<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "../../nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">118</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:71cc5dc6-a767-5334-951f-ef6ae8936459</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Plant Ecology and Evolution</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">plecevo</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2032-3913</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2032-3921</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Meise Botanic Garden and Royal Botanical Society of Belgium</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5091/plecevo.105931</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">105931</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="biological_taxon">
          <subject>Angiospermae</subject>
          <subject>Asparagales</subject>
          <subject>Basal Angiosperms: Monocots</subject>
          <subject>Orchidaceae</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Identification key</subject>
          <subject>Systematics</subject>
          <subject>Taxonomy</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="geographical_area">
          <subject>Africa</subject>
          <subject>South Africa</subject>
          <subject> Lesotho and Swaziland</subject>
          <subject>Southern Africa</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="edwardii">edwardii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Orchidaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), a new species from the Pondoland Centre of Endemism in South Africa</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Bytebier</surname>
            <given-names>Benny</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">bytebier@ukzn.ac.za</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4661-5727</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">University of KwaZulu-Natal, Scottsville, South Africa</addr-line>
        <institution>University of KwaZulu-Natal</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Scottsville</addr-line>
        <country>South Africa</country>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Benny Bytebier (<email xlink:type="simple">bytebier@ukzn.ac.za</email>)</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p>Academic editor: João Farminhão</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2023</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>12</day>
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2023</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>156</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>326</fpage>
      <lpage>332</lpage>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/C7C5CB4F-6DA6-51A9-9481-09E9F6E42A8A">C7C5CB4F-6DA6-51A9-9481-09E9F6E42A8A</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>04</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2023</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>28</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2023</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Benny Bytebier</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p><bold>Background and aims</bold> – Despite the fact that the orchid flora of South Africa is well documented, new species are still being discovered. The identity of an <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> subpopulation from near Port Edward in KwaZulu-Natal has been ambiguous. Some thought that it belongs to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, currently considered a synonym of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, whereas others were of the opinion that it was potentially a new species. Both hypotheses are investigated here.</p>
        <p><bold>Material and methods</bold> – Plants were studied in the field and herbarium specimens, including types, were consulted. The relevant published literature was revised.</p>
        <p><bold>Key results</bold> – <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is confirmed as a synonym of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. The Port Edward subpopulation does not match any known <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> taxon and is newly described as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="edwardii">edwardii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, endemic to the Pondoland Centre of Endemism. It is only known from one subpopulation of about 200 individuals, which is threatened by urban development. It is, therefore, assessed as Critically Endangered according to Criterion B2ab(i,ii,iii).</p>
        <p><bold>Conclusion</bold> – The newly described species increases the number of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species in South Africa to 29 and the number of endemic <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species to 10. This discovery underlines the need for continued botanical inventories and protection of sensitive grasslands.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>
          <tp:taxon-name>
            <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe">Cymbidieae</tp:taxon-name-part>
          </tp:taxon-name>
        </kwd>
        <kwd>
          <tp:taxon-name>
            <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subtribe">Eulophiinae</tp:taxon-name-part>
          </tp:taxon-name>
        </kwd>
        <kwd>KwaZulu-Natal</kwd>
        <kwd>new species</kwd>
        <kwd>
          <tp:taxon-name>
            <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Orchidaceae</tp:taxon-name-part>
          </tp:taxon-name>
        </kwd>
        <kwd>Pondoland</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="SECID0ECH">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The terrestrial epidendroid orchid genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> R.Br. ex Lindl. is widespread in the tropical and subtropical areas of Africa, Asia, and the Americas. It is most diverse in tropical and southern Africa, particularly in the dambos (shallow wetlands), grasslands, and miombo woodlands of south-central Africa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Williamson 1977</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">la Croix and Cribb 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Cribb 2009</xref>).</p>
