<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://plecevo.eu/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">118</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:71cc5dc6-a767-5334-951f-ef6ae8936459</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Plant Ecology and Evolution</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">plecevo</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2032-3913</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2032-3921</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Meise Botanic Garden and Royal Botanical Society of Belgium</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5091/plecevo.169286</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">169286</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="biological_taxon">
          <subject>Angiospermae</subject>
          <subject>Araceae</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Ecology</subject>
          <subject>Morphology &amp; Anatomy</subject>
          <subject>Reproductive Biology</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="geographical_area">
          <subject>Asia</subject>
          <subject>Malaysia</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Specialized fly pollination in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Araceae">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>): high reproductive success in the absence of a trap system</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Low</surname>
            <given-names>Shook Ling</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">shooklinglow@hotmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM), Kepong, Selangor, Malaysia</addr-line>
        <institution>Forest Research Institute Malaysia</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Kepong</addr-line>
        <country>Malaysia</country>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Shook Ling Low (<email xlink:type="simple">lowshookling@frim.gov.my</email>)</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p><bold>Academic editor</bold>: Renate Wesselingh</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>29</day>
        <month>04</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>159</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>268</fpage>
      <lpage>280</lpage>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/B8DBE85F-3173-510E-8B92-F03D52098651">B8DBE85F-3173-510E-8B92-F03D52098651</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>20</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>03</day>
          <month>02</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Shook Ling Low</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p><bold>Background and aims</bold> – While some plants achieve reproductive success through wind or deceptive pollination strategies, many animal-pollinated species depend on mutualistic interactions with pollinators, supported by floral cues, rewards, and microstructural adaptations. Despite the diversity within <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Araceae">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, pollination ecology remains poorly characterized for most species.</p>
        <p><bold>Material and methods</bold> – To address this gap, this study investigates the flowering biology and pollination dynamics of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, with particular focus on pistillate, transitional, and staminate phases of anthesis, followed by infructescence development and seed dispersal. Seeds germination trials were conducted on cotton wool in sealed Petri dishes, and fruit set was quantified from pistillate flower and berry counts. Scanning Electron Microscopy (<abbrev xlink:title="Scanning Electron Microscopy">SEM</abbrev>) was used to examine staminate floral structures and pollen distribution on pollinators.</p>
        <p><bold>Key results</bold> – Three legitimate pollinators were identified, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 2 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 34 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 17 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, along with two non-pollinating insect visitors, forming a co-occurring assemblage. Echinate pollen consistently adhered to the bodies of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies, confirming their role as effective pollinators. Unlike trapping system observed in some aroids, spathe movements in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> regulated pollinator behaviour, allowing repeated visits and efficient pollen transfer. Pollinator diversity declined from the pistillate to staminate phases, with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 2 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> remaining dominant, particularly in creamy green-spathed inflorescences. Overall fruit set exceeded 90%, with creamy melon-red spathes achieving 77.90% and creamy green spathes surpassing 100%.</p>
        <p><bold>Conclusion</bold> – These findings reveal a specialized, non-trapping pollination system in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, enhancing understanding of its mutualistic relationship with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies and contributing new insights into the pollination ecology of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Araceae">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>
          <tp:taxon-name>
            <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Araceae">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part>
          </tp:taxon-name>
        </kwd>
        <kwd>
          <tp:taxon-name>
            <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Diptera">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part>
          </tp:taxon-name>
        </kwd>
        <kwd>echinate pollen ornamentation</kwd>
        <kwd>floral scent</kwd>
        <kwd>plant-pollinator interactions</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="sec1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Pollination is a fundamental ecological process that underpins the reproductive success and genetic diversity of flowering plants. Approximately 90% of flowering plants depend on pollinators for successful reproduction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Stephens et al. 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Tong et al. 2023</xref>), underscoring the importance of these interactions in maintaining ecosystem stability. Plant-pollinator relationships are remarkably complex, often arising through independent or convergent evolution to enhance the fitness of both partners. Such interactions have contributed significantly to biodiversity and resilience of food webs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">van der Kooi et al. 2021</xref>).</p>
      <p>Over evolutionary time, these associations have driven the diversification of a wide array of floral traits, with natural selection favouring features that improve pollination efficiency. Variations in floral colour, shape, scent, and timing of flowering (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fenster et al. 2004</xref>) have evolved as specialised responses to pollinator preferences and behaviours. Pollinators are primarily attracted to flowers by scent and visual cues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Wright and Schiestl 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">van der Kooi et al. 2023</xref>). Although flowers or inflorescences may appear outwardly uniform, they often conceal structural adaptations finely tuned to attract specific pollinators. Attributes such as floral tube length, pistil and stamen morphology, and the spatial arrangement of floral organs can strongly influence pollinator effectiveness and thus promote reproductive success (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Alexandersson and Johnson 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Nattero et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Solís-Montero and Vallejo-Marín 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">De Jager and Peakall 2019</xref>).</p>
      <p>In tropical plant families such as <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Araceae">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, plant-pollinator interactions often achieve a high degree of specialization. Members of this family possess a characteristic inflorescence composed of a spadix, which bears the flowers, and a surrounding spathe, which can function in visual or olfactory attraction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mayo et al. 1997</xref>). Certain genera, including <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Anthurium">Anthurium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Schott, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Monstera">Monstera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Adans., and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spathiphyllum">Spathiphyllum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Schott, exhibit distinct adaptations to specific insect pollinators (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Gibernau 2016</xref>). Three main pollination strategies are recognised in <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Araceae">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chartier et al. 2014</xref>): two are mutualistic where insects receive rewards such as pollen, and/or reproductive sites for mating and oviposition, while the third is antagonistic, relying on deceptive pollination where inflorescences mimic oviposition sites or reproductive resources to attract pollinators without offering actual benefit. These strategies occur across <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Araceae">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> with both bisexual and unisexual flowers: bisexual-flowered with floral rewards, whereas unisexual flowers are often associated with trap-type or deceptive pollination systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chartier et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Díaz Jiménez et al. 2019</xref>). Studies in tropical Asia have documented a diverse array of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Araceae">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> pollinators and insect visitors, including beetles from <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Hydrophilidae">Hydrophilidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Latreille (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cycreon">Cycreon</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Orchymont, 1919), <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Chrysomelidae">Chrysomelidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Latreille, and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Scarabaeidae">Scarabaeidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Latreille (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Parastasia">Parastasia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Westwood, 1842 spp., <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Peltonotus">Peltonotus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Burmeister, 1847 spp.); as well as drosophilid flies exclusively in the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Meijere, 1914 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Takenaka 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Gibernau 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Arriaga-Varela et al. 2018</xref>). Pollination systems involving <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> are mutualistic, providing nutritive and reproductive rewards to flower-breeding flies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Sultana et al. 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Takenaka 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Takenaka Takano et al. 2012</xref>). These flies visit inflorescences primarily to feed, mate, and oviposit within the floral chamber, where floral scents attract them to the female zone; pollen becomes attached to their bodies as they exit and visit subsequent inflorescences, thereby transferring pollen between flowers and facilitating fertilization in their host plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Yafuso 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Miyake and Yafuso 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Takenaka Takano et al. 2012</xref>). Within this system, insect behaviour and pollination is “forced” by a combination of morphotemporal changes in the spathe, including its temporary closure during the female phase and reopening during the male phase, as well as associated changes in colour, scent emission, and surface properties that regulate insect movement and timing of release (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bröderbauer et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Ulrich et al. 2012</xref>). Structural diversity of the spadix, including variation in staminate flowers and thecae horns, is thought to further enhance pollinator visitation and pollen acquisition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Low et al. 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Low and Wong 2022</xref>).</p>
