the apex, at first smooth, then encrusted with oblong and irregular crystals of unknown matter, sometimes with septum and clamp, not reacting with Melzer’s, not cyanophilous, 54–64(75) × 5 µm, 3 µm in diam. at the apex. Basidia clavate, with a median constriction, 15–18 × 6.5–7 μm, tetrasporic. Basidiospores hyaline, thin-walled, reniform, with flattened to slightly curved adaxial side, mostly uniguttulated, [47](5.6)6.0–7.3(7.7) × (3.3)3.7–4.3(4.4) µm, Q 1.6–1.9, not amyloid, not dextrinoid, not cyanophilous.

Figure 4. 

Spores of the holotype of P. chlamydatum (LIP [GG-GUY18-115]), measured and drawn from the spore print. Scale bar = 10 µm.

Distribution

France (French Guiana), hitherto only known from two collections.

Habitat and ecology

Growing on dead, fallen branches of various deciduous trees in humid tropical forests of the neotropics.

Etymology

Chlamydatum (Latin, adj.) – dressed in chlamys, an ancient Greek cloak largely covering a human’s upper body and barely the lower body. Referring to the partial covering of the cystidium by the crystalline sheath.

Additional material examined

FRANCE – French Guiana • Regina, integral reserve of Les Nouragues, Saut Pararé, around the scientific station; A. Ballester & G. Gruhn leg.; paratype LIP [GG-GUY18-371] dupl. KAS. GenBank ITS = OQ555357.

Notes

The plate-like to irregular oblong crystals on cystidia and shorter basidiospores distinguish the species from Subulicystidium nikau (G.Cunn.) Jülich (Fig. 1B). Several descriptions or iconography are available for the latter species (Cunningham 1963; Jülich 1968; Ordynets et al. 2018).

Palliocystidium oberwinkleri (Ordynets, Riebesehl & K.H.Larss.) Ordynets & G.Gruhn, comb. nov.

MycoBank No: 848231
Fig. 1A

Subulicystidium oberwinkleri Ordynets, Riebesehl & K.H.Larss. in Ordynets, Scherf, Pansegrau, Denecke, Lysenko, Larsson & Langer, MycoKeys 35: 56. 2018 (Ordynets et al. 2018)

Type

FRANCE – La Réunion • Saint-Pierre: Saint-Philippe, Forêt de Mare Longue; 495 m; 21°20’37.68”S, 55°44’27.6”E [coordinates originally provided in decimal form -21.3438, 55.7410]; on dead woody branch; 28 Mar. 2015; J. Riebesehl leg.; holotype: FR; isotype: KAS [L 1860].

Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri

Material studied

VENEZUELA – Estado Aragua • Maracay, National Park Henri Pittier, Rancho Grande; 10°22’48”N, 67°37’08.4”W, on dead wood; 30 Aug. 1999; K.-H. Larsson leg.; GB [KHL 11042]. – Estado Merida • La Carbonera, Road Merida-La Azulita; 2000–2200 m; on dead wood; 19 Jan. 1969; F. Oberwinkler leg.; TUB [FO 14338].

Additional studied species

Subulicystidium nikau (G.Cunn.) Jülich

Fig. 1B

Type

NEW ZEALAND – Auckland • Cascades, Waitakere Ranges, on dead leaf midribs of palm Rhopalostylis sapida; 3 Apr. 1954; S.D. Baker leg.; holotype: PDD [PDD 13816].

Additional material examined

FRANCE – La Réunion • Saint-Pierre, Saint-Philippe, Sentier de Takamaka; ca 840 m; 21°5’28.7”S, 55°37’11.6”E; on dead wood; 26 Mar. 2015; J. Riebesehl & M. Schroth leg.; KAS, FR [L 1296].

Results

Phylogenetic analyses

28S data

Both maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian analysis (BA) of the 28S data recovered Sistotremastrales (SH-aLRT/UFBoot2 = 96.8%/100%; pp = 1) and Trechisporales (98.6/99; 1) as monophyletic orders (Figs 5, 6). Both analyses failed in resolving intergeneric relationship within the Trechisporales (here, equivalent to the family Hydnodontaceae). All non-singleton genera were recovered as monophyletic and highly supported within the latter order and family, with the exception of Brevicellicium K.H.Larss. & Hjortstam (85.1/93; 0.9) and Subulicystidium. In ML, Subulicystidium was intermixed with Pteridomyces galzinii (Bres.) Jülich and Porpomyces Jülich. In BA, DNA sequences of Subulicystidium were placed in polytomy together with all other genera of Hydnodontaceae (pp = 1). Both ML and BA placed Palliocystidium chlamydatum (OQ555358) in a well-supported clade, also containing Palliocystidium oberwinkleri MH041562 (isotype, La Réunion) and Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri MH041561 (Venezuela) (98.3/100; 1). Of the more than 444 positions available for all three accessions of Palliocystidium, there were six mismatches (1.35% distance) between the ex-holotype sequences of P. chlamydatum and P. oberwinkleri. Accession MH041561 was identical to the ex-holotype sequence of P. chlamydatum, though containing 9 IUPAC ambiguity symbols.

Figure 5. 

Phylogenetic relationship of Trechisporales and Sistotremastrales based on Maximum Likelihood analysis of 28S nc rDNA sequences. Best-scoring tree with SH-aLRT/UFBoot2 support values above the branches is shown. Tips of the tree are annotated according to the generic affiliation of the taxa. Two members of the order Auriculariales (Exidiopsis calcea and Auricularia sp.) and two of Hymenochaetales (Litschauerella gladiola and Kneiffiella floccosa) were used as an outgroup and were marked up with a single colour for the sake of simplicity.