      <p><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in the traditional sense (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Cribb 2009</xref>) consisted of about 200 species, but was shown to be paraphyletic and was, therefore, split into two genera: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sensu stricto and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Orthochilus">Orthochilus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Hochst. ex A.Rich. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Martos et al. 2014</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bone et al. (2015)</xref>, based on a more extensive sampling, particularly of the endemic Malagasy genera, confirmed the paraphyly of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and followed the taxonomic opinion of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Martos et al. (2014)</xref>, i.e. to resurrect the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Orthochilus">Orthochilus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. As a result, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Martos et al. (2014)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bone et al. (2015)</xref>, in line with long-standing tradition, recognise nine <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subtribe">Eulophiinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> genera namely, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Acrolophia">Acrolophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Pfitzer, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cymbidiella">Cymbidiella</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Rolfe, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophiella">Eulophiella</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Rolfe, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Geodorum">Geodorum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Andrews, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Grammangis">Grammangis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Rchb.f., <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Oeceoclades">Oeceoclades</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Lindl., <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Orthochilus">Orthochilus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Paralophia">Paralophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> P.J.Cribb &amp; Hermans, of which <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> remains by far the largest (165 species). For future research on the group, both author teams recommended extending the phylogenetic analysis with the inclusion of more <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> taxa (so far only 30% have been sampled), particularly with Asian species. They also stressed the need for a comprehensive monographic treatment of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (as well as the other <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subtribe">Eulophiinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> genera), particularly in view of the fact that many species are widespread and show considerable regional variation. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Chase et al. (2021)</xref> based on the same data, and without adding any new molecular or morphological analysis, argued for lumping all <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subtribe">Eulophiinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> genera, except <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Grammangis">Grammangis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, into <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (sensu lato), making <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> amorphous and difficult to circumscribe.</p>
      <p><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (sensu stricto) contains approximately 165 species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Martos et al. 2014</xref>). With 28 currently recognised species, it is the fourth largest orchid genus in South Africa after <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Disa">Disa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> P.J.Bergius (145 spp.), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Satyrium">Satyrium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Sw. (43 spp.), and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Habenaria">Habenaria</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Willd. (30 spp.) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Johnson and Bytebier 2015</xref>). Nine species are endemic to South Africa and although several are rare (e.g. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="meleagris">meleagris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Rchb.f.), only one, i.e. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="coddii">coddii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> A.V.Hall, can be considered a narrow endemic. Several species are pollinated by bees but autonomous self-pollination has also been recorded (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Peter 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Johnson and Bytebier 2015</xref>).</p>
      <p>Here, I investigate the identity of an <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> population from near Port Edward in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, which was discovered back in 2008 by a group of orchid enthusiasts lead by Martin Rautenbach. These plants did not match the circumscription of any of the South African <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species and could not be immediately named. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">McDonald (2009)</xref> in a note in the magazine “Orchids South Africa” suggested that they belong to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> L.Bolus, a taxon only known from the type and considered to be a synonym of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Rolfe by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Hall (1965)</xref> in his monograph on the South African species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Others thought that this may possibly be a new species (Martin Rautenbach pers. comm.). Here, I examine both hypotheses.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="SECID0EOJAC">