      <p>Pollination efficiency can also depend on how pollen is extruded and deposited on pollinators (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Koski et al. 2018</xref>), traits closely linked to pollen surface ornamentation. Within <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Araceae">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, pollen morphology is highly variable, including psilate, echinate (spiny), reticulate, and verrucate, each likely adapted to different pollinator group (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Grayum 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">van der Ham et al. 1998</xref>). Although pollen-pollinator interactions are often taxon-dependent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Sannier et al. 2009</xref>), echinate pollen is frequently associated with fly pollination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Grayum 1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Sannier et al. 2009</xref>).</p>
      <p>Within the tribe <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Schismatoglottideae">Schismatoglottideae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Schott, an Asian genus with bisexual flowers, is distinctive as the only genus bearing echinate pollen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Thanikaimoni 1969</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Ulrich et al. 2012</xref>), whereas other genera, including <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Schismatoglottis">Schismatoglottis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Zoll. &amp; Moritzi possess smooth pollen surfaces (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Cusimano et al. 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Low and Wong 2022</xref>). Despite comprising 12 accepted species, the pollination ecology of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> remains poorly documented. Existing research has focused mainly on <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="acuminatissima">acuminatissima</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Schott) S.Y.Wong &amp; P.C.Boyce, particularly in spathe movements and pollen morphology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Ulrich et al. 2012</xref>). Evidence from other aroids suggests that pollen often adheres to pollinators’ bodies during staminate anthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Maia et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Takenaka Takano et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Gottsberger et al. 2020</xref>). In <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Alocasia">Alocasia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macrorrhizos">macrorrhizos</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (L.) G.Don, flies are attracted to female-phase flowers. They feed, mate, and oviposit, and on the second day, when pollen is released, they leave the inflorescence covered in pollen for transfer to the next receptive flower (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Takenaka Takano et al. 2012</xref>). Yet, detailed microscopic documentation of where pollen adhered on the insects’ bodies remains scarce. The presence of echinate pollen in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> suggests a potential specialisation, where pollinator attraction and efficient pollen transfer could enhance reproductive success. A comprehensive synthesis of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> pollination, similar to studies on other <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Schismatoglottideae">Schismatoglottideae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> taxa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Low et al. 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Low and Wong 2022</xref>), is therefore needed. Moreover, unlike many aroids, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> appears to attract rather than trap insects, with visitors seemingly “choose” to stay within the inflorescence, making behavioural observations especially valuable for understanding mutualistic dynamics.</p>
      <p>Building on this context, the present study investigates pollination interactions between <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies, with emphasis on floral traits that facilitate pollinator attraction, pollen distribution, and reproductive success. Scanning Electron Microscopy (<abbrev xlink:title="Scanning Electron Microscopy">SEM</abbrev>) was used to examine staminate floral microstructures and pollen grains of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, as well as pollen loads on <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies. In addition, seed germination trials were performed to assess reproductive success beyond pollination. Together, this study aims to improve understanding of plant-pollinator relationships in tropical ecosystems and highlight ecological strategies that sustain diversity within the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Schismatoglottideae">Schismatoglottideae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
      <title>Material and methods</title>
      <sec sec-type="Study site" id="sec3">
        <title>Study site</title>
        <p>Fieldwork on <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was carried out along the forest edge adjoining farmland in Cameron Highlands, Pahang, Malaysia. The study population comprised approximately 150 mature terrestrial plants, typically occurring in mesophytic habitats and occasionally near muddy stream banks. Observations on flowering biology were conducted between February and April 2016, with peak flowering likely in late February, as inferred from the abundance of developing infructescences in March.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Observations on anthesis, pollination, seed dispersal, and seed germination" id="sec4">
        <title>Observations on anthesis, pollination, seed dispersal, and seed germination</title>
        <p>Anthesis was recorded and floral visitors of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were observed during the pistillate, transitional, and staminate phases. Detailed observations focused on floral traits such as spathe movements, the presence or absence of perceptible floral scent, and the behaviour of pollinators and other floral visitors. These qualitative observations were conducted during field visits across all three floral phases in the 10 inflorescences monitored for flowering and pollinator behaviour. Particular attention was given to whether spathe constriction or staminode expansion occurred during anthesis, based on qualitative visual observations. Spathe opening was measured only at the onset of anthesis, while subsequent changes in spathe and staminode form were monitored observationally, as these features in some aroids restrict insect movement.</p>
        <p>In total, 59 inflorescences were randomly selected from different individuals, which were temporarily marked to ensure that each plant was sampled only once. Of these, 10 were monitored for flowering and pollinator behaviour during both daytime and nocturnal field observations, while 49 (27 at pistillate anthesis and 22 at staminate anthesis) were bagged for insect sampling. During this study, brief field observations indicated approximately equal occurrence of creamy green and creamy melon-red spathe morphs within the population. For each morph, insect visitation rates were recorded and analysed using generalized linear models equivalent to a two-way ANOVA in R v.4.5.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">R Core Team 2025</xref>).</p>
        <p>To test whether the upper spadix alone attracted the same insect species, three pistillate-phase inflorescences had their upper spadices and spathe limbs excised and placed approximately 100 m from the mother plants. All insects collected from the bagged inflorescences and excised spadices were preserved in 70% ethanol and identified to species level. Fly specimens were sorted into morphotypes and gender and compared to the reference material and descriptions in the DrosWLD database (<ext-link xlink:href="https://evolgen.biol.se.tmu.ac.jp/DrosWLD/modules/stdb/" ext-link-type="uri">https://evolgen.biol.se.tmu.ac.jp/DrosWLD/modules/stdb/</ext-link>). Undescribed morphotypes were assigned tentative species names (see also <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Sultana et al. 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Fartyal et al. 2013</xref>; Toda unpublished database) pending formal taxonomic treatment.</p>
        <p>Infructescence development was monitored in 20 post-staminate inflorescences, comprising 10 from the intensively observed group and 10 randomly selected in the field, each from a separate individual, until seed dispersal. For seed germination trials, 600 seeds taken randomly from three infructescences were cultivated on cotton wool in sealed Petri dishes.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Reproductive success" id="sec5">
        <title>Reproductive success</title>
        <p>Because flowering and fruiting were not synchronous, reproductive success was assessed using separate sets of individuals: 20 pistillate inflorescences and 20 infructescences. Fruit set was calculated as the ratio of berries to pistillate flowers. As pistillate flower and berry counts were obtained from different individuals, calculated fruit set values could exceed 100%; therefore, fruit set values were normalised to a maximum of 100% to facilitate comparative analyses across individuals. Seed counts per berry and infructescence were not determined because the infructescences were only partially mature. All collected flowers and infructescences were preserved in 70% ethanol.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)" id="sec6">
        <title>Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)</title>
        <p>Five randomly selected staminate flowers of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from the 49 bagged inflorescences were dissected under a stereomicroscope and dehydrated through an ethanol series to absolute ethanol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Low et al. 2016</xref>). Samples were transferred to pure acetone and dried using a critical point drier (BALTEC CPD030) with CO<sub>2</sub> as the transitional medium. Dried specimens were mounted on aluminium plate, sputter-coated with gold using an Auto Fine Coater (JEOL JFC-1600), and imaged with a JEOL JSL-6390LA <abbrev xlink:title="Scanning Electron Microscopy">SEM</abbrev> (JEOL, Peabody, MA, USA). Images were captured at 10 kV accelerating voltage, with a working distance of 10–13 mm and magnifications ranging from 30× to 10,000×.</p>
        <p>To visualise pollen distribution on pollinators, two to three randomly selected specimens of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp. collected at pistillate and staminate anthesis were similarly mounted, gold-coated, and scanned under <abbrev xlink:title="Scanning Electron Microscopy">SEM</abbrev>.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec7">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec sec-type="Floral morphology of Apoballis mutata" id="sec8">
        <title>Floral morphology of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic></title>
        <p>The synflorescence of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> produced up to four sequential inflorescences blooming consecutively. Inflorescences were borne on erect peduncles; and the spathe showed a constriction aligned with the sterile zone between the pistillate and staminate flowers zones. The spathe comprised an upper spathe limb and a lower pollination chamber (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1D, E</xref>). Two spathe colour morphs occurred at roughly equal frequency within the population: creamy green and creamy melon-red, which matched the petiole colour of the respective plant. In the creamy green morph, prominent white, stalk-like staminodes larger than the pistils were interspersed among the pistillate flowers (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1B</xref>). These staminodes varied in form between clavate to mushroom-shaped or globose, were arranged 3–4 rows above the pistillate zone. In contrast, the creamy melon-red morph lacked staminodes within the pistillate region, showing only a partial row above it (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1C</xref>). Both morphs contained a naked sterile interstice with scattered atypical bisexual flowers (<abbrev xlink:title="atypical bisexual flowers">ABF</abbrev>), usually occurring in cluster of 2–4 flowers. The staminate zone consisted of dense stamens with truncated, rectangular to dumbbell-shaped surfaces and slightly grooved connectives. The spadix terminated in an appendix bearing irregular polygonal staminodes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1B, C</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F1">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.5091/plecevo.169286.figure1</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">9916F48A-C733-5806-8A66-E69DB9B257BA</object-id>