Figure 6. 

Phylogenetic relationship of Trechisporales and Sistotremastrales based on Bayesian analysis of 28S nc rDNA sequences. Fifty-percent majority-rule consensus tree with posterior probabilities above the branches is shown. Tips of the tree are annotated according to the generic affiliation of the taxa. Two members of the order Auriculariales (Exidiopsis calcea and Auricularia sp.) and two of Hymenochaetales (Litschauerella gladiola and Kneiffiella floccosa) were used as an outgroup and were marked up with a single colour for the sake of simplicity.

The ex-holotype DNA sequence of P. oberwinkleri was characterized by the highest GC content in our 28S dataset (0.5452; median = 0.5140), while the accession of P. cf. oberwinkleri had a more balanced GC content (0.5171, Suppl. material 1). The ex-holotype DNA sequence of P. chlamydatum was the 5th richest in GC content (0.5327), preceded by sequences of Porpomyces submucidus F.Wu & C.L.Zhao, accession KT152145 (0.5421), Trechispora havencampii (Desjardin & B.A.Perry) Meiras-Ottoni & Gibertoni NG_059993, and T. echinocristallina Ordynets, Langer & K.H.Larss. UDB024019 (0.5389 for two latter).

ITS data

The resulting trees from the ML and BA analyses of the ITS data showed highly similar topologies. The ML tree will be used below for illustrating the results (Fig. 7), while the BA tree can be found in Suppl. material 2. The two sequences of P. chlamydatum formed a well-supported monophyletic clade (100/100; 1). Joined by Subulicystidium, the clade was not supported (41.7/71; 0.6). Subulicystidium gained sufficient support only after excluding S. nikau (86.4/95; 0.99). Among non-singleton taxa of the dataset, as monophyletic with highest support were recovered the genera Fibrodontia Parmasto (100/100; 1) and Tubulicium Oberw. (99.8/100; 1). Luellia recondita (H.S.Jacks.) K.H.Larss. & Hjortstam and L. cystidiata Hauerslev were arranged paraphyletically. The latter, instead, appeared as a sister species to the clade containing ex-holotype sequence of P. oberwinkleri MH041511 (98.1/99; 1). The clade with high support from two of the three analyses (98.4/93; 1) also included 14 UNITE accessions from high-throughput sequencing of soil samples from Madagascar. This clade corresponded to species hypothesis SH0892108.09FU (Kõljalg et al. 2023a). Two ITS sequences of P. chlamydatum represent a new species hypothesis that can be added to the UNITE sequence cluster UCL10_026981 but they have no close match with currently published DNA sequences. The similarity to the closest species hypothesis, SH1260357.09FU S. longisporum, amounts to nearly 84% (Kõljalg et al. 2023b).

Figure 7. 

Phylogenetic relationship of cystidiate taxa of Hydnodontaceae based on Maximum likelihood analysis of ITS nc rDNA sequences. Best-scoring tree with SH-aLRT/UFBoot2 support values above the branches is shown. Tips of the tree are annotated according to the generic affiliation of the taxa. Dextrinocystis calamicola was treated as an outgroup. In the clade sister to Luellia cystidiata, no species labels were assigned to the soil-derived DNA sequences because the species and genus identity of the single accession derived from the fruiting body, MH041511, is questioned in this study.

Morphological analyses

Visual comparison of basidiospore length and width for the species of Palliocystidium and Subulicystidium with reniform spores showed the strong separation of P. chlamydatum from P. oberwinkleri (Fig. 8). The spore width of P. chlamydatum and S. nikau essentially overlapped. However, the threshold of spore length of 7 µm allowed sufficient differentiation of two species. The majority of the spores of P. chlamydatum were 6–7 µm long, while those of S. nikau were 7–8 µm long.

Figure 8. 

Scatterplot of spore sizes at specimen and species levels in studied specimens of Palliocystidium and Subulicystidium with reniform spores. Ellipses around the species assume a multivariate normal distribution and confidence level of 95%. To avoid the higher complexity of the plot, specimens FO 14338 and KHL 11042, re-identified in this study as Palliocystidium cf. oberwinkleri were treated without the uncertainty sign “cf.”.