      <title>Material and methods</title>
      <p>Forty herbarium specimens from BOL, GRA, NBG, NH, NU, PRE, and SAM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Thiers 2023</xref>) of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and including the type material of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, were examined and compared with those of the Port Edward population (Appendix <xref ref-type="app" rid="app1">1</xref>).</p>
      <p>The only known population of the new taxon was visited by the author in February 2014 and 2015, during the flowering period, to record basic morphometric data and to collect herbarium material for further study.</p>
      <p>The preliminary IUCN conservation assessment was done following the guidelines in the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">IUCN 2022</xref>).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results and discussion" id="SECID0EZKAC">
      <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p>Comparison of the holotype specimen of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic>Schnell s.n.</italic> in Herb. Bolus 22,860 [BOL149961]) with specimens of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> confirms the opinion of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Hall (1965)</xref>, i.e. that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> fits entirely within the concept of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and should be considered as a synonym of the latter.</p>
      <p>Comparison of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> material from Port Edward with the holotype of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and specimens of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> clearly shows that these belong to two different taxa. Flowers of the Port Edward plants are fully resupinate at anthesis, whereas those of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> are not resupinate. The papery sheaths on the peduncle of the Port Edward plants are always overlapping, whereas those in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> cover at maximum only half the size of the internode, and those in other <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> specimens only occasionally reach the base of the sheath above. Furthermore, these sheaths are of a much firmer texture. Flowering time of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is November and peak flowering of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is November/December, whereas the Port Edward plants consistently flower in mid to late February. King William’s Town (now called Qonce), the type locality of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, is 40 km inland from the sea, whereas the Port Edward plants are just a few hundred meters from the beach and in coastal grassland. Furthermore, as the crow flies, King William’s Town is about 335 km from Port Edward. Thus, assigning the Port Edward plants to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was an error of judgment most likely resulting from comparison of photos of these plants with the painting in the protologue of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Bolus 1946</xref>), rather than with the actual type specimen. To summarise, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is a synonym of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and the Port Edward population neither matches the concept of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, nor that of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
      <p>A specimen from this population was included in the phylogenetic analysis of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Martos et al. (2014)</xref> as “<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> ?<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>” and although weakly supported, seemed to be more closely related to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="ovalis">ovalis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Lindl. than to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Thus, in view of the fact that the Port Edward plants do not fit in the concept of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, or any other <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species, I here describe it as a new species.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Taxonomic treatment" id="SECID0ENEAE">
      <title>Taxonomic treatment</title>
      <tp:taxon-treatment>
        <tp:treatment-meta>
          <kwd-group>
            <label>Taxon classification</label>
            <kwd>
              <named-content content-type="kingdom" xlink:type="simple">Plantae</named-content>
            </kwd>
            <kwd>
              <named-content content-type="order" xlink:type="simple">Asparagales</named-content>
            </kwd>
            <kwd>
              <named-content content-type="family" xlink:type="simple">Orchidaceae</named-content>
            </kwd>
          </kwd-group>
        </tp:treatment-meta>
        <tp:nomenclature>
          <tp:taxon-name><object-id content-type="arpha">068871A8-B38F-5E68-95DF-1E2BC4DD7F32</object-id>
            <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part>
            <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="edwardii">edwardii</tp:taxon-name-part>
            <object-id content-type="ipni" xlink:type="simple">urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77318678-1</object-id>
          </tp:taxon-name>
          <tp:taxon-authority>Bytebier</tp:taxon-authority>