          <label>Figure 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Habitat, flowering mechanism, pollinators and insect visitors, seed dispersal, and seedling establishment in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. <bold>A</bold>. Individual plant in the wild. <bold>B</bold>, <bold>C</bold>. Spadix features associated with green spathe (B) and melon-red spathe (C). <bold>D</bold>, <bold>E</bold>. Inflorescences at the onset of pistillate anthesis. <bold>F</bold>, <bold>G</bold>. Windows cut to reveal the behaviour of pollinators at pistillate anthesis. <bold>H</bold>. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cycreon">Cycreon</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. <bold>I</bold>, <bold>J</bold>. Inflorescences at staminate anthesis; note the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> covered with pollen. <bold>K</bold>. Developing infructescence. <bold>L</bold>. Infructescence shedding fruits. <bold>M</bold>. Seeds on cotton wool. <bold>N</bold>. Seedlings.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="plecevo-159-268-g001.jpg" id="oo_1611301.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1611301</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Anthesis and pollination strategy" id="sec9">
        <title>Anthesis and pollination strategy</title>
        <p>Stigma receptivity in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> typically began around 08:30 (local time, UTC +8.00), coinciding with initial spathe opening (approximately 5 cm × 5 mm) at the intermediate spadix zone (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1D–F</xref>). This marked the onset of the pistillate phase. During this period, the appendix emitted a sweet fruity scent that may help to attract pollen-bearing <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies. These flies entered along the spathe margin into the lower chamber, where they contacted receptive pistillate flowers (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1D–G</xref>). Occasionally, the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies were observed feeding on the inner spathe surface, possibly on secretions of tissues. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cycreon">Cycreon</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> beetles were also present (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1H</xref>), but they remained on the spathe margin or upper inner spathe and did not access the pollination chamber. By the afternoon the transitional phase began, stigma receptivity was lost, and floral scent diminished, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies moved upward to the inner spathe surface. No spathe constriction or staminode expansion were observed during the pistillate or transitional phases; the spathe remained inflated and open, allowing free insect movement.</p>
        <p>Anthesis of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> lasted approximately 26 h. The staminate phase began on the following morning. Around 08:00, the spathe began to tighten (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1I, J</xref>), accompanied by faint scent release, and pollen dehiscence commenced from the staminate flowers. At this stage, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies congregated near the staminate zone or on the outer spathe, where powdery pollen was released from the thecae pores, covering their bodies (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1I, J</xref>).</p>
        <p>After anthesis, the upper spathe and spadix abscised within five days, initiating fruit development within the lower spathe (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1K</xref>). Berries of approximately 2 mm in length matured over approximately one month, turning from light green to light yellow as the spathe split open (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1L</xref>).</p>
        <p>Randomly selected seeds of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were cultivated immediately after infructescence dehiscence on cotton wool in sealed Petri dishes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1M</xref>). Germination began after three weeks (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1N</xref>), indicated by the emergence of the first leaf. The majority of the seeds germinated successfully, indicating high viability.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Insect visitors and pollinator composition" id="sec10">
        <title>Insect visitors and pollinator composition</title>
        <p>From the 49 bagged <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> inflorescences, a total of 3041 <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 2 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (mean ± SD: 62.06 ± 38.65 individuals per inflorescence; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2B</xref>), 320 <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 17 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (6.53 ± 6.66; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2C</xref>), 729 <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 34 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (14.86 ± 10.52; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2D</xref>), and 2 <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 1 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (0.04 ± 0.20; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A</xref>) were collected (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>; Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>). The overall sex ratio of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp. was approximately 1:1 (1919 ♀; 2173 ♂; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2G</xref>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). Based on counts summarised in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 2 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> occurred in comparable proportions during pistillate (53.24%) and staminate (46.76%) phases. In contrast, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 17 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 34 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> declined markedly from the pistillate to the staminate stage: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 17 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from 79.69% to 20.31%, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 34 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from 74.86% to 25.24%. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 1 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was incidental, represented by a single individual at each anthesis phase. Per-inflorescence abundances across species, anthesis phases, and spathe colour are illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2E</xref> and are consistent with these patterns. Three dissected pistillate-phase inflorescences showed the predominance of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 2 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> both in the lower chamber and in the upper spathe (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cycreon">Cycreon</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> beetles were rare visitors (38 in total; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2E</xref>; Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F2">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.5091/plecevo.169286.figure2</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">822CC460-8707-5735-B51C-D8EBD1659A05</object-id>
          <label>Figure 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species and their occurrence frequencies in the inflorescences of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. <bold>A</bold>. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 1 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. <bold>B</bold>. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 2 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. <bold>C</bold>. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 17 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. <bold>D</bold>. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 34 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. <bold>E</bold>. Number of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cycreon">Cycreon</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> beetles per <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> inflorescence categorized by anthesis phases (P: pistillate, S: staminate) and spathe colour (R: creamy melon-red, G: creamy green). <bold>F</bold>. Mean numbers (± SD) of individual <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cycreon">Cycreon</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> beetles recorded per inflorescence during pistillate and staminate anthesis. P values indicate the statistical significance of differences between spathe colour morphs for each insect taxon. <bold>G</bold>. Number of pistillate flowers per inflorescence and number of berries per infructescence of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (N = 20). Scale bars: A–D = 1 mm. Photos A–D by Masonori J. Toda.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="plecevo-159-268-g002.jpg" id="oo_1611302.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1611302</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Pollinator and insect visitors found on the inflorescences of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (N = 49 inflorescences).</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Anthesis phase</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Sex of insect visitor</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 2 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic></bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 17 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic></bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 34 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic></bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 1 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic></bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <italic>
                      <tp:taxon-name>
                        <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cycreon">Cycreon</tp:taxon-name-part>
                      </tp:taxon-name>
                    </italic>
                  </bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">Pistillate anthesis</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Female</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">686</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">111</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">270</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">29</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Male</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">784</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">134</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">229</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">Staminate anthesis</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Female</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">610</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">37</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">85</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Male</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">812</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">28</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">99</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">Dissected upper spathe and spadix – Pistillate anthesis</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Female</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">65</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0</td>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Male</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">41</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">Dissected lower spathe and spadix – Pistillate anthesis</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Female</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">24</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">19</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0</td>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Male</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">19</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">15</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3041</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">320</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">729</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">38</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mean ± SD</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">62.06 ± 38.65</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6.53 ± 6.66</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">14.86 ± 10.52</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.04 ± 0.20</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.76 ± 1.22</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Range (min–max)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0–147</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0–23</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0–55</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0–1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0–6</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">% at pistillate anthesis</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">53.24</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">79.69</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">74.86</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">50</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">81.58</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">% at staminate anthesis</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">46.76</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20.31</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">25.24</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">50</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">18.42</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sex ratio (♀ : ♂) in total</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1385 : 1656</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">154 : 166</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">378 : 351</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2 : 0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sex ratio (♀ : ♂) at pistillate anthesis</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">775 : 844</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">117 : 138</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">293 : 252</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 : 0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sex ratio (♀ : ♂) at staminate anthesis</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">610 : 812</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">37 : 28</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">85 : 99</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 : 0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Visitation patterns to the two spathe colour morphs showed minimal differences across anthesis phases. In creamy melon-red spathes, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 2 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was abundant and occurred in broadly comparable proportions during pistillate (1172 individuals; 58.08%) and staminate (846 individuals; 41.92%) phases (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2E</xref>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>; Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>). <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 17 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (79.82%) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 34 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (77.71%) both decreased substantially in the staminate phase (20.18% for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 17 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and 22.29% for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 34 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) irrespective of spathe colour (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2E</xref>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>; Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>). In creamy green spathes, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 2 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> increased slightly from pistillate (447 individuals; 43.70%) to staminate (576 individuals; 56.30%) phases. Generalised linear models revealed no significant effects of spathe colour on visitation rates for any <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species or <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cycreon">Cycreon</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> beetles (all p values &gt; 0.05; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2F</xref>). Predicted mean numbers of insect visitors were similar between creamy melon-red and creamy green spathes at both anthesis phases, indicating that spathe colour does not significantly influence <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> abundance in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
        <table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Pollinator and insect visitors found in the inflorescences of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. The inflorescences are categorized according to the anthesis phases and spathe colour.</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Anthesis phases / spathe colour</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 2 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic></bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 17 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic></bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 34 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic></bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 1 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic></bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <italic>
                      <tp:taxon-name>
                        <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cycreon">Cycreon</tp:taxon-name-part>
                      </tp:taxon-name>
                    </italic>
                  </bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pistillate anthesis / creamy melon-red spathe (N = 18)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1172</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">174</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">401</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">23</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Means ± SD</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">65.11 ± 34.79</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">9.67 ± 6.19</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">22.28 ± 10.83</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.28 ± 1.56</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Staminate anthesis / creamy melon-red spathe (N = 13)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">846</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">44</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">115</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Means ± SD</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">65.08 ± 43.74</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.38 ± 4.81</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8.85 ± 7.36</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.08 ± 0.28</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.39 ± 0.65</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">% at pistillate anthesis / creamy melon-red spathe</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">58.08</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">79.82</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">77.71</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">82.14</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">% at staminate anthesis / creamy melon-red spathe</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">41.92</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20.18</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">22.29</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">100</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">17.86</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pistillate anthesis / creamy green spathe (N = 9)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">447</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">81</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">143</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Means ± SD</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">49.67 ± 48.05</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">9.00 ± 8.76</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">15.89 ± 6.05</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.11 ± 0.33</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.89 ± 1.36</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Staminate anthesis / creamy green spathe (N = 9)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">576</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">21</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">69</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mean ± SD</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">64 ± 31.58</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.33 ± 2.96</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">7.67 ± 7.38</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.22 ± 0.44</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">% at pistillate anthesis / creamy green spathe</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">43.70</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">79.41</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">67.45</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">100</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">80</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">% at staminate anthesis / creamy green spathe</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">56.30</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20.59</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">32.55</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Reproductive success" id="sec11">
        <title>Reproductive success</title>
        <p>Reproductive success was assessed using separate sets of individuals, comprising 20 pistillate inflorescences and 20 infructescences. Across 20 pistillate inflorescences, a total of 7746 pistillate flowers were counted, with a mean 387 ± 82 (SD) pistillate flowers per inflorescence. Twenty infructescences yielded 7164 berries, averaging 358 ± 73 (SD) berries per infructescence. Based on these averages, overall fruit set was 92.49% (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2G</xref>; Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S2">2</xref>).</p>
        <table-wrap id="T3" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Numbers of pistillate flowers and of fruits, and the percentage fruit set in inflorescences and infructescences with creamy melon-red or creamy green spathe of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (N = 20)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Creamy melon-red spathe (N = 10)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Creamy green spathe (N = 10)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total pistillate flowers (N = 20)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">7756</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4258</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3488</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mean ± SD</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">387 ± 82</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">425.8 ± 80.99</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">348.8 ± 64.72</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total berries (N = 20)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">7164</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3317</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3847</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mean ± SD</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">358 ± 73</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">331.7 ± 56.79</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">384.7 ± 81.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">% Fruit set</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">92.49</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">77.90</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">110.29</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>When analysed by spathe colour, creamy melon-red spathes averaged 425.8 ± 80.99 pistillate flowers per infructescence and 331.7 ± 56.79 berries per infructescence, corresponding to a fruit set of 77.90%. Creamy green spathes averaged 348.8 ± 64.72 SD pistillate flowers and 384.7 ± 81.00 SD berries (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2G</xref>), although the unnormalized berry-to-flower ratio resulting in a calculated fruit set of 110.29%, values were normalised to a maximum of 100% (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Scanning Electron Microscopy" id="sec12">
        <title>Scanning Electron Microscopy</title>
        <p><abbrev xlink:title="Scanning Electron Microscopy">SEM</abbrev> revealed similar stamen morphology in both spathe morphs in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A–E</xref>). Stamens exhibited smooth papilla surfaces with few stomata (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3C</xref>). Thecae pores were membranous and sealed during pistillate anthesis (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3B</xref>), rupturing prior to pollen release in the staminate phase (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3D</xref>). Dense spiny pollen extruded from the pore slits adhered to papillae or lodged between papilla cells (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3E</xref>). Pollen grains were spiny, globose, and approximately 15 μm in diameter (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3F</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F3">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.5091/plecevo.169286.figure3</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">7794CCBF-0742-5D95-B1C1-057B2F019061</object-id>