Identification key

Global morphological key to species of Subulicystidium and Palliocystidium

1 Basidiospores acicular, Q > 4.5 2
Basidiospores fusiform, cylindric, allantoid or reniform, Q < 4.5 8
2 Basidiospores with Q between 4.5 and 7 3
Basidiospores with Q > 7 5
3 Basidiospores on average shorter than 15.5 µm 4
Basidiospores on average longer, 15.5–17.5 × 2.3–3 μm S. daii
4 Basidiospores 12–16 × 2–3 μm S. longisporum
Basidiospores 11–12.5 × 1.8–2.2 μm S. tropicum
5 Basidiospores spirally curved, 27–35 μm long S. curvisporum
Basidiospores straight or only slightly curved, shorter 6
6 Cystidia with regular ornamentation (rows of rectangular crystals) S. perlongisporum
Cystidial crystalline sheath ends with a bundle of needle-like crystals 7
7 Basidiospores 20–27 × 2–3 μm S. cochleum
Basidiospores 15.5–18 × 1.8–2.2 μm S. acerosum
8 Basidiospores fusiform 9
Basidiospores cylindric, allantoid or reniform 14
9 Basidiospores 4–5 μm wide S. naviculatum
Basidiospores narrower 10
10 Cystidia almost smooth, without regular rectangular crystalline protrusions S. inornatum
Cystidia with regular ornamentation (rows of rectangular crystals) 11
11 Basidiospores broader than 3.5 μm S. ryvardenii
Basidiospores 2.5–3.5 μm wide 12
12 Individual crystals on cystidia 2.5–4 μm long S. robustius
Individual crystals on cystidia smaller, less than 2.5 μm long 13
13 Basidiospores 8.5–11.5 × 2–2.5 μm S. tedersooi
Basidiospores 10.5–12.5 × 2.5–3.5 μm S. fusisporum
14 Basidiospores reniform, Q between 1.5 and 2.5 15
Basidiospores cylindric or allantoid, Q between 2.5 and 4.5 17
15 Cystidia with regular ornamentation (rows of rectangular crystals) 16
Cystidia covered with irregularly shaped large crystalline plates 24
16 Basidiospores 7–9 × 3.5–4.5 μm S. nikau
Basidiospores 6–8 × 2.8–3.5 μm S. boidinii
17 Basidiospores 3–4 μm wide 18
Basidiospores 2–3 μm wide 20
18 Basidiospores 10–15 μm long S. grandisporum
Basidiospores shorter 19
19 Basidiospores 9–13 μm long, cystidia with regular rows of rectangular crystals S. obtusisporum
Basidiospores 8–10.5 μm long, cystidia bear rectangular to rounded, rather sparse and irregularly arranged crystals S. rarocrystallinum
20 Basidiospores 5.0–6.2 μm long S. parvisporum
Basidiospores longer 21
21 Basidiospores 7–10.5 μm long S. brachysporum sensu Boidin and Gilles (1988)
Basidiospores 6–8 μm long 22
22 Crystal protrusions on cystidia are short rods that project backwards under acute angle, giving cystidia the resemblance of a harpoon S. harpagum
Cystidia with regular ornamentation (rows of rectangular crystals) 23
23 Basidiospores with attenuated base S. brachysporum sensu Talbot (1958)
Basidiospores with obtuse base S. meridense
24 Cystidia > 80 µm long, basidiospores 8–11 × 4.0–5.5 μm P. oberwinkleri
Cystidia < 75 µm long, basidiospores 6–7.5 × 3.7–4.3 μm P. chlamydatum

Discussion

This study introduces the new corticioid fungal genus Palliocystidium based on peculiar cystidium morphology, UNITE species hypotheses matching, and phylogenetic analyses. Within the new genus, we describe the new species P. chlamydatum. We also transfer Subulicystidium oberwinkleri to the new genus.

Being covered by crystalline plates of various shapes and bearing septa, Palliocystidium demonstrates a novel cystidium type in the family Hydnodontaceae. This encrustation pattern deviates from the classical one in the better-known genus Subulicystidium (regular rows of rectangular crystals). Ordynets et al. (2020) commented on P. oberwinkleri (as Subulicystidium) in the context of phylogeny of Subulicystidium that “… a peculiar cystidium encrustation (crystal plates) correlates with an isolated phylogenetic position”. We argue that the species treated here as P. oberwinkleri was known to the mycological community much earlier than from the point of its formal naming in 2018. Peculiar cystidia of this species were illustrated and discussed already by Oberwinkler (1977) and later Boidin and Gilles (1988), and then Maekawa (1998). However, neither of the three studies was prepared to assign their specimens to a separate species and instead labelled them as S. nikau. This solution cannot be justified as the holotype of S. nikau has cystidia with a typical regular Subulicystidium encrustation (Cunningham 1955; Ordynets et al. 2018). The specimens mentioned in all of the above cited studies, except Maekawa (1998), were examined by Ordynets et al. (2018) and the results of the measurements were re-used in morphological analysis of the present study.

The two species that we consider within the genus Palliocystidium share the character of reniform spores but they can be easily distinguished based on the difference in the size of the latter. The separation of P. chlamydatum from S. nikau based solely on spores is more challenging and needs careful measurement of spore length. There is also a difference in the average spore width between the holotype of S. nikau collected on nikau palm (Rhopalostylis sapida H.Wendl. & Drude) in New Zealand (PDD 13816) and the specimen labelled as S. nikau but collected on dead wood on La Réunion (KAS: L1296). Molecular data are available only for Reunionese material, while DNA amplification from the holotype of S. nikau did not succeed (Ordynets et al. 2018). It cannot be excluded that the material from New Zealand and La Réunion represents two different species, and additional fresh fungal specimens and DNA sequences are necessary to explore this hypothesis.

In our study, only for specimens of P. chlamydatum spore measurements are based on spore prints and performed in Melzer’s reagent. For other collections, they are based on sections from fruiting bodies (i.e. potentially containing immature spores) and mounted in potassium hydroxide (potentially causing some swelling in microscopic structures). Therefore, morphometric comparison presented in this study should be treated with caution. Although spores of Basidiomycota do not change in size as dramatically as in some Ascomycota depending on vitality and mounting medium, we admit that future measurements should ideally be based entirely on spore prints and performed in media not potentially causing size or shape change of the spores. The measuring protocol should be comprehensively documented (Matočec 1998; Duhem 2010).