          <tp:taxon-status>sp. nov.</tp:taxon-status>
          <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figs 1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">, 2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">, 3</xref>
        </tp:nomenclature>
        <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="material" id="SECID0EGGAE">
          <title>Type.</title>
          <p>SOUTH AFRICA – <bold>KwaZulu-Natal</bold> • Port Edward, Rennies Beach; <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates"><named-content content-type="geo-json" specific-use="{&quot;type&quot;:&quot;Point&quot;,&quot;coordinates&quot;:[30.200000,-31.066667]}" id="NCID0ERGAE">31°04’S, 30°12’E</named-content></named-content>; 15 m; 8 Feb. 2015; fl.; <italic>B. Bytebier, K.W. Grieve &amp; G.R.H. Grieve 3501</italic>; holotype: NU [NU0094001]; isotypes: BR, NH, NU [NU0094003].</p>
        </tp:treatment-sec>
        <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="diagnosis" id="SECID0EYGAE">
          <title>Diagnosis.</title>
          <p><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="edwardii">edwardii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is morphologically most similar to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, but differs from <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> by having fully resupinate flowers at anthesis vs non-resupinate in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, by having white petals vs creamy-yellow petals; and by having papery, overlapping sheaths on the peduncle vs more sturdy, non-overlapping sheaths or occasionally the tip of one sheath only just reaching the bottom of the next one. It differs from <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="ovalis">ovalis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> by having spreading petals instead of petals that cover the column and are bent over the lip.</p>
          <fig id="F1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
            <object-id content-type="doi">10.5091/plecevo.105931.figure1</object-id>
            <object-id content-type="arpha">1DF3E982-D5F4-560A-BD4A-BB0F21D89882</object-id>
            <label>Figure 1.</label>
            <caption>
              <p><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="edwardii">edwardii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. <bold>A</bold>. Habit. <bold>B</bold>. Anther cap: side view and view from below. <bold>C</bold>. Pollinarium. <bold>D</bold>. Column: front and side view. <bold>E</bold>. Petal. <bold>F</bold>. Lip. <bold>G</bold>. Sepal. <bold>H</bold>. Pedicel, ovary, median sepal and part of lip showing spur. <bold>I</bold>. Apex of spur. <bold>J</bold>. Papillae on lip. <bold>K</bold>. Side view of flower. <bold>L</bold>. Front view of flower. <bold>M</bold>. Leaves. Figure drawn by Kate Grieve.</p>
            </caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="plecevo-156-326-g001.jpg" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple" id="oo_904607.jpg">
              <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/904607</uri>
            </graphic>
          </fig>
        </tp:treatment-sec>
        <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="description" id="SECID0EHKAE">
          <title>Description.</title>
          <p>Terrestrial <underline>herb</underline>, 220–325 mm tall. <underline>Perennating organs</underline> subterranean, forming a beaded rhizome up to 110 mm long with up to 7 globose to ovoid tuberous units, each 15–20 mm in diameter and 10–17 mm tall, covered with fibrous remains of leaf bases; roots white, up to 170 mm long × 3–5 mm wide. <underline>Leaves</underline> 5–9, fully developed at anthesis, arranged in an arcuate fan, plicate, linear to linear-lanceolate, acute, the uppermost up to 270 mm long × 20 mm wide, the lowermost 2–3 much smaller and dry at anthesis. <underline>Inflorescence</underline> erect, lax to subdense, 5–14-flowered; peduncle slender, 2–3 mm in diameter, covered with 6–8 papery, overlapping sheaths, up to 115 mm long × 14 mm wide; rachis 30–50 mm with papery, lanceolate to elliptic, acuminate bracts 15–17 mm long × 5–9 mm wide, slightly shorter than the ovary. <underline>Flowers</underline> fully resupinate at anthesis, sepals brownish green to green, petals and lip white, papillae pale yellow, spur greenish to greenish brown. <underline>Sepals</underline> spreading; median sepal 19–22 mm long × 6–7 mm wide, apex acute to attenuate; lateral sepals 23–25 mm long × 7–9 mm wide, apex acute to attenuate. <underline>Petals</underline> spreading, 21–25 mm long × 10–14 mm wide, ovate to elliptic, apex obtuse to rounded. <underline>Lip</underline> 3-lobed, 19–21 mm long × 20–24 mm wide; side lobes elliptic to obovate, 12 mm long × 6 mm wide; midlobe orbicular with 3 undulate ridges in basal third and 3 tomentose veins on either side of the ridges, ridges passing into relatively few, long, slender, branched papillae ending abruptly midway along the lip. <underline>Spur</underline> 5 mm, conical to cylindrical, slightly dorsoventrally flattened, incurved and often slightly bifid at apex. <underline>Column</underline> 5–6 mm. <underline>Anther cap</underline> 1.5–2 mm wide, beaked. <underline>Pollinia</underline> 2 attached to stipe of 1 mm. <underline>Ovary</underline> 19–29 mm long. <underline>Fruit</underline> ellipsoidal, pendent.</p>
          <fig id="F2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
            <object-id content-type="doi">10.5091/plecevo.105931.figure2</object-id>
            <object-id content-type="arpha">C6BBCB52-562B-52C2-BDAE-F37ACC99AF5C</object-id>
            <label>Figure 2.</label>
            <caption>
              <p><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="edwardii">edwardii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. <bold>A</bold>. Inflorescence. <bold>B</bold>. Flower. <bold>C</bold>. Plant in habitat. Photographs A and B by Florent Martos; C by Graham Grieve.</p>
            </caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="plecevo-156-326-g002.jpg" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple" id="oo_904608.jpg">