          <label>Figure 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Microstructures of stamens, and pollinators in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> at staminate anthesis. <bold>A</bold>. Stamens at pistillate anthesis, each with two sealed thecae pores. <bold>B</bold>. Sealed thecae pore. <bold>C</bold>. Smooth papilla cell surface with several stomata. <bold>D</bold>. Stamen at staminate anthesis; note the ruptured thecae pores revealing pollen extrusion. <bold>E</bold>. Adherent pollen on the papilla cells. <bold>F</bold>. Pollen. <bold>G</bold>. Ventral surface of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> fly covered with pollen. <bold>H</bold>, <bold>I</bold>. Pollen adherent on legs. <bold>J</bold>, <bold>M</bold>. Pollen adherent on the head and mouth parts. <bold>K</bold>. Dorsal surface covered with pollen. <bold>L</bold>. Pollen on wings. <bold>N</bold>, <bold>O</bold>. Side surface covered with pollen. Scale bars: A = 200 μm; B, C, H = 50 μm; D, I, J, L–N = 100 μm; E = 10 μm; F = 5 μm; G, K, O = 500 μm.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="plecevo-159-268-g003.jpg" id="oo_1611303.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1611303</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>During staminate anthesis, spiny pollens were found deposited on multiple parts of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies’ bodies, including the mouthparts, thorax, abdomen, wings, legs, and head (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3G–O</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec13">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <sec sec-type="Flowering biology and pollination strategy" id="sec14">
        <title>Flowering biology and pollination strategy</title>
        <p>Consistent with other unisexual-flowered genera in the tribe <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Schismatoglottideae">Schismatoglottideae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Low et al. 2014</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hoe and Wong 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hoe et al. 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Low and Wong 2022</xref>), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> exhibits a short protogynous anthesis sequence. The brief overlap of pistillate and staminate phases, approximately 30 minutes, minimizes the gap between pollen release and stigma receptivity, improving pollen transfer efficiency, a key feature in tropical <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Araceae">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Soonthornkalump et al. 2020</xref>). Pollen longevity varies within the family. For example, in neotropical <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Araceae">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> with bisexual flowers, such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Anaphyllopsis">Anaphyllopsis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="americana">americana</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Engl.) A.Hay, small pollen grains remain viable for several days due to long flowering cycles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Barabé et al. 2008</xref>). In contrast, in unisexual species with short flowering cycles, such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Montrichardia">Montrichardia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="arborescens">arborescens</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Schott, pollen viability drops by half within 24 h (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Barabé et al. 2008</xref>). <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> also possesses unisexual flowers and exhibit a comparatively short anthesis lasting approximately 26 h. The relatively large, spiny pollen grains of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and its short anthesis suggests an adaptation for rapid and effective pollen transfer within a narrow temporal window. Similar associations between short flowering duration, pollen morphology, and fly pollination have been reported in other aroids pollinated by dipterans, including <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Arisaema">Arisaema</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Mart. and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasia">Colocasia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Schott species, where pollen is transferred during brief staminate phases by flower-breeding or visiting flies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Sultana et al. 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Takenaka 2006</xref>).</p>
        <p>The sweet fruity fragrance emitted during anthesis appears to be the main attractant for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies. This differs from the benzaldehyde almond oil-like scent reported in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="acuminatissima">acuminatissima</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Ulrich et al. 2010</xref>), however, whether this scent also specifically attracts <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies remains unknown. Such variation in scent likely explains differences in pollinator assemblages between species. For example, in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Arum">Arum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="maculatum">maculatum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> L., population-level scent differences were associated with shifts in dominant pollinator guilds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gfrerer et al. 2023</xref>). Thus, scent chemistry may play a central role in mediating pollinator specificity in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. In <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, multiple <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species were recorded sharing inflorescences. This synhospitalic behaviour, where several fly species occupy a single inflorescence, has also been reported in other aroids such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Alocasia">Alocasia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="odora">odora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Rob. ex Lodd., G.Lodd. &amp; W.Lodd.) Spach (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Toda et al. 2022</xref>). However, the scent profile of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Alocasia">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="odora">odora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> differs from that of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and synhospitality in these systems appears to be driven by shared use of floral resources rather than similarity in floral odour.</p>
        <p>Like <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Phymatarum">Phymatarum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> M.Hotta and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Schottarum">Schottarum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> P.C.Boyce &amp; S.Y.Wong (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Low et al. 2016</xref>), the pale spathe colours of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> are unlikely to be primary visual attractants. Instead, the strong floral scent likely the key attractant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Díaz Jiménez et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gfrerer et al. 2023</xref>). Nonetheless, intraspecific variation in spathe colour may reflect genetic or ecological diversity, potentially influencing subtle aspects of pollinator interaction.</p>
        <p>The interaction between <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies is best described as mutualistic, aligning with findings in related taxa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Sultana et al. 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Takenaka 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Takenaka Takano et al. 2012</xref>). In these plants, the flies obtain resources while ensuring pollen transfer. Although experimental test is lacking, repeated visits to pistillate flowers during anthesis, combined with revisits to staminate flowers, strongly suggest cross-pollination and gene flow (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Hu and He 2006</xref>). It is possible that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 2 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is a pollinivorous species consuming pollen while facilitating dispersal (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3J</xref>).</p>
        <p>The adaptations observed in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, such as pollen morphology, and the timing of pollen release relative to pollinator activity, are consistent with strategies reported in other <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Araceae">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> to maximise pollen attachment and transfer. In <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Anthurium">Anthurium</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="acutifolium">acutifolium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Engl., bees (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Paratetrapedia">Paratetrapedia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="chocoensis">chocoensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Anguiar &amp; Melo, 2011) carry pollen on their abdomens and legs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Etl et al. 2017</xref>), whereas in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Anthurium">Anthurium</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="acutangulum">acutangulum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Engl., gall midge (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Cecidomyiidae">Cecidomyiidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Newman) transfer pollen via head contact (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Etl et al. 2022b</xref>). In <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Arisaema">Arisaema</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, fungus gnats (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Mycetophilidae">Mycetophilidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Newman and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Sciaridae">Sciaridae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Billberg) are dusted with pollen as they escape the spathe tube (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Vogel and Martens 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Suetsugu et al. 2021</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Zeng et al. 2023</xref>). Heavy pollen loads have also been documented in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Parastasia">Parastasia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> beetles (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Amorphophallus">Amorphophallus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="napalensis">napalensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Wall.) Bogner &amp; Mayo; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chaturvedi 2017</xref>), Neella bugs (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Syngonium">Syngonium</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="hastiferum">hastiferum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Standl. &amp; L.O.Williams) Croat; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Etl et al. 2022a</xref>), and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Schottarum">Schottarum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Low et al. 2014</xref>). The pollen of these species varies in ornamentation: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Anthurium">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="acutifolium">acutifolium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> has small, smooth pollen; <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Anthurium">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="acutangulum">acutangulum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> has slightly ornamented pollen; <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Arisaema">Arisaema</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species produce fine, smooth pollen; and beetle- or bug-pollinated species such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Amorphophallus">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="napalensis">napalensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Syngonium">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="hastiferum">hastiferum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> typically have granular to slightly sticky pollen. Likewise, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> visitors of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> are often coated with spiny pollen during staminate anthesis, suggesting efficient attachment. In some aroids, sticky resinous exudates further aid adhesion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Hoe et al. 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Gibernau et al. 2021</xref>), though none were observed here.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Pollinator assemblage and visitation behaviour" id="sec15">