Both ITS-based phylogenetic analyses suggested a sister relationship of P. chlamydatum and Subulicystidium. This clade did not include a single accession of P. oberwinkleri (MH041511, ex-holotype) which was, in turn, placed at a distant node as a sister taxon to Luellia cystidiata. It is very unlikely that two species with almost identical LSU sequences possess strongly deviating ITS sequences. LSU and ITS of the holotype of P. oberwinkleri were amplified from different DNA extractions, and specifically ITS originates from DNA extraction experiment in bulk (Ordynets et al. 2018). Therefore, it is possible that accession MH041511 is a contamination representing Luellia-related species from the soils of Madagascar and Réunion, whose fruiting bodies are yet to be discovered. Nonetheless, the ITS region is highly variable in the two largest genera of Hydnodontaceae, Trechispora, and Subulicystidium, as well as sister order Sistotremastrales, which warns of inferring interspecific and intergeneric relationships based on this marker only (Ordynets et al. 2018; de Meiras-Ottoni et al. 2021; Spirin et al. 2021). Therefore, in interpreting the intergeneric relationship in Hydnodontaceae, we relied to a large extent upon the more conservative 28S DNA region.

Three LSU sequences of Palliocystidium deviate from each other to an extent typical for the congeneric material in fungi (cf. Schoch et al. 2012). However, it was surprising that LSU sequence from Venezuela (ex KHL 11042), apart from 9 IUPAC ambiguity symbols, was identical to the holotype of P. chlamydatum (French Guiana). The ratio of the mean spore length (1.46) and width (1.21) between the two specimens also does not exceed 1.5, which is a rule of thumb for judging the conspecificity of two randomly taken specimens in Agaricomycetes (Parmasto and Parmasto 1987). It is possible that the Venezuelan specimen named P. oberwinkleri in fact represents P. chlamydatum. The geographic proximity of the two collecting sites also speaks in favour of this assumption. Therefore, the Venezuelan specimen is treated as P. cf. oberwinkleri in the current study. The same uncertainty should probably be assigned to another Venezuelan specimen FO 14338, but an earlier attempt to amplify its rDNA was unsuccessful (Ordynets et al. 2018). It remains open whether P. oberwinkleri can occur in South America and what is the true species diversity of the genus Palliocystidium.

Our study confirmed several phylogenetic hypotheses recently put forward for Trechisporales as circumscribed by Larsson (2007). Earlier studies focusing on nc rDNA lacked consistent phylogenetic support for the clade known as the “Sistotremastrum family” (Spirin et al. 2021; Liu et al. 2022b). We could overcome this issue by providing high support for Sistotremastrales in both the maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of the 28S data and thus align our results for the order-level relationship with the multigene phylogeny of Liu et al. (2022a). Automated removal of poorly aligned positions from the dataset was probably helpful for this result.

At the Hydnodontaceae family level, different patterns of intergeneric relationship were observed in our and other studies, depending on the depth of taxon and gene sampling. Liu et al. (2022b) were first to place the acystidiate species Pteridomyces galzinii as a sister taxon of Subulicystidium, although the latter was represented by the single species S. tropicum S.H.He & S.L.Liu in their 28S+5.8S data. By considering all 18 Subulicystidium species currently present in public DNA sequence databases, we found P. galzinii as intruding in the Subulicystidium clade and probably contributing to the low branch support for it in the ML analysis of 28S. This pattern did not appear in the 5-gene phylogeny of Liu et al. (2022a), who recovered Subulicystidium as a monophyletic genus. Surprisingly, the latter study also placed Allotrechispora L.W.Zhou & S.L.Liu among cystidiate genera, although the genus morphologically resembles Brevicellicium K.H.Larss. & Hjortstam and Trechispora P.Karst. Our study, and also that of Spirin et al. (2021), refused such a convenient solution proposed by Liu et al. (2019) as genera with prominent cystidia or special encrusted hyphae (Subulicystidium and Fibrodontia, Dextrinocystis and Tubulicium) were segregated from the non-cystidiate ones (Porpomyces, Brevicellicium, and Trechispora incl. Scytinopogon). Further exploration of the intergeneric relationships within Hydnodontaceae and searching for synapomorphic characters in the family remain meaningful. Using longer reads of ribosomal DNA is a worthy improvement for this task, as well as involving additional genetic markers (Liu et al. 2022a). Unfortunately, thin corticioid fruiting bodies of Hydnodontaceae and a general trade-off of DNA quality vs age of the dried corticioid fungal collections prevent the broad application of this approach (Ordynets et al. 2018; Miller et al. 2022).

In light of the inconsistent phylogenetic placement of Palliocystidium and poorly resolved intergeneric relationship within Hydnodontaceae, an additional impediment of the phylogenetic reconstruction should be mentioned. The 28S sequence of the holotype of P. oberwinkleri was exemplified by Kolařík et al. (2021) as having one of the highest GC content among Agaricomycotina Doweld. We could reproduce this result on a smaller taxonomic scale, i.e. orders Trechisporales/Sistotremastrales, and show even the highest GC content of the holotype sequence of P. oberwinkleri in our sampling. A single 28S sequence of P. chlamydatum in this dataset was also among the GC-richest. It should be noted that the accession of P. cf. oberwinkleri did not diverge much in GC content from the median of the dataset. At the species level, deviations in GC content between taxa may indicate differences in lifestyle, i.e. saprotrophy versus some form of symbiosis. Unlike Kolařík et al. (2021), who focused on mycoparasitic Ustilaginomycotina Doweld, it is hard for us to interpret the reasons for GC variation in Hydnodontaceae and in particular in Palliocystidium in the face of limited genetic data and ecological information.