              <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/904608</uri>
            </graphic>
          </fig>
        </tp:treatment-sec>
        <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="distribution" id="SECID0EHMAE">
          <title>Distribution.</title>
          <p>Only known from the type locality (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>).</p>
          <fig id="F3" position="float" orientation="portrait">
            <object-id content-type="doi">10.5091/plecevo.105931.figure3</object-id>
            <object-id content-type="arpha">C121CC06-A763-5AB5-AF87-1F600401981D</object-id>
            <label>Figure 3.</label>
            <caption>
              <p>Distribution map of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (white circles and a yellow circle for the type specimen of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="edwardii">edwardii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (red circle). Map produced with Google Earth Pro (data SIO, NOAA, U.S. Navy, NGA, GEBCO; image Landsat / Copernicus).</p>
            </caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="plecevo-156-326-g003.jpg" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple" id="oo_904609.jpg">
              <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/904609</uri>
            </graphic>
          </fig>
        </tp:treatment-sec>
        <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="habitat" id="SECID0E6NAE">
          <title>Habitat and ecology.</title>
          <p>Growing in moist, hygrophilous, lightly sloping, windswept, species-rich coastal grassland, dotted with clumps of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Strelitzia">Strelitzia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="nicolai">nicolai</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Regel &amp; Körn. CREW (Custodians of Rare and Endangered Wildflowers) Pondoland members have documented more than 370 species of indigenous angiosperms on this piece of land, including 16 other orchid species (Kate Grieve and Graham Grieve pers. comm.).</p>
        </tp:treatment-sec>
        <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="phenology" id="SECID0EQOAE">
          <title>Phenology.</title>
          <p>Flowering in February (end of summer).</p>
        </tp:treatment-sec>
        <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="etymology" id="SECID0EVOAE">
          <title>Etymology.</title>
          <p>Named in honour of Edward (Ted) George Hudson Oliver for his lifelong dedication to botany, particularly the study of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ericaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Orchidaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Indirectly, it also refers to Port Edward, so far, the only place where this taxon is known to occur.</p>
        </tp:treatment-sec>
        <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Preliminary IUCN conservation assessment" id="SECID0EFPAE">
          <title>Preliminary IUCN conservation assessment.</title>
          <p>Critically Endangered: CR B2ab(i,ii,iii). As far as can be judged from repeated monitoring by the author and the CREW Pondoland team, the subpopulation is stable, and although the number of flowering individuals (the only possible way of counting the individual plants) changes from year to year, the maximum number of flowering specimens has never been more than an estimated 200. These occur in one subpopulation spread out over an area of about one hectare (B2a). CREW Pondoland has surveyed the very few remaining patches of coastal grassland near Port Edward in KwaZulu-Natal, as well as several along the Eastern Cape Pondoland coast. Despite numerous efforts, no additional subpopulations have so far been traced. A decline in the extent of occurrence (B2bi), area of occupancy (B2bii), and extent and quality of habitat (B2biii) is inferred in view of the fact that north of the Mtamvuna river (as far north as Durban, which is well beyond the limits of the Pondoland Center of Endemism) almost no untransformed grasslands close to the sea and matching the type locality still exist. North of Durban, coastal grasslands in proximity to the highwater mark do not exist until near the mouth of the Tugela. The loss of comparable habitat in KwaZulu-Natal is now nearly complete at least over this 225 km of coastline between the Mtamvuna and Tugela Rivers. A further decline of potential habitats is almost not possible as they are all already lost, making this species highly vulnerable to a catastrophic event, such as an attempt to develop the plot, which borders an important, interprovincial road and is close to the beach. The land on which the plants occur is currently privately owned and is unprotected, despite the fact that it contains 13 Pondoland endemics, six Near Threatened, five Vulnerable, one Endangered (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eriosema">Eriosema</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="umtamvunense">umtamvunense</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> C.H.Stirt.), and one Critically Endangered (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Hyobanche">Hyobanche</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fulleri">fulleri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> E.Phillips) species (<ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://redlist.sanbi.org">http://redlist.sanbi.org</ext-link>). Furthermore, it has four species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Indigofera">Indigofera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> that have just been described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Grieve et al. 2023</xref>), as well as an overlooked <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Exochaenium">Exochaenium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, which will be described in another paper. A potential long-term solution would be to extend the close-by Red Desert Nature Reserve, a conservation Stewardship Site managed by the Red Desert Conservation Trust, so that it incorporates the land on which the single subpopulation of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="edwardii">edwardii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> occurs.</p>