        <title>Pollinator assemblage and visitation behaviour</title>
        <p>The principal pollinators of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were three <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 2 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (74.32% of visits; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2B</xref>), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 34 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (17.82%; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2D</xref>), and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 17 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (7.82%; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2C</xref>). <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 1 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was an incidental visitor, with only two observed visits (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2E, F</xref>). <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cycreon">Cycreon</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> beetles were occasional visitors and likely acted as food foragers rather than pollinators, a role seen in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Phymatarum">Phymatarum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Schottarum">Schottarum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Low et al. 2016</xref>). Visitation rates of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies did not vary between spathe colours morphs (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2F</xref>), indicating that spathe colour does not influence pollinator attraction or visitation intensity in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Instead, pollinator behaviour appears to be driven by inflorescence architecture, anthesis timing, scent emission, access to reproductive or nutritive resources, factors known to be more important than visual cues in many fly-pollinated <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Araceae">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Gibernau 2011</xref>).</p>
        <p>Inflorescences in the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Schismatoglottideae">Schismatoglottideae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> typically attract insect visitors from <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Hydrophilidae">Hydrophilidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cycreon">Cycreon</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>), <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Chrysomelidae">Chrysomelidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Coleoptera">Coleoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Drosophilidae">Drosophilidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Diptera">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Takenaka 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Gibernau 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Arriaga-Varela et al. 2018</xref>). Multiple pollinator species can co-occur within the same inflorescence but remain reproductively isolated through behaviours such as mate discrimination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Tanaka et al. 2022</xref>). During pistillate anthesis, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies were seen feeding on stigmatic secretions, moving freely between floral structures and facilitating pollen transfer. They later collected food from the inner spathe and pollen from staminate flowers (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3J</xref>). Observations were consistent across visits, although fine-scale behaviour of each species requires more targeted study.</p>
        <p>Host specificity is well known in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Sultana et al. 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Xiao et al. 2022</xref>). Geographic isolation of aroid hosts may promote specialisation through host-associated ecological divergence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Matsubayashi et al. 2010</xref>), although overlap among host ranges occurs. For example, the dominant <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 2 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is also recorded from <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Anadendrum">Anadendrum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="microstachyum">microstachyum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (de Vriese &amp; Miq.) Backer &amp; Alderw, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Aglaonema">Aglaonema</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="simplex">simplex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Blume, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Schismatoglottis">Schismatoglottis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="rupestris">rupestris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Zoll. &amp; Moritzi ex Zoll. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 17 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> also visits <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Schismatoglottis">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="rupestris">rupestris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, while <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 1 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> occurs on <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Aglaonema">Aglaonema</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pictum">pictum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Kunth and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Schismatoglottis">Schismatoglottis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Takenaka 2006</xref>). In contrast, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 34 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> has not yet been recorded as a pollinator of other aroids.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Reproductive success and fruit set" id="sec16">
        <title>Reproductive success and fruit set</title>
        <p>The high fruit set observed (&gt; 90%) indicates efficient pollination in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Creamy melon-red spathes averaged 77.90% fruit set, while creamy green spathes exceeded 100% (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). Values exceeding 100% likely reflect sampling differences, as pistillate flowers and infructescences were counted on separate individuals.</p>
        <p>Given that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies represented 99% of all recorded insect visitors (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>) and were present exclusively in pollination chamber, their role as primary pollinators is strongly supported.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Pollen morphology and pollinator interactions" id="sec17">
        <title>Pollen morphology and pollinator interactions</title>
        <p>The pollen of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is echinate (spiny) and ~15 μm in diameter, slightly larger than that of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="acuminatissima">acuminatissima</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (~10–12.5 μm; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Ulrich et al. 2012</xref>). This echinate structure contrasts with the smooth (psilate), inaperturate pollen found in other <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Schismatoglottideae">Schismatoglottideae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Thanikaimoni 1969</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Grayum 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hesse 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Ulrich et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Low et al. 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Low and Wong 2022</xref>).</p>
        <p>Pollen traits are often linked with pollination systems and pollinator types (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Sannier et al. 2009</xref>). Spinose pollen in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is frequently linked to fly pollination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Grayum 1992</xref>). <abbrev xlink:title="Scanning Electron Microscopy">SEM</abbrev> confirmed that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies carried pollen during staminate anthesis, with pollen grains found on multiple body parts and no other pollen types detected. Distribution appeared incidental rather than targeted, with spines aiding attachment, supporting the interpretation of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> as specialised but opportunistic pollen carriers.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Conclusion" id="sec18">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>This study provides a detailed account of the pollination dynamics of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, emphasising its close association with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies and highlighting floral traits that support this mutualism. The findings demonstrate that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> departs from the typical trapping strategies of many <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Araceae">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> by employing a non-trapping system. This allows repeated visitation by pollinators and likely contributes to its exceptionally high fruit set. The timing of anthesis, subtle structural changes, and the emission of a sweet fruity fragrance appear to be the key drivers of pollinator attraction. Three main <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 2 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 34 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">C.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 17 aff. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bogneri">bogneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, form a specialized yet coexisting assemblage, effectively transferring pollen as evidenced by the consistent recovery of a single pollen type on their bodies. Their pollen loads and body-wide adherence patterns suggest an efficient but largely opportunistic transport mechanism.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>The author is grateful to Shafri Bin Semawi and Fathiah Abdul Rahim for providing technical assistance with <abbrev xlink:title="Scanning Electron Microscopy">SEM</abbrev> observations of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Further I acknowledge Masonori J. Toda for <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> identification and Alexander G. Kirejtshuk for <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cycreon">Cycreon</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> identification. This work was financially self-supported.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Alexandersson R, Johnson SD (2002) Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Gladiolus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Iridaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269: 631–636. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1098/rspb.2001.1928" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1928</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Arriaga-Varela E, Wong SY, Kirejtshuk A, Fikácek M (2018) Review of the flower-inhabiting water scavenger beetle genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Cycreon</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Coleoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Hydrophilidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), with descriptions of new species and comments on its biology. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 65: 99–115. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/dez.65.26261" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.65.26261</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Barabé D, Lavallée K, Gibernau M (2008) Pollen viability and germination in some neotropical aroids. Botany 86: 98–102. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1139/B07-110" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1139/B07-110</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Bröderbauer D, Diaz A, Weber A (2012) Reconstructing the origin and elaboration of insect-trapping inflorescences in the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. American Journal of Botany 99: 1666–1679. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3732/ajb.1200274" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1200274</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Chartier M, Gibernau M, Renner SS (2014) The evolution of pollinator/plant interaction types in the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Evolution 68: 1533–1543. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/evo.12318" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12318</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Chaturvedi SK (2017) Pollinators and visitors of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Amorphophallus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">napalensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Wall.) Bogner &amp; Mayo (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in Nagaland state, North-east India. Pleione 11: 336–340.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Cusimano N, Bogner J, Mayo SJ, Boyce PC, Wong SY, Hesse M, Hetterscheid WLA, Keating RC, French JC (2011) Relationships within the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: comparison of morphological patterns with molecular phylogenies. American Journal of Botany 98: 1–15. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3732/ajb.1000158" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000158</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>De Jager ML, Peakall R (2019) Experimental examination of pollinator-mediated selection in a sexually deceptive orchid. Annals of Botany 123: 347–354. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/aob/mcy083" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcy083</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Díaz Jiménez P, Heiko H, Aguilar-Rodríguez PA, Krömer T, Chartier M, MacSwiney MC, Gibernau M (2019) A review on the pollination of aroids with bisexual flowers. Annals of Missouri Botanical Garden 104: 83–104. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3417/2018219" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3417/2018219</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Etl F, Franschitz A, Aguiar AJC, Schönenberger J, Dötterl S (2017) A perfume-collecting male oil bee? Evidences of a novel pollination system involving <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Anthurium</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">acutifolium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Paratetrapedia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">chocoensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Apidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe">Tapinotaspidini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Flora 232: 7–25. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.flora.2017.02.020" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2017.02.020</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Etl F, Kaiser C, Reiser O, Schubert M, Dötterl S, Schönenberger J (2022a) Evidence for the recruitment of florivorous plant bugs as pollinators. Current Biology 32: 4688–4698. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.cub.2022.09.013" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.09.013</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Etl F, Francke W, Schönenberger J, Dötterl S (2022b) Chemical attraction of gall midge pollinators (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Cecidomyiidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Cecidomyiinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Anthurium</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">acutangulum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Journal of Chemical Ecology 48: 263–269. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s10886-022-01349-3" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-022-01349-3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Fartyal RS, Gao JJ, Toda MJ, Hu YG, Takano KT, Suwito A, Katoh T, Takigahira T, Yin JT (2013) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Drosophilidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) revised phylogenetically, with a new species group having peculiar lifecycles on monsteroid (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) host plants. Systematic Entomology 38: 763–782. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/syen.12027" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12027</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>Fenster CB, Armbruster WC, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD (2004) Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 375–403. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Gfrerer E, Laina D, Gibernau M, Comes HP, Hörger AC, Dötterl S (2023) Variation in scent amount but not in composition correlates with pollinator visits within populations of deceptive <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Arum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">maculatum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> L. (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 1046532. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3389/fpls.2022.1046532" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1046532</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Gibernau M (2011) Pollinators and visitors of aroid inflorescences: an addendum. Aroideana 34: 70–83.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Gibernau M (2016) Pollinators and visitors of aroid inflorescences III - Phylogenetic &amp; Chemical insights. Aroideana 39: 4–22.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Gibernau M, Maia ACD, Navarro DMDA (2021) Pollination ecology and floral scent chemistry of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Philodendron</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fragrantissimum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Botany Letters 168: 384–394. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/23818107.2021.1909497" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2021.1909497</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Gottsberger G, Silberbauer-Gottsberger I, Dötterl S (2020) Distant populations of a <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Xanthosoma</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) species have different floral scents but the same cyclocephaline beetle pollinators. Acta Botanica Brasilica 34: 580–588. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1590/0102-33062020abb0013" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062020abb0013</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Grayum MH (1986) Correlations between pollination biology and pollen morphology in the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, with some implications for angiosperm evolution. In: Blackmore S, Ferguson I (Eds) Pollen and Spores: Form and Function. Academic Press, London, 313–327.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Grayum MH (1992) Comparative external pollen ultrastructure of the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> and putatively related taxa. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 43: 1–167.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>Hesse M (2005) The fossil history of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> pollen revisited. In: XVII International Botanical Congress, Vienna, 17–23 July 2005, Abstracts book: 131.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>Hoe YC, Wong SY (2016) Floral biology of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Schismatoglottis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">baangongensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in West Sarawak, Borneo. Plant Systematics and Evolution 302: 1239–1252. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s00606-016-1329-z" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-016-1329-z</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>Hoe YC, Gibernau M, Maia ACD, Wong SY (2016) Flowering mechanisms, pollination strategies and floral scent analyses of sympatric co-flowering <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Homalomena</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp. (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) on Borneo. Plant Biology 18: 563–576. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/plb.12431" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12431</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>Hoe YC, Gibernau M, Wong SY (2018) Diversity of pollination ecology in the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Schismatoglottis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subsection">Calyptrata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Complex clade (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Plant Biology 20: 563–578. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/plb.12687" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12687</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>Hu X-S, He F (2006) Seed and pollen flow in expanding a species’ range. Journal of Theoretical Biology 240: 662–672. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.11.002" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.11.002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>Koski MH, Ison JL, Padilla A, Pham AQ, Galloway LF (2018) Linking pollinator efficiency to patterns of pollen limitation: small bees exploit the plant-pollinator mutualism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285(1880): 20180635. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1098/rspb.2018.0635" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0635</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>Low SL, Wong SY (2022) The diversification of thecae horns and their putative significant – A case study of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe">Schismatoglottideae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Organisms Diversity and Evolution 22(4): 843–856. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s13127-022-00573-9" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-022-00573-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>Low SL, Wong SY, Boyce PC (2014) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Schottarum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe">Schismatoglottideae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) substantiated based on combined nuclear and plastid DNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 300: 607–617. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s00606-013-0906-7" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-013-0906-7</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>Low SL, Wong SY, Ooi IH, Hesse M, Städler Y, Schönenberger J, Boyce PC (2016) Floral diversity and pollination strategies of three rheophytic <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe">Schismatoglottideae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Plant Biology 18: 84–97. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/plb.12320" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12320</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <mixed-citation>Maia ACD, Schlindwein C, Navarro DMAF, Gibernau M (2010) Pollination of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Philodendron</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">acutatum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in the Atlantic Forest of noetheastern Brazil: a single scarab beetle species guarantees high fruit set. International Journal of Plant Sciences 171: 740–748. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1086/654846" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1086/654846</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <mixed-citation>Matsubayashi KW, Ohshima I, Nosil P (2010) Ecological speciation in phytophagous insects. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 134: 1–27. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1086/654846" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1086/654846</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <mixed-citation>Mayo SJ, Bogner J, Boyce PC (1997) The genera of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <mixed-citation>Miyake T, Yafuso M (2003) Floral scents affect reproductive success in fly-pollinated <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Alocasia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">odora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). American Journal of Botany 90(3): 370–376. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3732/ajb.90.3.370" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.3.370</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <mixed-citation>Nattero J, Cocucci AA, Medel R (2010) Pollinator-mediated selection in a specialized pollination system: matches and mismatches across populations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23: 1957–1968. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02060.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02060.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <mixed-citation>R Core Team (2025) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.r-project.org/" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.r-project.org/</ext-link> [accessed 13.02.2026]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <mixed-citation>Sannier J, Baker WJ, Anstett M-C, Nadot S (2009) A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> and the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Arecaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, two unrelated families of the monocots. BMC Research Notes 2: 145. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/1756-0500-2-145" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-145</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <mixed-citation>Solís-Montero L, Vallejo-Marín M (2017) Does the morphological fit between flowers and pollinators affect pollen deposition? An experimental test in a buzz-pollinated species with anther dimorphism. Ecology and Evolution 7: 2706–2715. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/ece3.2897" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2897</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <mixed-citation>Soonthornkalump S, Meesawat U, Sutthinon P (2020) Pollen viability and the preliminary study of pollen preservation method of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Amorphophallus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">koratensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Gagnep. (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), the potential exotic ornamental plant. Acta Horticulturae 1298: 183–186. <ext-link xlink:href="10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1298.26" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1298.26</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <mixed-citation>Stephens RE, Gallagher RV, Dun L, Cornwell W, Sauquet H (2023) Insect pollination for most of angiosperm evolutionary history. New Phytologist 240(2): 880–891. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/nph.18993" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18993</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <mixed-citation>Suetsugu K, Sato R, Kakishima S, Okuyama Y, Sueyoshi M (2021) The sterile appendix of two sympatric <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Arisaema</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species lures each specific pollinator into deadly trap flowers. Ecology 102: e03242. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/ecy.3242" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3242</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <mixed-citation>Suetsugu K, Nishigaki H, Fukushima S, Ishitani E, Kakishima S, Sueyoshi M (2022) Thread-like appendix on <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Arisaema</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">urashima</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) attracts fungus gnat pollinators. Ecology 103: e3782. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/ecy.3782" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3782</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <mixed-citation>Sultana F, Hu Y-G, Toda MJ, Takenaka K, Yafuso M (2006) Phylogeny and classification of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Drosophilidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), and its evolution of pollination mutualism with aroid plants. Systematic Entomology 31: 684–702. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-3113.2006.00344.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2006.00344.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <mixed-citation>Takenaka K (2006) Reproductive ecology of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Drosophilidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and pollination mutualism with <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> plants. PhD Dissertation, Hokkaido University, Japan.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <mixed-citation>Takenaka Takano K, Repin R, Mohamed MB, Toda MJ (2012) Pollination mutualism between <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Alocasia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">macrorrhizos</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and two taxonomically undescribed <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Drosophilidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in Sabah, Borneo. Plant Biology 14: 555–564. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00541.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00541.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <mixed-citation>Tanaka R, Takekata H, Ishikawa Y, Kamikouchi A (2022) Mate discrimination of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">xenalocasiae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">alocasiae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Drosophilidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) as a possible factor contributing to their co-existence on the same host plant. Journal of Insect Behavior 35: 44–55. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s10905-022-09798-0" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-022-09798-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47">
        <mixed-citation>Thanikaimoni G (1969) Esquisse palynologique des Aracées. Travaux de la Section Scientifique et Technique, Institut Français de Pondichéry 5: 1–31.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48">
        <mixed-citation>Toda MJ, Takano KT, Katoh T, Xiao L, Gao J-J, Yafuso M (2022) Coexistence mechanisms of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Drosophilidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) sharing inflorescences of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Alocasia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">odora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) as a host plant: comparison between two- and three-species systems. Entomological Science 25: e12506. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/ens.12506" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12506</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B49">
        <mixed-citation>Tong Z-Y, Wu L-Y, Feng H-H, Zhang M, Armbruster WS, Renner SS, Huang S-Q (2023) New calculations indicate that 90% of flowering plant species are animal-pollinated. National Science Review 10(10): nwad219. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/nsr/nwad219" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwad219</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B50">
        <mixed-citation>Ulrich S, Bröderbauer D, Wong SY, Boyce PC, Hesse M (2010) The resurrection of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Poster. Third Croatian Botanical Congress, Croatia, Murter.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B51">
        <mixed-citation>Ulrich S, Hesse M, Bröderbauer D, Wong SY, Boyce PC (2012) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Schismatoglottis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe">Schismatoglottideae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>): a new example for the significance of pollen morphology in <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> systematics. Taxon 61: 281–292. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/tax.612001" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.612001</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B52">
        <mixed-citation>van der Ham RWJM, Hetterscheid WLA, van Heuven BJ (1998) Notes on the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Amorphophallus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>)–8: pollen morphology of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Amorphophallus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Pseudodracontium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 103: 95–142. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/S0034-6667(98)00042-6" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-6667(98)00042-6</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B53">
        <mixed-citation>van der Kooi CJ, Vallejo-Marín M, Leonhardt SD (2021) Mutualism and (a)symmetry in plant-pollinator interactions. Current Biology 31: R91–R99. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.cub.2020.11.020" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.11.020</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B54">
        <mixed-citation>van der Kooi CJ, Reuvers L, Spaethe J (2023) Honesty, reliability, and information content of floral signals. Iscience 26: 107093. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.isci.2023.107093" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107093</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B55">
        <mixed-citation>Vogel S, Martens J (2000) A survey of the function of the lethal kettle traps of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Arisaema</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), with records of pollinating fungus gnats from Nepal. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 61–100. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1095-8339.2000.tb01537.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2000.tb01537.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B56">
        <mixed-citation>Wright GA, Schiestl FP (2009) The evolution of floral scent: the influence of olfactory learning by insect pollinators on the honest signalling of floral rewards. Functional Ecology 23: 841–851. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01627.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01627.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B57">
        <mixed-citation>Xiao L, Li N-N, Yang L-K, Li J-L, Gao J-J (2022) Evolution of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">gigantea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species group (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Drosophilidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>): phylogeny, biogeography and shift of host use. Insects 13: 647. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/insects13070647" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13070647</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B58">
        <mixed-citation>Yafuso M (1993) Thermogenesis of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Alocasia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">odora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and the role of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Drosophilidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) as cross-pollinators. Environmental Entomology 22(3): 601–606. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/ee/22.3.601" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/22.3.601</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B59">
        <mixed-citation>Zeng L, Shu W, He H, Li T, Yang X, Li L (2023) Post-pollination barriers contribute to coexistence of partially pollinator-sharing <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Arisaema</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Araceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Ecology and Evolution 13: e10696. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1002/ece3.10696">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10696</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <sec sec-type="supplementary-material">
      <title>Supplementary materials</title>
      <supplementary-material id="S1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.5091/plecevo.169286.suppl1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">538F612A-0F7B-5ADC-9909-496ACE65A16C</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 1</label>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <p>Numbers of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Colocasiomyia">Colocasiomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flies and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cycreon">Cycreon</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> beetles recorded from 49 bagged inflorescences of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Note: 10 additional inflorescences were used exclusively for pollination observations and are not included in these counts.</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="plecevo-159-268-s001.csv" mimetype="text" mime-subtype="csv" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1611304.csv">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1611304</uri>
        </media>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S2" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.5091/plecevo.169286.suppl2</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">57DD8DB6-4C91-53B4-B2D6-F954C2F92A6A</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 2</label>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <p>Counts of pistillate flowers and berries obtained from separate sets of inflorescences and infructescences of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Apoballis">Apoballis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mutata">mutata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> collected from different individuals.</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="plecevo-159-268-s002.csv" mimetype="text" mime-subtype="csv" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1611305.csv">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1611305</uri>
        </media>
      </supplementary-material>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