Sequencing environmental samples may help gain additional information about the DNA barcode variation, lifestyle, and taxon distribution. Though likely due to contamination while aiming to sequence DNA from fungal fruiting body, a lineage inhabiting soils of Madagascar and Réunion was elucidated. Without knowing representatives forming fruiting bodies, it would be challenging to integrate this lineage into phylogenetic analyses without a system like UNITE species hypothesis. Currently, 103 (54 non-singleton) species hypotheses are classified within Subulicystidium and 16 (12) within Luellia and mostly lack an associated species epithet in UNITE v.10.0 (Abarenkov et al. 2024).

In the era of the ongoing development of molecular techniques, species identification based on morphological characters remains highly relevant in mycology. We regret that identification keys are missing from many recent publications introducing new species of corticioid fungi. Therefore, we updated the worldwide key to the species of Subulicystidium and complemented it with data on Palliocystidium.

Conclusion

In the newly introduced genus Palliocystidium and genera Subulicystidium and Luellia, there is significant potential for further exploration of species diversity and generic boundaries. Additional intensified fruiting-body-based sampling of taxa and genes is necessary to clarify the relationships of the genera within Hydnodontaceae. Enrichment of molecular analyses with data from high-throughput sequencing of environmental samples can contribute to a better knowledge of species’ lifestyle and distribution.

Acknowledgements

Miroslav Kolařík is acknowledged for discussion on genomic GC content and Nitaro Maekawa for sharing the literature. The director of Forêt et Risques Naturels of the French forestry office (ONF-DRFRN), and Paris French Museum (Patrinat) are acknowledged for funding the field trip. CNRS and Jennifer Devillechabrolle (ONF, Nourague Reserve manager) are acknowledged for the perfect organization of GG’s stay at the Nourague scientific station in French Guiana. We thank reviewers and editors for commenting on the manuscript, which substantially improved its quality.