        </tp:treatment-sec>
        <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="material" id="SECID0EDRAE">
          <title>Additional material examined.</title>
          <p>SOUTH AFRICA – <bold>KwaZulu-Natal</bold> • 3130AA; Port Edward, Rennies Beach; 10 m; 18 Feb. 2010; <italic>Abbott 9097</italic>; PCE [PCE0007850] photo, PRU, NU spirit • ibid.; 6 Feb. 2013; <italic>K.W. Grieve 726</italic>; NU spirit • ibid.; 17 Feb. 2014; <italic>Bytebier 3477</italic>; NU spirit • South of Port Edward; 27 Feb. 2011; <italic>Church &amp; Goodman s.n.</italic>; BR, NU.</p>
        </tp:treatment-sec>
        <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Phylogenetic placement" id="SECID0ETRAE">
          <title>Phylogenetic placement.</title>
          <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Martos et al. (2014)</xref> included this taxon (as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> ?<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="schnelliae">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) in their phylogenetic sampling, where it was placed sister to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="ovalis">ovalis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, although only with weak support.</p>
        </tp:treatment-sec>
        <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Taxonomic notes" id="SECID0EYSAE">
          <title>Taxonomic notes.</title>
          <p>Apart from the diagnostic characters mentioned above, there are several, more subtle differences between <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="edwardii">edwardii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. The former has between 6 and 8 papery leaf sheaths, whereas the latter has seldom more than 5 leaf sheaths, which are of a firmer texture. The longest leaf sheath, found in the middle of the peduncle, is on average 80 mm in the former (and up to 115 mm), whereas in the latter it is seldom more than 60 mm. The lateral sepals are 7 mm wide or more in the former whereas they are seldom more than 6 mm in the latter. The width of the lip is usually more than 20 mm in the former and seldom more than 17 mm in the latter. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="edwardii">edwardii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> flowers in mid to late February, while most records for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> are from November and December. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is endemic to the Eastern Cape province, whereas <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="edwardii">edwardii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> occurs in KwaZulu-Natal (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="edwardii">edwardii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is also superficially similar to <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="ovalis">ovalis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="infraspecific-rank">var.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="variety" reg="ovalis">ovalis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Vegetatively they look very much alike, but the flowers are not comparable. The petals of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="edwardii">edwardii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> are clearly spreading, whereas those of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="ovalis">ovalis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> are bent forward over the lip. The side lobes of the lip are rounder and bigger in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="edwardii">edwardii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> as compared to those of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="ovalis">ovalis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and the papillae in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="edwardii">edwardii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> end abruptly half way the lip, whereas those in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="ovalis">ovalis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> extend further than half way. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="ovalis">ovalis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> has also not been recorded along the Pondoland Coast. The closest known population of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="ovalis">ovalis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> occurs along the Mzimkhulu River about 70 km north-northeast of Port Edward.</p>
        </tp:treatment-sec>
      </tp:taxon-treatment>
      <sec sec-type="Key modification" id="SECID0EYYAE">
        <title>Key modification</title>
        <p>The following modification to the key to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Linder and Kurzweil (1999)</xref> is proposed after following steps 1b, 2b, 7b, 17b, 19b, 36a, 37b, 38b, 39b.</p>
        <table-wrap content-type="key" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
          <table id="TID0EEMAC" rules="all">
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">40a</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Leaves less than half the length of the scape at anthesis; spur 1.2–2.2 mm long; crest papillae few, confined to the basal 1/3 of the lip midlobe</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <italic>
                      <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cooperi">cooperi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                    </italic>