References

  • Abarenkov K, Tedersoo L, Nilsson RH, Vellak K, Saar I, Veldre V, Parmasto E, Prous M, Aan A, Ots M, Kurina O, Ostonen I, Jõgeva J, Halapuu S, Põldmaa K, Toots M, Truu J, Larsson K-H, Kõljalg U (2010) PlutoF—a web based workbench for ecological and taxonomic research, with an online implementation for fungal ITS sequences. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 6: 189–196. https://doi.org/10.4137/EBO.S6271
  • Abarenkov K, Kõljalg U, Nilsson RH (2022) UNITE species hypotheses matching analysis. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 6: e93856. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.6.93856
  • Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Larsson K-H, Taylor AFS, May TW, Frøslev TG, Pawlowska J, Lindahl B, Põldmaa K, Truong C, Vu D, Hosoya T, Niskanen T, Piirmann T, Ivanov F, Zirk A, Peterson M, Cheeke TE, Ishigami Y, Jansson AT, Jeppesen TS, Kristiansson E, Mikryukov V, Miller JT, Oono R, Ossandon FJ, Paupério J, Saar I, Schigel D, Suija A, Tedersoo L, Kõljalg U (2024) The UNITE database for molecular identification and taxonomic communication of fungi and other eukaryotes: sequences, taxa and classifications reconsidered. Nucleic Acids Research 52: D791–D797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad1039
  • Bengtsson-Palme J, Ryberg M, Hartmann M, Branco S, Wang Z, Godhe A, De Wit P, Sánchez-García M, Ebersberger I, de Sousa F, Amend A, Jumpponen A, Unterseher M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K, Bertrand YJK, Sanli K, Eriksson KM, Vik U, Veldre V, Nilsson RH (2013) Improved software detection and extraction of ITS1 and ITS2 from ribosomal ITS sequences of fungi and other eukaryotes for analysis of environmental sequencing data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4: 914–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12073
  • Boidin J, Gilles G (1988) Basidiomycètes aphyllophorales de l’Ile de la Réunion. XII: Le genre Subulicystidium Parmasto. Bulletin trimestriel de la Société mycologique de France 104: 191–198.
  • Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2016) Terrace aware data structure for phylogenomic inference from supermatrices. Systematic Biology 65: 997–1008. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw037
  • Cubeta M, Echandi E, Abernethy T, Vilgalys R (1991) Characterization of anastomosis groups of binucleate Rhizoctonia species using restriction analysis of an amplified ribosomal RNA gene. Phytopathology 81: 1395–1400. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-81-1395
  • Cunningham GH (1955) Thelephoraceae of New Zealand. Part VI. The genus Peniophora. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand 83: 247–293.
  • Cunningham GH (1963) The Thelephoraceae of Australia and New Zealand. R.E. Owen, Govt. printer, Wellington, 1–358.
  • Desjardin DE, Perry BA (2015) A new species of Scytinopogon from the island of Príncipe, Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe, West Africa. Mycosphere 6: 433–440. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/6/4/5
  • Duhem B (2010) Éléments pour une approche de l’étude des corticiés. I. La sporée. Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 126: 143–160.
  • Dunham SM, Larsson K-H, Spatafora JW (2007) Species richness and community composition of mat-forming ectomycorrhizal fungi in old- and second-growth Douglas-fir forests of the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon, USA. Mycorrhiza 17: 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-007-0141-6
  • Gorjón SP, Greslebin AG, Rajchenberg M (2012) Subulicystidium curvisporum sp. nov. (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) from the Patagonian Andes. Mycotaxon 118: 47–52. https://doi.org/10.5248/118.47
  • Gruhn G, Alvarado P, Hallenberg N, Roy M, Courtecuisse R (2018) Contribution to the taxonomy of Sistotremastrum (Trechisporales, Basidiomycota) and the description of two new species, S. fibrillosum and S. aculeocrepitans. Phytotaxa 379: 27. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.379.1.2
  • Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59: 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010
  • He M-Q, Zhao R-L, Hyde KD, Begerow D, Kemler M, Yurkov A, McKenzie EHC, Raspé O, Kakishima M, Sánchez-Ramírez S, Vellinga EC, Halling R, Papp V, Zmitrovich IV, Buyck B, Ertz D, Wijayawardene NN, Cui B-K, Schoutteten N, Liu X-Z, Li T-H, Yao Y-J, Zhu X-Y, Liu A-Q, Li G-J, Zhang M-Z, Ling Z-L, Cao B, Antonín V, Boekhout T, da Silva BDB, De Crop E, Decock C, Dima B, Dutta AK, Fell JW, Geml J, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Giachini AJ, Gibertoni TB, Gorjón SP, Haelewaters D, He S-H, Hodkinson BP, Horak E, Hoshino T, Justo A, Lim YW, Menolli N, Mešić A, Moncalvo J-M, Mueller GM, Nagy LG, Nilsson RH, Noordeloos M, Nuytinck J, Orihara T, Ratchadawan C, Rajchenberg M, Silva-Filho AGS, Sulzbacher MA, Tkalčec Z, Valenzuela R, Verbeken A, Vizzini A, Wartchow F, Wei T-Z, Weiß M, Zhao C-L, Kirk PM (2019) Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota. Fungal Diversity 99: 105–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4
  • Hibbett DS, Binder M, Bischoff JF, Blackwell M, Cannon PF, Eriksson OE, Huhndorf S, James T, Kirk PM, Lücking R, Thorsten Lumbsch H, Lutzoni F, Matheny PB, McLaughlin DJ, Powell MJ, Redhead S, Schoch CL, Spatafora JW, Stalpers JA, Vilgalys R, Aime MC, Aptroot A, Bauer R, Begerow D, Benny GL, Castlebury LA, Crous PW, Dai Y-C, Gams W, Geiser DM, Griffith GW, Gueidan C, Hawksworth DL, Hestmark G, Hosaka K, Humber RA, Hyde KD, Ironside JE, Kõljalg U, Kurtzman CP, Larsson K-H, Lichtwardt R, Longcore J, Miądlikowska J, Miller A, Moncalvo J-M, Mozley-Standridge S, Oberwinkler F, Parmasto E, Reeb V, Rogers JD, Roux C, Ryvarden L, Sampaio JP, Schüßler A, Sugiyama J, Thorn RG, Tibell L, Untereiner WA, Walker C, Wang Z, Weir A, Weiss M, White MM, Winka K, Yao Y-J, Zhang N (2007) A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi. Mycological Research 111: 509–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2007.03.004
  • Hibbett DS, Bauer R, Binder M, Giachini AJ, Hosaka K, Justo A, Larsson E, Larsson KH, Lawrey JD, Miettinen O, Nagy LG, Nilsson RH, Weiss M, Thorn RG (2014) 14 Agaricomycetes. In: McLaughlin DJ, Spatafora JW (Eds) Systematics and Evolution: Part A. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 373–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55318-9_14
  • Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS (2018) UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35: 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx281
  • Josserand M (1983) La description des champignons supérieurs (Basidiomomycètes charnus). Lechevalier, Paris.
  • Jülich W (1975) Studien an Cystiden-I. Subulicystidium Parm. Persoonia 8: 187–190.
  • Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14: 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28: 1647–1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199
  • Keller J (1985) Les cystides cristallifères des Aphyllophorales. Mycologia Helvetica 1: 277–340.
  • Kolařík M, Wei I-C, Hsieh S-Y, Piepenbring M, Kirschner R (2021) Nucleotide composition bias of rDNA sequences as a source of phylogenetic artifacts in Basidiomycota—a case of a new lineage of a uredinicolous Ramularia-like anamorph with affinities to Ustilaginomycotina. Mycological Progress 20: 1553–1571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-021-01749-x
  • Kõljalg U, Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Larsson K-H, May TW, Taylor AFS, Frøslev TG, Pawłowska J, Lindahl B, Smith ME, Berbee M, Põldmaa K (2023a) SH0892108.09FU. UNITE Community. https://doi.org/10.15156/BIO/SH0892108.09FU
  • Kõljalg U, Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Larsson K-H, May TW, Taylor AFS, Frøslev TG, Pawłowska J, Lindahl B, Smith ME, Berbee M, Põldmaa K (2023b) SH1260357.09FU. UNITE Community. https://doi.org/10.15156/BIO/SH1260357.09FU
  • Langer E (2002) Phylogeny of non-gilled and gilled basidiomycetes: DNA sequence inference, ultrastructure and comparative morphology. Habilitationschrift, University of Tübingen, Germany.
  • Liu S-L, Ma H-X, He S-H, Dai Y-C (2019) Four new corticioid species in Trechisporales (Basidiomycota) from East Asia and notes on phylogeny of the order. MycoKeys 48: 97–113. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.48.31956
  • Liu S-L, He S-H, Liu D-M, Zhou L-W (2021) Two new species of Fibrodontia (Trechisporales, Basidiomycota) with a key to worldwide species. Journal of Fungi 7: 982. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7110982
  • Liu SL, He SH, Wang XW, May TW, He G, Chen SL, Zhou LW (2022a) Trechisporales emended with a segregation of Sistotremastrales ord. nov. (Basidiomycota). Mycosphere 13: 862–954. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/11
  • Liu Z-B, Wu Y-D, Zhao H, Lian Y-P, Wang Y-R, Wang C-G, Mao W-L, Yuan Y (2022b) Outline, divergence times, and phylogenetic analyses of Trechisporales (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota). Frontiers in Microbiology 13: 818358. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.818358
  • Maekawa N (1998) Taxonomic study of Japanese Corticiaceae (Aphyllophorales) IV. Reports of the Tottori Mycological Institute 36: 1–12.
  • Makowski D, Lüdecke D, Patil I, Thériault R, Ben-Shachar M, Wiernik B (2023) Automated results reporting as a practical tool to improve reproducibility and methodological best practices adoption. CRAN. https://easystats.github.io/report/ [accessed 14.01.2025]
  • Matheny PB, Wang Z, Binder M, Curtis JM, Lim YW, Nilsson RH, Hughes KW, Hofstetter V, Ammirati JF, Schoch CL, Langer E, Langer G, McLaughlin DJ, Wilson AW, Frøslev T, Ge Z-W, Kerrigan RW, Slot JC, Yang Z-L, Baroni TJ, Fischer M, Hosaka K, Matsuura K, Seidl MT, Vauras J, Hibbett DS (2007) Contributions of rpb2 and tef1 to the phylogeny of mushrooms and allies (Basidiomycota, Fungi). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43(2): 430–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.08.024
  • Matočec N (1998) The genus Scutellinia (Pezizales, Ascomycotina) in Croatia, II.: Scutellinia barlae and S. minor. Natura Croatica: Periodicum Musei Historiae Naturalis Croatici 7: 91–105. https://hrcak.srce.hr/60101 [accessed 10.06.2021]
  • de Meiras-Ottoni A, Larsson K-H, Gibertoni TB (2021) Additions to Trechispora and the status of Scytinopogon (Trechisporales, Basidiomycota). Mycological Progress 20: 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-021-01667-y
  • Miller AN, Karakehian J, Raudabaugh DB (2022) Next-generation sequencing of ancient and recent fungarium specimens. Journal of Fungi 8: 932. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8090932
  • Mullis KB, Faloona FA (1987) [21] Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. In: Methods in Enzymology. Recombinant DNA Part F. Academic Press, 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)55023-6
  • Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating Maximum-Likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Oberwinkler F (1965) Primitive Basidiomyceten. Revision einiger Formenkreise von Basidienpilzen mit plastischer Basidie. Sydowia 19: 1–72.
  • Oberwinkler F (1977) Species and generic concepts in the Corticiaceae. In: Clemencon H (Ed.) The Species Concept in Hymenomycetes. Cramer, Vaduz, 331–348.
  • Ordynets A, Scherf D, Pansegrau F, Denecke J, Lysenko L, Larsson K-H, Langer E (2018) Short-spored Subulicystidium (Trechisporales, Basidiomycota): high morphological diversity and only partly clear species boundaries. MycoKeys 35: 41–99. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.35.25678
  • Ordynets A, Liebisch R, Lysenko L, Scherf D, Volobuev S, Saitta A, Larsson K-H, Yurchenko E, Buyck B, Bolshakov S, Langer E (2020) Morphologically similar but not closely related: the long-spored species of Subulicystidium (Trechisporales, Basidiomycota). Mycological Progress 19: 691–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-020-01587-3
  • Parmasto E (1968) Conspectus Systematis Corticiacearum. Institutum zoologicum et botanicum Academiae scientiarum R.P.S.S. Estonicae, Tartu, 1–261.
  • Parmasto E, Parmasto I (1987) Variation of basidiospores in the hymenomycetes and its significance to their taxonomy. Bibliotheca Mycologica 115. J. Cramer, Berlin, 1–168.
  • Punugu A, Dunn MT, Welden AL (1980) Peniophoroid fungi of the West Indies. Mycotaxon 10: 428–454.
  • R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 4.1.2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.r-project.org/ [accessed 18.12.2024]