                  </bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">40b</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Leaves usually more than 2/3 length of the scape at anthesis; if less, then the spur more than 3 mm long and crest papillae numerous over most of lip</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>41</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">40c</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Leaves approximately half the length of the scape at anthesis; spur 5 mm long; crest papillae few, branched and restricted to middle of the lip</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <italic>
                      <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="edwardii">edwardii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                    </italic>
                  </bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>The author wishes to thank CREW Pondoland and particularly Kate and Graham Grieve for their knowledge, enthusiasm, and assistance, the curators of BOL, GRA, K, NBG, NH, and PRE for sending specimens on loan. Florent Martos is thanked for assistance in the field. Kate Grieve provided the drawing; and Graham Grieve, as well as Florent Martos, provided photographs, which are reproduced here with permission. Adam Shuttleworth assisted with Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>. I sincerely thank the editor and the three reviewers for their constructive comments and corrections.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple"><person-group><name name-style="western"><surname>Bolus</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1946</year>) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Flowering Plants of Africa 25: Plate 965.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple"><person-group><name name-style="western"><surname>Bone</surname><given-names>RE</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Cribb</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Buerki</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>) Phylogenetics of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subtribe">Eulophiinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Orchidaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Epidendroideae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>): evolutionary patterns and implications for generic delimitation. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 179(1): 43−56. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1111/boj.12299">https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12299</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple"><person-group><name name-style="western"><surname>Chase</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Schuiteman</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>) Expansion of the orchid genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subtribe">Eulophiinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>; <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Epidendroideae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) to include <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Acrolophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Cymbidiella</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Eulophiella</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Geodorum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Oeceoclades</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Paralophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Phytotaxa 491(1): 47−56. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.11646/phytotaxa.491.1.5">https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.491.1.5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple"><person-group><name name-style="western"><surname>Cribb</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>) 460. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. In: Pridgeon AM, Cribb PJ, Chase MW, Rasmussen FN (Eds) Genera Orchidacearum Volume 5 <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Epidendroideae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (Part two). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 100−107.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple"><person-group><name name-style="western"><surname>Grieve</surname><given-names>KW</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Grieve</surname><given-names>GRH</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Schrire</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>) New and poorly known taxa of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Indigofera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Fabaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Papillionoideae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, Indigoferae) from the Pondoland Centre of Endemism, South Africa: Part 1. South African Journal of Botany 160: 55−74. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1016/j.sajb.2023.06.039">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2023.06.039</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple"><person-group><name name-style="western"><surname>Hall</surname><given-names>AV</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1965</year>) Studies of the South African species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Journal of South African Botany. Supplementary Volume No V: 1−248.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">IUCN (<year>2022</year>) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Version 15. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/redlistguidelines">https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/redlistguidelines</ext-link> [accessed 10.07.2023]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple"><person-group><name name-style="western"><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Bytebier</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>) Orchids of South Africa. A Field Guide. Struik Nature, Cape Town, 1−536.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple"><person-group><name name-style="western"><surname>la Croix</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Cribb</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. In: Pope GV (Ed.) Flora Zambesiaca, Vol. 11, Part 2. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 458−537.