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67: 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  • Rinaldi A, Comandini O, Kuyper TW (2008) Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity: separating the wheat from the chaff. Fungal Diversity 33: 1–45.
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spouge JL, Levesque CA, Chen W, Fungal Barcoding Consortium , Fungal Barcoding Consortium Author List , Bolchacova E, Voigt K, Crous PW, Miller AN, Wingfield MJ, Aime MC, An K-D, Bai F-Y, Barreto RW, Begerow D, Bergeron M-J, Blackwell M, Boekhout T, Bogale M, Boonyuen N, Burgaz AR, Buyck B, Cai L, Cai Q, Cardinali G, Chaverri P, Coppins BJ, Crespo A, Cubas P, Cummings C, Damm U, de Beer ZW, de Hoog GS, Del-Prado R, Dentinger B, Diéguez-Uribeondo J, Divakar PK, Douglas B, Dueñas M, Duong TA, Eberhardt U, Edwards JE, Elshahed MS, Fliegerova K, Furtado M, Garcia MA, Ge Z-W, Griffith GW, Griffiths K, Groenewald JZ, Groenewald M, Grube M, Gryzenhout M, Guo L-D, Hagen F, Hambleton S, Hamelin RC, Hansen K, Harrold P, Heller G, Herrera C, Hirayama K, Hirooka Y, Ho H-M, Hoffmann K, Hofstetter V, Högnabba F, Hollingsworth PM, Hong S-B, Hosaka K, Houbraken J, Hughes K, Huhtinen S, Hyde KD, James T, Johnson EM, Johnson JE, Johnston PR, Jones EBG, Kelly LJ, Kirk PM, Knapp DG, Kõljalg U, Kovács GM, Kurtzman CP, Landvik S, Leavitt SD, Liggenstoffer AS, Liimatainen K, Lombard L, Luangsa-ard JJ, Lumbsch HT, Maganti H, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Martin MP, May TW, McTaggart AR, Methven AS, Meyer W, Moncalvo J-M, Mongkolsamrit S, Nagy LG, Nilsson RH, Niskanen T, Nyilasi I, Okada G, Okane I, Olariaga I, Otte J, Papp T, Park D, Petkovits T, Pino-Bodas R, Quaedvlieg W, Raja HA, Redecker D, Rintoul TL, Ruibal C, Sarmiento-Ramirez JM, Schmitt I, Schüßler A, Shearer C, Sotome K, Stefani FOP, Stenroos S, Stielow B, Stockinger H, Suetrong S, Suh S-O, Sung G-H, Suzuki M, Tanaka K, Tedersoo L, Telleria MT, Tretter E, Untereiner WA, Urbina H, Vágvölgyi C, Vialle A, Vu TD, Walther G, Wang Q-M, Wang Y, Weir BS, Weiß M, White MM, Xu J, Yahr R, Yang ZL, Yurkov A, Zamora J-C, Zhang N, Zhuang W-Y, Schindel D (2012) Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 6241–6246. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117018109
  • Spirin V, Volobuev S, Viner I, Miettinen O, Vlasák J, Schoutteten N, Motato-Vásquez V, Kotiranta H, Hernawati , Larsson K-H (2021) On Sistotremastrum and similar-looking taxa (Trechisporales, Basidiomycota). Mycological Progress 20: 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-021-01682-z
  • Thiers B (2024) Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. https://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih [accessed 11.12.2024]
  • Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen L-T, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2016) W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 44: W232–W235. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw256
  • Van Tuinen D, Zhao B, Gianinazzi-Pearson V (1998) PCR in studies of AM fungi: from primers to application. In: Varma A (Ed.) Mycorrhiza Manual. Springer Lab Manual. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60268-9_24
  • Vanegas-León ML, Sulzbacher MA, Rinaldi AC, Roy M, Selosse M-A, Neves MA (2019) Are Trechisporales ectomycorrhizal or non-mycorrhizal root endophytes? Mycological Progress 18: 1231–1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-019-01519-w
  • Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
  • Weiß M, Oberwinkler F (2001) Phylogenetic relationships in Auriculariales and related groups—hypotheses derived from nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycological Research 105: 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095375620100363X
  • White TJ, Bruns S, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand D, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (Eds) PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, New York, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
  • Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan LD, François R, Grolemund G, Hayes A, Henry L, Hester J, Kuhn M, Pedersen TL, Miller E, Bache SM, Müller K, Ooms J, Robinson D, Seidel DP, Spinu V, Takahashi K, Vaughan D, Wilke C, Woo K, Yutani H (2019) Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software 4: 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
  • Wickham H, Hester J, Francois R, Bryan J, Bearrows S, Posit Software, PBC , https://github.com/mandreyel/ , Jylänki J, Jørgensen M (2022d) readr: read rectangular text data. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readr [accessed 05.01.2023]
  • Wilk J (2012) Smaff - “Statistische Messreihen-Auswertung für Fungi v3.1. ” Südwestdeutsche Pilzrundschau 48: 49–56. http://www.pilzfreun.de/zeitschrift/ [accessed 23.04.2024]
  • Wu F, Zhao C-L (2015) Porpomyces submucidus (Hydnodontaceae, Basidiomycota), a new species from tropical China based on morphological and molecular evidence. Phytotaxa 230: 61–68. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.230.1.5
  • Yu G, Smith DK, Zhu H, Guan Y, Lam TT (2017) ggtree: an R package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8: 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12628
  • Zong T-K, Liu C-M, Wu J-R, Zhao C-L (2021) Trechispora daweishanensis and T. xantha spp. nov. (Hydnodontaceae, Trechisporales) found in Yunnan Province of China. Phytotaxa 479: 147–159. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.479.2.1

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

Guanine-cytosine content of the 321 bp fragment of D1 domain of 28S nc rDNA in the studied members of Trechisporales.

Download file (3.75 kb)
Supplementary material 2 

Phylogenetic relationship of Trechisporales based on Bayesian analysis of ITS nc rDNA sequences. Fifty-percent majority-rule consensus tree with posterior probabilities above the branches is shown. Tips of the tree are annotated according to the generic affiliation of the taxa. Dextrinocystis calamicola is treated as an outgroup. In the clade sister to Luellia cystidiata, no species labels were assigned to the soil-derived DNA sequences because the species and genus identity of the single accession derived from the fruiting body, MH041511, is questioned in this study.

Download file (47.30 kb)
login to comment