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple"><person-group><name name-style="western"><surname>Linder</surname><given-names>HP</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kurzweil</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>) Orchids of Southern Africa. AA Balkema, Rotterdam/Brookfield, 1−492.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple"><person-group><name name-style="western"><surname>Martos</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Peter</surname><given-names>CI</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Bytebier</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>) A molecular phylogeny reveals paraphyly of the large genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Orchidaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>): a case for the reinstatement of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Orthochilus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Taxon 63(1): 9−23. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.12705/631.6">https://doi.org/10.12705/631.6</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple"><person-group><name name-style="western"><surname>McDonald</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>) A short note on the potential rediscovery of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">schnelliae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Orchids South Africa 40(2): 18−19.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple"><person-group><name name-style="western"><surname>Peter</surname><given-names>CI</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>) Pollination, floral deception and evolutionary processes in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Orchidaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and its allies. PhD Thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/handle/10413/2720">https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/handle/10413/2720</ext-link> [accessed 11.08.2023]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple"><person-group><name name-style="western"><surname>Thiers</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>) Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/">https://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/</ext-link> [accessed 27.01.2023]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple"><person-group><name name-style="western"><surname>Williamson</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1977</year>) The Orchids of South Central Africa. J.M. Dent &amp; Sons Ltd, London, 1−237.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <app-group>
      <app id="app1">
        <title>Appendix</title>
        <p><bold>Appendix 1.</bold> Material examined of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eulophia">Eulophia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macowanii">macowanii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
        <p>SOUTH AFRICA – <bold>Eastern Cape</bold> • Frasers Camp; 11 Jan. 1947; <italic>Compton R.H. 19095</italic>; NBG [NBG0056558-0] • 3128DA; Umtata; 27 Nov. 1954; <italic>Lowry C. s.n.</italic>; BOL [BOL69482] • 3128DB; Umtata, Unitra Campus; 18 Nov. 1982; <italic>Hutchings A. 50</italic>; GRA • 3128DB; ibid.; 28 Nov. 2001; <italic>Peter C. 429</italic>; NU [NU0005494] • 3128DB; Umtata; Dec. 1915; <italic>McLoughlin A.G. 4174</italic>; BOL [BOL69481] • 3226DB; Chumie Peak; 1884; <italic>Sculy W.C. 173</italic>; BOL [BOL69484] • 3227CB; Dohne Peak; 27 Jan. 2001; <italic>McMaster J.C. DP 2701</italic>; NBG [NBG0182626-0] • 3227CD; King William’s Town; 28 Nov. 1942; <italic>Schnell I.A. s.n.</italic>; BOL [BOL69483, BOL149961] • 3227CD; Mount Coke; 457 m; 1891; <italic>Sim T.R. 20111</italic>; PRE [PRE0053622-0] • 3227DB; Komgha; 609 m ; Dec. 1893; <italic>Flanagan H.G. 2254</italic>; BOL [BOL73224], PRE [PRE0053609-0] • 3228CB; Kei Mouth; 30 m; Jan. 1892; <italic>Flanagan H.G. 1033</italic>; PRE [PRE0053610-0] • 3228CB; ibid.; 30 m; Jan. 1892; <italic>Flanagan H.G. 1032</italic>; PRE [PRE0053611-0] • 3228CC; Gonubie; Mar. 1980; <italic>Howe W. s.n.</italic>; GRA • 3325CD; Bridgemead; 175 m; 21 Jan. 1997; <italic>Dold T. 2482</italic>; GRA • 3325DC; Frames Drift; Feb. 1917; <italic>Holland M.A. 18</italic>; BOL [BOL73221] • 3326BD; Oribi Reserve; 375 m; 11 Jan. 1995; <italic>Dold T. 1252</italic>; GRA • 3326BD; Trappe’s Valley; 19 Dec. 1965; <italic>Bayliss R.D.A. 3083</italic>; NBG [NBG0083410-0] • 3326BD; Trappe’s Valley; 26 Dec. 1903; <italic>Ansley E. 15</italic>; PRE [PRE0053621-0] • 3326CB; Alexandria; 213 m; 24 Jan. 1955; <italic>Acocks J.P.H. 17879</italic>; PRE [PRE0053615-0] • 3326DA; Hayes Siding; 28 Nov. 1983; <italic>Weeks D.C. 127</italic>; GRA • 3326DA; Bushmans River; Jan. 1932; <italic>Holland F.H. 3815</italic>; BOL [BOL51691, BOL73225] • 3326DB; Port Alfred; 29 Mar. 1903; <italic>White G. 73</italic>; GRA • 3326DB; Kowie West; Feb. 1917; <italic>Tyson W. s.n.</italic>; BOL [BOL73222]; 3326DB; Kowie; Aug. 1915; <italic>Tyson W. 16845</italic>; BOL [BOL73223] • 3326DB; ibid.; 60 m; 9 Nov. 1895; <italic>Galpin E.E. 3025</italic>; PRE [PRE0053620-0] • 3326DB; Port Alfred; 1893; <italic>South B. s.n.</italic> PRE [PRE0053613-0] • 3326DB; Bathurst; 1890; <italic>South B. s.n.</italic>; PRE [PRE0053616-0] • 3326DB; ibid.; Sep. 1915; <italic>Marloth H.W.R. 8523</italic>; PRE [PRE0053612-0] • 3326DB; Kowie; Dec. 1890; <italic>Hutton H. 1215</italic>; BOL [BOL149962] • 3326DB; Bathurst; 10 Jan. 1974; <italic>Retief E. 310</italic>; PRE [PRE0611551-0] • 3326DB; Kowie; <italic>MacOwan P. s.n.</italic>; PRE [PRE0053619-0] • 3326DB; ibid.; Jan. 1907; <italic>Britten L.L. 10813</italic>; PRE [PRE0053614-0] • 3326DB; Kowie; 518 m; Dec. 1890; <italic>Hutton H. 1215</italic>; SAM [SAM0020352-0] • 3327BA; Kidd’s Beach; Dec. 1943; <italic>Giffen M.H. FH 1770</italic>; PRE [PRE0540057-0] • 3327BB; East London; Dec. 1888; <italic>Thode J. 7716</italic>; NBG [NBG0182627-0] • 3327BB; East London Cemetery; 30 m; Dec. 1926; <italic>Smith C.A. 3787</italic>; PRE [PRE0053617-0] • 3327CA; Kleinemund River; <italic>MacOwan P. 1280</italic>; BOL [BOL69485].</p>
      </app>
    </app-group>
  </back>
</article>
